The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on free tissue transfer outcomes: A NSQIP analysis.


Journal

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS
ISSN: 1878-0539
Titre abrégé: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101264239

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2023
Historique:
received: 21 02 2023
revised: 12 06 2023
accepted: 22 06 2023
medline: 6 11 2023
pubmed: 21 9 2023
entrez: 20 9 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted hospital resources and patient care, although its effect on free tissue transfer procedures is poorly understood. We conducted the current study to investigate the potential impact of COVID-19 and its accompanying system shut-downs on the surgical outcomes of patients undergoing free flap procedures. Patients undergoing free tissue transfer procedures were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2016 to 2020. We used 2016-2019 as baseline (pre-pandemic) data to compare with 2020 (peri-pandemic). We divided the patients into the following 3 groups: all patients undergoing free tissue transfer, breast reconstruction free tissue transfer, and non-breast free tissue transfer cases. Outcomes of interest included patient morbidity/mortality, time to surgery, time to takeback, and length of hospital stay. We used Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact tests to assess categorical variables. Wilcoxon's ranked sign tests and ANOVA tests were used for non-parametric and parametric continuous variables, respectively. Significance was set at alpha < 0.05. When comparing peri-pandemic to pre-pandemic rates, patient morbidity and mortality and unplanned primary or secondary takeback operations were both significantly higher in all 3 groups peri-pandemic. Median time to primary or secondary takeback operation was also significantly greater peri-pandemic. Patients undergoing flap procedures peri-pandemic had an overall increase in median morbidity and mortality, unplanned primary or secondary takebacks, and median number of days to takebacks compared to the pre-pandemic period. This is concerning given that any future protocols instituted can have detrimental effects on patients who receive a free tissue transfer procedure.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted hospital resources and patient care, although its effect on free tissue transfer procedures is poorly understood. We conducted the current study to investigate the potential impact of COVID-19 and its accompanying system shut-downs on the surgical outcomes of patients undergoing free flap procedures.
METHODS
Patients undergoing free tissue transfer procedures were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2016 to 2020. We used 2016-2019 as baseline (pre-pandemic) data to compare with 2020 (peri-pandemic). We divided the patients into the following 3 groups: all patients undergoing free tissue transfer, breast reconstruction free tissue transfer, and non-breast free tissue transfer cases. Outcomes of interest included patient morbidity/mortality, time to surgery, time to takeback, and length of hospital stay. We used Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact tests to assess categorical variables. Wilcoxon's ranked sign tests and ANOVA tests were used for non-parametric and parametric continuous variables, respectively. Significance was set at alpha < 0.05.
RESULTS
When comparing peri-pandemic to pre-pandemic rates, patient morbidity and mortality and unplanned primary or secondary takeback operations were both significantly higher in all 3 groups peri-pandemic. Median time to primary or secondary takeback operation was also significantly greater peri-pandemic.
CONCLUSION
Patients undergoing flap procedures peri-pandemic had an overall increase in median morbidity and mortality, unplanned primary or secondary takebacks, and median number of days to takebacks compared to the pre-pandemic period. This is concerning given that any future protocols instituted can have detrimental effects on patients who receive a free tissue transfer procedure.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37729775
pii: S1748-6815(23)00374-1
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.06.053
pmc: PMC10300056
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

183-191

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest None declared.

Auteurs

Cynthia T Yusuf (CT)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Christopher D Lopez (CD)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Salih Colakoglu (S)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Carisa M Cooney (CM)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Damon S Cooney (DS)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: dcooney2@jhmi.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH