Comparative Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium on Moderate-to-Severe Exacerbations in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Clinical Practice in England.
COPD dual therapy
LABA/LAMA new users
comparative effectiveness
exacerbations
healthcare resource utilization
single-inhaler dual therapy
Journal
International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
ISSN: 1178-2005
Titre abrégé: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101273481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
09
03
2023
accepted:
31
08
2023
medline:
22
9
2023
pubmed:
21
9
2023
entrez:
21
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations are associated with significant morbidity and mortality and increased economic healthcare burden for patients with COPD. Long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting β This retrospective cohort study used linked primary care electronic health record data (Clinical Practice Research Datalink-Aurum) and secondary care data (Hospital Episode Statistics) to assess outcomes for patients with COPD who had a first prescription for single-inhaler UMEC/VI or IND/GLY (index date) between 1 January 2015 and 30 September 2019 (indexing period). Analyses compared UMEC/VI and IND/GLY on moderate-to-severe, moderate, and severe exacerbations, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and direct costs at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, and time-to-first on-treatment exacerbation up to 24 months post-index date. Following inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), non-inferiority and superiority of UMEC/VI versus IND/GLY were assessed. In total, 12,031 patients were included, of whom 8753 (72.8%) were prescribed UMEC/VI and 3278 (27.2%) IND/GLY. After IPTW, for moderate-to-severe exacerbations, weighted rate ratios were <1 at 6, 12, and 18 months and equal to 1 at 24 months for UMEC/VI; around the null value for moderate exacerbations and <1 at all timepoints for severe exacerbations. UMEC/VI showed lower HCRU incidence rates than IND/GLY for all-cause Accident and Emergency visits and COPD-related inpatient stays and associated all-cause costs at 6 months post-indexing. Time-to-triple therapy was similar for both treatments. UMEC/VI demonstrated non-inferiority to IND/GLY in moderate-to-severe exacerbation reduction at 6, 12 and 18 months. These results support previous findings demonstrating similarity between UMEC/VI and IND/GLY on reduction of moderate-to-severe exacerbations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37731774
doi: 10.2147/COPD.S408688
pii: 408688
pmc: PMC10508247
doi:
Substances chimiques
Glycopyrrolate
V92SO9WP2I
GSK573719
0
indacaterol
8OR09251MQ
vilanterol
028LZY775B
Muscarinic Antagonists
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2039-2054Informations de copyright
© 2023 Requena et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
GR, CCo, KJR, and ASI are employees of GSK and hold stocks and shares at GSK. ASI also holds an unpaid faculty position at McMaster University. AC was an employee of GSK and held stocks and shares at GSK at the time of the study. FJFH is an employee of the Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, part of the Germany lung research Foundation (DZL). JKQ holds a position at Imperial College London and has received grants or contracts paid to this institution outside the scope of the submitted work from the Medical Research Council, Health Data Research UK, GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Asthma + Lung UK, and AstraZeneca. JKQ has also received payment for advisory board participation, teaching or lectures from GSK, AstraZeneca, and Insmed. CCa, TT, RWo, and RWi are employees of Adelphi Real World. VB and JY were employees of Adelphi Real World at the time of the study. Adelphi Real World is a business that provides consulting and other research services to pharmaceutical, device, government, and non-government organizations which received funding from GSK to conduct the study. Adelphi Real World employees work with a variety of companies and organizations and are expressly prohibited from receiving any payment or honoraria directly from these organizations for services rendered. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 23;4(7):e005540
pubmed: 25056980
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 Apr;30(4):472-481
pubmed: 33368820
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Aug 10;17:1781-1795
pubmed: 35983168
Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Nov 21;8:771-782
pubmed: 27920578
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Apr 27;17:967-976
pubmed: 35510163
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Dec;17(12):1202-17
pubmed: 18972454
Adv Ther. 2022 Nov;39(11):4961-5010
pubmed: 35857184
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Jun;22(4):683-690
pubmed: 34530664
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Dec 1;48(6):1740-1740g
pubmed: 30859197
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 09;11(3):e0151357
pubmed: 26959820
Respir Res. 2020 Nov 25;21(1):310
pubmed: 33238986
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Jun 10;15:1335-1347
pubmed: 32606643
COPD. 2013 Apr;10(2):243-9
pubmed: 23514218