"We are not there yet": perceptions, beliefs and experiences of healthcare professionals caring for women with pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain in Australia.
Healthcare
Interviews
Medical
Midwifery
Pelvic girdle pain
Physiotherapy
Pregnancy
Qualitative
Journal
BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Sep 2023
21 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
26
03
2023
accepted:
14
09
2023
medline:
25
9
2023
pubmed:
22
9
2023
entrez:
22
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPGP) is a common condition worldwide. Women report being unprepared about PPGP, and state they receive little recognition and support from healthcare professionals. Situated within the Common-Sense Model and Convergent Care Theory, this study sought to gain a conceptual understanding of the perceptions, beliefs and experiences of healthcare professionals who provide routine care for women with PPGP in Australia. A qualitative research design, using individual, semi-structured interviews with purposive sampling of healthcare professionals (N=27) consisting of doctors (N=9), midwives (N=9) and physiotherapists (N=9). Most participants were female (22/27) with a range of professional experience. An interview guide consisting of open-ended questions was used with a flexible and responsive approach. Thematic analysis was performed where interview data were transcribed, coded, grouped into meaningful categories and then constructed into broad themes. Four themes were identified: 1. Identity and impact of PPGP; 2. What works well?; 3. What gets in the way?; and 4. Quality care: What is needed? Healthcare professionals recognised PPGP as a common and disabling condition, which created a large impact on a woman's life during pregnancy. Stepped-level care, including education and physiotherapy intervention, was seen to be helpful and led to a positive prognosis. Barriers at patient, clinician and organisation levels were identified and led to consequences for women with PPGP not receiving the care they need. This study elucidates important implications for health care delivery. Acknowledging that PPGP is a common condition causing difficulty for many women, healthcare professionals identified strong teamwork and greater clinical experience as important factors in being able to deliver appropriate healthcare. Whilst healthcare professionals reported being committed to caring for women during pregnancy, busy workloads, attitudes towards curability, and a lack of formal education were identified as barriers to care. The findings suggest timely access, clear referral pathways and an integrated approach are required for best care practice for women with PPGP. A greater emphasis on the need for multidisciplinary models of care during pregnancy is evident.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPGP) is a common condition worldwide. Women report being unprepared about PPGP, and state they receive little recognition and support from healthcare professionals. Situated within the Common-Sense Model and Convergent Care Theory, this study sought to gain a conceptual understanding of the perceptions, beliefs and experiences of healthcare professionals who provide routine care for women with PPGP in Australia.
METHODS
METHODS
A qualitative research design, using individual, semi-structured interviews with purposive sampling of healthcare professionals (N=27) consisting of doctors (N=9), midwives (N=9) and physiotherapists (N=9). Most participants were female (22/27) with a range of professional experience. An interview guide consisting of open-ended questions was used with a flexible and responsive approach. Thematic analysis was performed where interview data were transcribed, coded, grouped into meaningful categories and then constructed into broad themes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Four themes were identified: 1. Identity and impact of PPGP; 2. What works well?; 3. What gets in the way?; and 4. Quality care: What is needed? Healthcare professionals recognised PPGP as a common and disabling condition, which created a large impact on a woman's life during pregnancy. Stepped-level care, including education and physiotherapy intervention, was seen to be helpful and led to a positive prognosis. Barriers at patient, clinician and organisation levels were identified and led to consequences for women with PPGP not receiving the care they need.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This study elucidates important implications for health care delivery. Acknowledging that PPGP is a common condition causing difficulty for many women, healthcare professionals identified strong teamwork and greater clinical experience as important factors in being able to deliver appropriate healthcare. Whilst healthcare professionals reported being committed to caring for women during pregnancy, busy workloads, attitudes towards curability, and a lack of formal education were identified as barriers to care. The findings suggest timely access, clear referral pathways and an integrated approach are required for best care practice for women with PPGP. A greater emphasis on the need for multidisciplinary models of care during pregnancy is evident.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37735360
doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06000-x
pii: 10.1186/s12884-023-06000-x
pmc: PMC10512538
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
682Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Ceprnja D, Chipchase L, Fahey P, Liamputtong P, Gupta A. Prevalence and factors associated with pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy in Australian women: a cross-sectional study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021;46(14):944–9.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003954
pubmed: 33492087
Kanakaris NK, Roberts CS, Giannoudis PV. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: an update. BMC Med. 2011;9:15.
doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-15
pubmed: 21324134
pmcid: 3050758
Van De Pol G, Van Brummen HJ, Bruinse HW, Heintz AP, Van Der Vaart CH. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain in the Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(4):416–22.
doi: 10.1080/00016340601151683
pubmed: 17486462
Kovacs FM, Garcia E, Royuela A, González L, Abraira V, Spanish Back Pain Research Network. Prevalence and factors associated with low back pain and pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy: a multicenter study conducted in the Spanish National Health Service. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(17):1516–33.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824dcb74
pubmed: 22333958
Bastiaanssen JM, de Bie RA, Bastiaenen CH, Heuts A, Kroese ME, Essed GG, van den Brandt PA. Etiology and prognosis of pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain; design of a longitudinal study. BMC Public Health. 2005;5:1.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-1
pubmed: 15627405
pmcid: 548283
Elden H, Ladfors L, Olsen MF, Ostgaard HC, Hagberg H. Effects of acupuncture and stabilising exercises as adjunct to standard treatment in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain: randomised single blind controlled trial. BMJ. 2005;330(7494):761.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38397.507014.E0
pubmed: 15778231
pmcid: 555879
Pierce H, Homer CS, Dahlen HG, King J. Pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain: listening to Australian women. Nurs Res Pract. 2012;2012: 387428.
pubmed: 22685643
pmcid: 3366229
Elden H, Lundgren I, Robertson E. The pelvic ring of pain: Pregnant women’s experiences of severe pelvic girdle pain: an interview study. Clin Nurs Stud. 2014;2(2):30–41.
Ceprnja D, Chipchase L, Liamputtong P, Gupta A. “This is hard to cope with”: the lived experience and coping strategies adopted amongst Australian women with pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22:96.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04426-3
pubmed: 35109793
pmcid: 8809214
Ceprnja D, Lawless M, Liamputtong P, Gupta A, Chipchase L. Application of caring life-course theory to explore care needs in women with pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain. J Adv Nurs. 2022;78(8):2586–95.
doi: 10.1111/jan.15229
pubmed: 35301748
Persson M, Winkvist A, Dahlgren L, Mogren I. “Struggling with daily life and enduring pain”: a qualitative study of the experiences of pregnant women living with pelvic girdle pain. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:111.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-111
pubmed: 23668823
pmcid: 3661342
Elden H, Lundgren I, Robertson E. Life’s pregnant pause of pain: Pregnant women’s experiences of pelvic girdle pain related to daily life: a Swedish interview study. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2013;4(1):29–34.
doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2012.11.003
pubmed: 23427930
Gutke A, Boissonnault J, Brook G, Stuge B. The severity and impact of pelvic girdle pain and low-back pain in pregnancy: a multinational study. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018;27(4):510–7.
doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6342
pubmed: 28832267
Dufour S, Mags C Smith, Tichband L. Pregnancy-related Pelvic Girdle Pain: Irish Physiotherapist’ Perspectives. Obstet Gynecol Reprod Sci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8965/029 .
Mogren I, Winkvist A, Dahlgren L. Trust and ambivalence in midwives’ views towards women developing pelvic pain during pregnancy: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:600.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-600
pubmed: 20937158
pmcid: 2964625
Beales D, Hope J, Hoff T, Sandvik H, Wergeland O, Fary R. Current practice in management of pelvic girdle pain amongst physiotherapists in Norway and Australia. Man Ther. 2015;20(1):109–16.
doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.07.005
pubmed: 25087191
Mannava P, Durrant K, Fisher J, Chersich M, Luchters S. Attitudes and behaviours of maternal health care providers in interactions with clients: a systematic review. Global Health. 2015;11:36.
doi: 10.1186/s12992-015-0117-9
pubmed: 26276053
pmcid: 4537564
Charitou A, Fifli P, Vivilaki VG. Is empathy an important attribute of midwives and other health professionals?: A review. Eur J Midwifery. 2019;3:4.
doi: 10.18332/ejm/100612
pubmed: 33537583
pmcid: 7839101
Meyer S, Ward P. ‘How to’ use social theory within and throughout qualitative research in healthcare contexts. Sociol Compass. 2014;8(5):525–39.
doi: 10.1111/soc4.12155
Leventhal H, Brissette I, Leventhal EA. The common-sense model of self-regulation of health and illness. In: Cameron LD, Leventhal H, editors. The self-regulation of health and illness behaviour. London: Routledge; 2003. p. 42–65.
Wei H. The development of an evidence-informed Convergent Care Theory: Working together to achieve optimal health outcomes. Int J Nurs Sci. 2021;9(1):11–25.
pubmed: 35079601
pmcid: 8766786
Taylor J, Bradbury-Jones C, Kroll T, Duncan F. Health professionals’ beliefs about domestic abuse and the issue of disclosure: a critical incident technique study. Health Soc Care Community. 2013;21(5):489–99.
doi: 10.1111/hsc.12037
pubmed: 23638940
Bradbury-Jones C, Ogik P, Betts J, Taylor J, Lund P. Beliefs about people with albinism in Uganda: a qualitative study using the Common-Sense Model. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(10): e0205774.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205774
pubmed: 30312349
pmcid: 6185843
Liamputtong P. Qualitative Research Methods. 5th ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2020.
Western Sydney Local Health District. The year in review. https://www.wslhd.health.nsw.gov.au/Education-Portal/Research/Research-Categories/Centre-for-Infectious-Diseases-and-Microbiology-Public-Health/Publications/wslhd-year-in-review . Accessed 15 June 2022.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
pubmed: 17872937
Clarke V, Braun V. Thematic analysis. In: Lyons E, Coyle A, editors. Analysing qualitative data in psychology. London: Sage Publications; 2016. p. 84–103.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2014.
Australian Government Department of Health. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Pregnancy Care. https://www.health.gov.au/resources/pregnancy-care-guidelines . Accessed 28 Oct 2022.
Ryan DK, Haddow L, Ramaesh A, Kelly R, Johns EC, Denison FC, Dover AR, Reynolds RM. Early screening and treatment of gestational diabetes in high-risk women improves maternal and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective clinical audit. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;144:294–301.
doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.09.013
pubmed: 30244050
Pillay J, Donovan L, Guitard S, Zakher B, Korownyk C, Gates M, Gates A, Vandermeer B, Bougatsos C, Chou R, Hartling L. Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review to update the 2014 U.S. preventive services task force recommendation. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2021.
O’Connor E, Rossom RC, Henninger M, Groom HC, Burda BU. Primary care screening for and treatment of depression in pregnant and postpartum women: evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA. 2016;315(4):388–406.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18948
pubmed: 26813212
Siu AL, Force USPST, Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Baumann LC, Davidson KW, Ebell M, Garcia FA, Gillman M, Herzstein J, et al. Screening for depression in adults: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2016;315(4):380–7.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18392
pubmed: 26813211
McCauley M, Brown A, Ofosu B, van den Broek N. “I just wish it becomes part of routine care”: healthcare providers’ knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of screening for maternal mental health during and after pregnancy: a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19(1):279.
doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2261-x
pubmed: 31500606
pmcid: 6734443
Catling C, Rossiter C. Midwifery workplace culture in Australia: A national survey of midwives. Women Birth. 2020;33(5):464–72.
doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.09.008
pubmed: 31676324
Holmlund S, Lan PT, Edvardsson K, Ntaganira J, Graner S, Small R, Mogren I. Vietnamese midwives’ experiences of working in maternity care - a qualitative study in the Hanoi region. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2022;31: 100695.
doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100695
pubmed: 35085930
West CP, Dyrbye LN, Shanafelt TD. Physician burnout: contributors, consequences and solutions. J Intern Med. 2018;283(6):516–29.
doi: 10.1111/joim.12752
pubmed: 29505159
Stewart M. Towards a global definition of patient centred care. BMJ. 2001;322(7284):444–5.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7284.444
pubmed: 11222407
pmcid: 1119673
Shahid S, Anwar A. Provision of culturally sensitive maternity care. J Patient Care. 2015;1(1). https://doi.org/10.4172/2573-4598.1000102 .
Capper TS, Williamson M, Chee R. How is cultural safety understood and translated into midwifery practice? A scoping review and thematic analysis. Nurse Educ Pract. 2023;66: 103507.
doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103507
pubmed: 36410133
Chen XW, Jiang LY, Chen Y, Guo LF, Zhu XH. Analysis of online antenatal education class use via a mobile terminal app during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):412.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04745-5
pubmed: 35578202
pmcid: 9109660
DeNicola N, Grossman D, Marko K, Sonalkar S, Butler Tobah YS, Ganju N, Witkop CT, Henderson JT, Butler JL, Lowery C. Telehealth interventions to improve obstetric and gynecologic health outcomes: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(2):371–82.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003646
pubmed: 31977782
pmcid: 7012339
Ondersma SJ, Beatty JR, Puder KS, Janisse J, Svikis DS. Feasibility and acceptability of e-screening and brief intervention and tailored text messaging for Marijuana use in pregnancy. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019;28(9):1295–301.
doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7169
pubmed: 30657434