On-site drug detection coasters: An inadequate tool to screen for GHB and ketamine in beverages.

Coaster Drug-facilitated sexual assault (DFSA) GHB Ketamine On-site drug testing

Journal

Forensic science international
ISSN: 1872-6283
Titre abrégé: Forensic Sci Int
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 7902034

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 17 06 2023
revised: 15 08 2023
accepted: 29 08 2023
medline: 30 10 2023
pubmed: 24 9 2023
entrez: 23 9 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

With drug facilitated sexual assault (DFSA) being alleged in 15-20 % of sexual assault cases, drink spiking is a serious concern for several people, casting doubts over the expected safety at events in public spaces. On-site drug testing material is often touted as a solution, allowing attendees to test their drinks for the presence of certain so-called "date-rape drugs". In this manuscript, we aim to evaluate the efficiency of such a coaster device, manufactured by Drink Safe Technologies (Tallahassee, Florida, United States) and sold by Alco Prevention Canada (Laval, Québec, Canada), in detecting drink spiking by GHB and ketamine. From the onset, several generic arguments call into question the practicality of the test: limitations set by the manufacturer on drinks that can be tested, cost, waiting time, interpretation in suboptimal lighting and elevated limits of detection (LODs) compared to a standard recreational or impairing dose. More importantly, the test simply isn't effective at detecting the targeted drugs. The GHB test reagent was identified as bromocresol green using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). Therefore, it does not detect GHB, but any matrix with a pH higher than 5.5. The ketamine test reagent was identified as cobalt thiocyanate, a non-specific chemical commonly used in colorimetric drug testing. Performance tests were carried with more than 22 drug-free and drug-spiked (≥125 % of the LOD) matrices, including solvent solutions (water, methanol), fixed pH solutions, and an array of popular drinks (including wine, beer, cocktails and spirits). While specificity in drug-free drinks was 100 % for both GHB and ketamine, provided that the manufacturer's limitations on drinks were respected, sensitivity in drug spiked drinks (at 150 % of the LOD) was 0 % for ketamine and between 31 % and 69 % for GHB, depending on whether one classifies inconclusive results as negatives or positives. We conclude that these coasters are an inadequate tool to screen for GHB and ketamine in beverages.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37741179
pii: S0379-0738(23)00267-0
doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111817
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Sodium Oxybate 7G33012534
Ketamine 690G0D6V8H

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

111817

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Mireille Germain (M)

Laboratoire de sciences judiciaires et de médecine légale, Department of Toxicology, 1701 Parthenais Street, Montréal, Québec H2K 3S7, Canada. Electronic address: mireille.germain@msp.gouv.qc.ca.

Brigitte Desharnais (B)

Laboratoire de sciences judiciaires et de médecine légale, Department of Toxicology, 1701 Parthenais Street, Montréal, Québec H2K 3S7, Canada; Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Université de Montréal School of Public Health, PO Box 6128, Station Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada.

Julie Motard (J)

Laboratoire de sciences judiciaires et de médecine légale, Department of Toxicology, 1701 Parthenais Street, Montréal, Québec H2K 3S7, Canada.

Alexandra Doyon (A)

Laboratoire de sciences judiciaires et de médecine légale, Department of Toxicology, 1701 Parthenais Street, Montréal, Québec H2K 3S7, Canada.

Corinne Bouchard (C)

Laboratoire de sciences judiciaires et de médecine légale, Department of Toxicology, 1701 Parthenais Street, Montréal, Québec H2K 3S7, Canada.

Thierry Marcoux (T)

Laboratoire de sciences judiciaires et de médecine légale, Department of Criminalistics, 1701 Parthenais Street, Montréal, Québec H2K 3S7, Canada.

Elizabeth Audette (E)

Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry and Physics, 3351 Des Forges Blvd., Trois-Rivières, Québec G9A 5H7, Canada.

Cyril Muehlethaler (C)

Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry and Physics, 3351 Des Forges Blvd., Trois-Rivières, Québec G9A 5H7, Canada; Groupe de Recherche en Science Forensique (GRSF), 3351 Des Forges Blvd., Trois-Rivières, Québec G9A 5H7, Canada; Centre International de Criminologie Comparée (CICC), PO Box 6128, Station Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada.

Pascal Mireault (P)

Laboratoire de sciences judiciaires et de médecine légale, Department of Toxicology, 1701 Parthenais Street, Montréal, Québec H2K 3S7, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH