On-site drug detection coasters: An inadequate tool to screen for GHB and ketamine in beverages.
Coaster
Drug-facilitated sexual assault (DFSA)
GHB
Ketamine
On-site drug testing
Journal
Forensic science international
ISSN: 1872-6283
Titre abrégé: Forensic Sci Int
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 7902034
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
17
06
2023
revised:
15
08
2023
accepted:
29
08
2023
medline:
30
10
2023
pubmed:
24
9
2023
entrez:
23
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
With drug facilitated sexual assault (DFSA) being alleged in 15-20 % of sexual assault cases, drink spiking is a serious concern for several people, casting doubts over the expected safety at events in public spaces. On-site drug testing material is often touted as a solution, allowing attendees to test their drinks for the presence of certain so-called "date-rape drugs". In this manuscript, we aim to evaluate the efficiency of such a coaster device, manufactured by Drink Safe Technologies (Tallahassee, Florida, United States) and sold by Alco Prevention Canada (Laval, Québec, Canada), in detecting drink spiking by GHB and ketamine. From the onset, several generic arguments call into question the practicality of the test: limitations set by the manufacturer on drinks that can be tested, cost, waiting time, interpretation in suboptimal lighting and elevated limits of detection (LODs) compared to a standard recreational or impairing dose. More importantly, the test simply isn't effective at detecting the targeted drugs. The GHB test reagent was identified as bromocresol green using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). Therefore, it does not detect GHB, but any matrix with a pH higher than 5.5. The ketamine test reagent was identified as cobalt thiocyanate, a non-specific chemical commonly used in colorimetric drug testing. Performance tests were carried with more than 22 drug-free and drug-spiked (≥125 % of the LOD) matrices, including solvent solutions (water, methanol), fixed pH solutions, and an array of popular drinks (including wine, beer, cocktails and spirits). While specificity in drug-free drinks was 100 % for both GHB and ketamine, provided that the manufacturer's limitations on drinks were respected, sensitivity in drug spiked drinks (at 150 % of the LOD) was 0 % for ketamine and between 31 % and 69 % for GHB, depending on whether one classifies inconclusive results as negatives or positives. We conclude that these coasters are an inadequate tool to screen for GHB and ketamine in beverages.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37741179
pii: S0379-0738(23)00267-0
doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111817
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Sodium Oxybate
7G33012534
Ketamine
690G0D6V8H
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
111817Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.