A Multifaceted Implementation Strategy to Increase Out-of-Office Blood Pressure Monitoring: The EMBRACE Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 09 2023
05 09 2023
Historique:
medline:
26
9
2023
pubmed:
25
9
2023
entrez:
25
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Few primary care patients complete guideline-recommended out-of-office blood pressure (BP) monitoring prior to having hypertension diagnosed. To evaluate the effectiveness of a behavioral theory-informed, multifaceted implementation strategy on out-of-office BP monitoring (ambulatory BP monitoring [ABPM] or home BP monitoring [HBPM]) among patients with new hypertension. This 2-group, pre-post cluster randomized trial was conducted within a primary care network of 8 practices (4 intervention practices with 99 clinicians; 4 control practices with 55 clinicians) and 1186 patients (857 intervention; 329 control) with at least 1 visit with elevated office BP and no prior hypertension diagnosis between October 2016 and September 2017 (preimplementation period) or between April 2018 and March 2019 (postimplementation period). Data were analyzed from February to July 2023. Usual care (control group) or a multifaceted implementation strategy consisting of an accessible ABPM service; electronic health record (EHR) tools to facilitate test ordering; clinician education, reminders, and feedback relevant to out-of-office BP monitoring; nurse training on HBPM; and patient information handouts. The primary outcome was patient completion of out-of-office BP monitoring within 6 months of an eligible visit. Secondary outcomes included clinician ordering of out-of-office BP monitoring. Blinded assessors extracted outcomes from the EHR. A total of 1186 patients (857 intervention; 329 control) were included, with a mean (SD) age of 54 (16) years; 808 (68%) were female, and 549 (48%) were Spanish speaking; among those with race and ethnicity documented, 123 (10%) were Black or African American, and 368 (31%) were Hispanic. Among intervention practices, the percentage of visits resulting in completed out-of-office BP monitoring increased from 0.6% (0% ABPM; 0.6% HBPM) to 5.7% (3.7% ABPM; 2.0% HBPM) between the preimplementation and postimplementation periods (P = .009). Among control practices, the percentage of visits resulting in completed out-of-office BP monitoring changed from 5.4% (0% ABPM; 5.4% HBPM) to 4.3% (0% ABPM; 4.3% HBPM) during the corresponding period (P = .94). The ratio of relative risks (RRs) of out-of-office BP monitoring in the postimplementation vs preimplementation periods for intervention vs control practices was 10.5 (95% CI, 1.9-58.0; P = .01). The ratio of RRs of out-of-office BP monitoring being ordered was 2.2 (95% CI, 0.8-6.3; P = .12). This study found that a theory-informed implementation strategy that included access to ABPM modestly increased out-of-office BP monitoring among patients with elevated office BP but no hypertension diagnosis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03480217.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37747734
pii: 2809842
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.34646
pmc: PMC10520739
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03480217']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2334646Subventions
Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : R01 HS024262
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL152699
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002384
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001873
Pays : United States
Références
Am J Hypertens. 2012 Apr;25(4):458-63
pubmed: 22258335
Hypertension. 2013 Dec;62(6):982-7
pubmed: 24041952
Am J Hypertens. 2018 Jul 16;31(8):919-927
pubmed: 29788130
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008 Jun;10(6):467-76
pubmed: 18550937
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e213718
pubmed: 33904917
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Feb 3;162(3):192-204
pubmed: 25531400
Hypertension. 2006 Jan;47(1):29-34
pubmed: 16344364
Lancet. 2011 Oct 1;378(9798):1219-30
pubmed: 21868086
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
Implement Sci. 2020 Aug 8;15(1):63
pubmed: 32771002
Am J Med. 2015 Jan;128(1):14-20
pubmed: 25107387
J Hypertens. 2016 Aug;34(8):1655-8
pubmed: 27356004
Implement Sci. 2017 Nov 14;12(1):134
pubmed: 29137666
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 3;163(9):691-700
pubmed: 26457954
JAMA. 1988 Jan 8;259(2):225-8
pubmed: 3336140
Am J Hypertens. 2017 Nov 1;30(11):1126-1132
pubmed: 28633432
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;57(8):785-94
pubmed: 15485730
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2017 Sep;11(9):573-580
pubmed: 28734798
BMJ. 2012 Sep 04;345:e5661
pubmed: 22951546
BMC Psychol. 2015 Sep 16;3:32
pubmed: 26376626
Am J Hypertens. 1994 Sep;7(9 Pt 1):848-52
pubmed: 7811445
Blood Press Monit. 2013 Feb;18(1):1-7
pubmed: 23263535
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37
pubmed: 22530986
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014 Dec;8(12):891-7
pubmed: 25492832
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Dec;21(12):1803-1809
pubmed: 31642596
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Sep;37(12):2948-2956
pubmed: 35239109
Int J Cardiol Hypertens. 2020 Jun 01;6:100033
pubmed: 33447762
Circulation. 2000 Sep 5;102(10):1139-44
pubmed: 10973843
JAMA. 2021 Apr 27;325(16):1650-1656
pubmed: 33904861
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Jan 25;4(1):10
pubmed: 36698220
Hypertension. 2022 Feb;79(2):e15-e17
pubmed: 34852639