From lazy to rich to exclusive task representations in neural networks and neural codes.


Journal

Current opinion in neurobiology
ISSN: 1873-6882
Titre abrégé: Curr Opin Neurobiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9111376

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 16 03 2023
revised: 04 08 2023
accepted: 16 08 2023
medline: 5 12 2023
pubmed: 28 9 2023
entrez: 27 9 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Neural circuits-both in the brain and in "artificial" neural network models-learn to solve a remarkable variety of tasks, and there is a great current opportunity to use neural networks as models for brain function. Key to this endeavor is the ability to characterize the representations formed by both artificial and biological brains. Here, we investigate this potential through the lens of recently developing theory that characterizes neural networks as "lazy" or "rich" depending on the approach they use to solve tasks: lazy networks solve tasks by making small changes in connectivity, while rich networks solve tasks by significantly modifying weights throughout the network (including "hidden layers"). We further elucidate rich networks through the lens of compression and "neural collapse", ideas that have recently been of significant interest to neuroscience and machine learning. We then show how these ideas apply to a domain of increasing importance to both fields: extracting latent structures through self-supervised learning.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37757585
pii: S0959-4388(23)00105-8
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2023.102780
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102780

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Matthew Farrell (M)

John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, United States.

Stefano Recanatesi (S)

Applied Mathematics, Physiology and Biophysics, and Computational Neuroscience Center, University of Washington, United States.

Eric Shea-Brown (E)

Applied Mathematics, Physiology and Biophysics, and Computational Neuroscience Center, University of Washington, United States. Electronic address: etsb@uw.edu.

Articles similaires

Exploring blood-brain barrier passage using atomic weighted vector and machine learning.

Yoan Martínez-López, Paulina Phoobane, Yanaima Jauriga et al.
1.00
Blood-Brain Barrier Machine Learning Humans Support Vector Machine Software

Understanding the role of machine learning in predicting progression of osteoarthritis.

Simone Castagno, Benjamin Gompels, Estelle Strangmark et al.
1.00
Humans Disease Progression Machine Learning Osteoarthritis
1.00
Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Infant, Newborn Infant, Premature
alpha-Synuclein Humans Animals Mice Lewy Body Disease

Classifications MeSH