Effects of different sponge implantation methods of negative pressure wound therapy on wound healing of deep surgical site infection after spinal surgery.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
29
05
2023
accepted:
07
09
2023
medline:
2
10
2023
pubmed:
28
9
2023
entrez:
28
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
After spinal surgery, negative pressure wound treatment (NPWT) improves deep surgical site infection (DSSI) wound healing. This research compared the healing benefits of two sponge implantation strategies in NPWT for DSSI. 21 patients with DSSI utilized NPWT to improve wound healing following spine surgery were followed from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2021. After antibiotic treatment failure, all these patients with DSSI received extensive debridement and NPWT. They are grouped by sponge placement method: centripetal reduction and segment reduction. The two groups' hospital stays, NPWT replacement frequency, wound healing time, healing speed, and quality of wound healing (POSAS score) were compared. All patients had been cured by the end of December 2022, and the mean follow-up time was 57.48 ± 29.6 months. Surgical incision length did not vary across groups (15.75±7.61 vs. 15.46±7.38 cm, P = 0.747). The segmental reduction approach had shorter hospital stay and NPWT treatment times than the centripetal reduction method (39.25±16.04 vs. 77.38±37.24 days, P = 0.027). Although there is no statistically significant difference, the mean wound healing duration of segmental reduction group is faster than that of centripetal reduction group (0.82±0.39 vs 0.45±0.28 cm/d, P = 0.238), wound healing quality (POSAS) (33.54±8.63 vs 48.13±12.17, P = 0.408) is better in segmental reduction group, and NPWT replacement frequency (2.62 ± 1.04 vs 3.88 ± 1.25, P < .915) is smaller in segmental reduction group. NPWT heals wounds and controls infection. Segmental reduction method accelerates wound healing, reduces hospital stay, and improves wound quality compared to central reduction method.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37768971
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291858
pii: PONE-D-23-14685
pmc: PMC10538705
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0291858Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 May;6(5):407-11
pubmed: 17542505
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jun;278(6):1743-1753
pubmed: 33677741
Int Wound J. 2007 Sep;4(3):256-69
pubmed: 17924882
J Surg Oncol. 2017 Oct;116(5):592-600
pubmed: 28940567
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jun;113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7
pubmed: 15253184
Neurosurgery. 2002 Aug;51(2):391-400; discussion 400-1
pubmed: 12182777
Exp Ther Med. 2013 May;5(5):1375-1380
pubmed: 23737883
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;127:e389-e395
pubmed: 30905647
Eur Spine J. 2018 Oct;27(10):2469-2480
pubmed: 30128761
Int Orthop. 2022 Nov;46(11):2629-2635
pubmed: 35931831
World Neurosurg. 2019 Mar;123:e318-e329
pubmed: 30496932
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 13;11(2):
pubmed: 35054083
J Spinal Disord. 2000 Oct;13(5):422-6
pubmed: 11052352
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jul 1;37(15):1340-5
pubmed: 22210012
Int Orthop. 2012 Feb;36(2):439-44
pubmed: 22159548
Spine J. 2013 Oct;13(10):1393-405
pubmed: 23981819
Int Wound J. 2009 Aug;6 Suppl 1:1-26
pubmed: 19614789
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2016 Dec;30(4):909-929
pubmed: 27816143
Neurol Res. 2016 Feb;38(2):117-23
pubmed: 27118607
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2011 Dec;40(12):E264-71
pubmed: 22268020
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 May 15;29(10):1066-8
pubmed: 15131430
Eur Spine J. 2006 Sep;15(9):1388-96
pubmed: 16835734
World Neurosurg. 2016 Nov;95:507-515
pubmed: 26054871
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Dec;16(12):e288-e303
pubmed: 27816414
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Mar;90(3):377-81
pubmed: 18310764
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jan;90(1):62-9
pubmed: 18171958