The impact of water quality on the formation of halogenated benzoquinones and the adsorption efficiency by activated carbon.


Journal

Journal of environmental sciences (China)
ISSN: 1001-0742
Titre abrégé: J Environ Sci (China)
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 100967627

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 16 11 2022
revised: 01 02 2023
accepted: 01 02 2023
medline: 3 10 2023
pubmed: 2 10 2023
entrez: 1 10 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Halogenated benzoquinones (HBQs) could cause bladder cancer, but there were few related studies on the generation and control. In this study, the impact of different precursors, pH, bromide concentration, and algae-derived organic matters on the formation of HBQs and the removal efficiency by activated carbon were investigated. It was found that the chlorination of bisphenol A produced the most 2,6-dichloro-1,4-benzoquinone (2,6-DCBQ), reaching 14.86 µg/L at 1 hr, followed by tyrosine, 2-chlorophenol, P-hydroxybenzoic acid, trichlorophenol, and N-methylaniline. The production of 2,6-DCBQ increased first and then decreased from 0 to 36 hr (chlorination doses 0-20 mg/L), indicating that HBQs were unstable in water. Trihalomethanes (THMs) were detected during chlorination, and the concentration increased with prolongation of reaction time. 2,6-DCBQ production decreased and 2,6-dibromo-1,4-benzoquinone (2,6-DBBQ) production increased with increment bromide concentration and the bromide promoted the formation of tribromomethane. The production of 2,6-DCBQ decreased with increase of pH, and the maximum production was 141.38 µg/L at pH of 5. Microcystis aeruginosa, Chlorella algae cells, and intracellular organic matters (IOM) could be chlorinated as potential precursors for HBQs. The most amount of 2,6-DCBQ was generated from algae cells of Microcystis aeruginosa, followed by Chlorella algae cells, Microcystis aeruginosa IOM, and Chlorella IOM. This study compared the removal efficiency of HBQs by granular activated carbon (GAC) and columnar activated carbon (CAC) under different carbon doses and initial concentrations of HBQs. It was found that the removal efficiency by GAC (80.1%) was higher than that by CAC (51.8%), indicating that GAC has better control for HBQs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37778839
pii: S1001-0742(23)00049-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2023.02.002
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

2,6-dichlorobenzoquinone 697-91-6
Charcoal 16291-96-6
Bromides 0
Benzoquinones 0
quinone 3T006GV98U
Water Pollutants, Chemical 0
Drinking Water 0
Disinfectants 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

693-702

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Yongjing Wang (Y)

State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Food Chain Pollution Control, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China; Key Laboratory of Cleaner Production and Integrated Resource Utilization of China National Light Industry, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China.

Song Gao (S)

State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Food Chain Pollution Control, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China.

Xinyu Yan (X)

State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Food Chain Pollution Control, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China.

Songtao Wang (S)

State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Food Chain Pollution Control, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China.

Ruolin Zhang (R)

Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, Beijing 100038, China.

Yan Zhou (Y)

State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Food Chain Pollution Control, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China.

Lianhai Ren (L)

State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Food Chain Pollution Control, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China. Electronic address: renlh@th.btbu.edu.cn.

Cheng Li (C)

Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China. Electronic address: Lic@iqstt.cn.

Articles similaires

Nigeria Environmental Monitoring Solid Waste Waste Disposal Facilities Refuse Disposal

Hydrochemical characterization and pCO

Kunarika Bhanot, M K Sharma, R D Kaushik
1.00
Rivers Environmental Monitoring Carbon Dioxide Water Pollutants, Chemical India
Wetlands Massachusetts Chlorides Groundwater Environmental Monitoring
Water Quality Bays Environmental Monitoring Remote Sensing Technology Chlorophyll

Classifications MeSH