Microtubules oppose cortical actomyosin-driven membrane ingression during C. elegans meiosis I polar body extrusion.


Journal

PLoS genetics
ISSN: 1553-7404
Titre abrégé: PLoS Genet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101239074

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2023
Historique:
received: 22 05 2023
accepted: 19 09 2023
revised: 12 10 2023
medline: 23 10 2023
pubmed: 2 10 2023
entrez: 2 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

During C. elegans oocyte meiosis I cytokinesis and polar body extrusion, cortical actomyosin is locally remodeled to assemble a contractile ring that forms within and remains part of a much larger and actively contractile cortical actomyosin network. This network both mediates contractile ring dynamics and generates shallow ingressions throughout the oocyte cortex during polar body extrusion. Based on our analysis of requirements for CLS-2, a member of the CLASP family of proteins that stabilize microtubules, we recently proposed that a balance of actomyosin-mediated tension and microtubule-mediated stiffness limits membrane ingression throughout the oocyte during meiosis I polar body extrusion. Here, using live cell imaging and fluorescent protein fusions, we show that CLS-2 is part of a group of kinetochore proteins, including the scaffold KNL-1 and the kinase BUB-1, that also co-localize during meiosis I to structures called linear elements, which are present within the assembling oocyte spindle and also are distributed throughout the oocyte in proximity to, but appearing to underlie, the actomyosin cortex. We further show that KNL-1 and BUB-1, like CLS-2, promote the proper organization of sub-cortical microtubules and also limit membrane ingression throughout the oocyte. Moreover, nocodazole or taxol treatment to destabilize or stabilize oocyte microtubules leads to, respectively, excess or decreased membrane ingression throughout the oocyte. Furthermore, taxol treatment, and genetic backgrounds that elevate the levels of cortically associated microtubules, both suppress excess membrane ingression in cls-2 mutant oocytes. We propose that linear elements influence the organization of sub-cortical microtubules to generate a stiffness that limits cortical actomyosin-driven membrane ingression throughout the oocyte during meiosis I polar body extrusion. We discuss the possibility that this regulation of sub-cortical microtubule dynamics facilitates actomyosin contractile ring dynamics during C. elegans oocyte meiosis I cell division.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37782660
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010984
pii: PGENETICS-D-23-00571
pmc: PMC10569601
doi:

Substances chimiques

Actomyosin 9013-26-7
Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins 0
Paclitaxel P88XT4IS4D
KNL-1 protein, C elegans 0
Microtubule-Associated Proteins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e1010984

Subventions

Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : T32 HD007348
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R35 GM131749
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : UpdateOf

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Quiogue et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Nat Cell Biol. 2005 Dec;7(12):1248-55
pubmed: 16273096
Dev Biol. 2011 Nov 1;359(1):137-148
pubmed: 21889938
Blood. 2008 May 1;111(9):4605-16
pubmed: 18230754
Nat Commun. 2014 Oct 31;5:5325
pubmed: 25358863
Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 2;8(1):1266
pubmed: 29097687
Elife. 2017 Nov 20;6:
pubmed: 29154753
J Cell Sci. 2007 Dec 15;120(Pt 24):4416-25
pubmed: 18042620
J Cell Biol. 2008 Feb 25;180(4):739-46
pubmed: 18283112
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2020 Oct;66:69-78
pubmed: 32580115
Dev Cell. 2018 Aug 6;46(3):257-270.e5
pubmed: 30032990
Nature. 2022 Sep;609(7927):597-604
pubmed: 35978196
Elife. 2023 Feb 17;12:
pubmed: 36799894
ACS Nano. 2021 Nov 23;15(11):17528-17548
pubmed: 34677937
Nat Cell Biol. 2010 Sep;12(9):894-901
pubmed: 20729837
Nat Cell Biol. 2010 Dec;12(12):1235-41
pubmed: 21076413
Dev Cell. 2022 Oct 24;57(20):2412-2425.e6
pubmed: 36243013
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022 Feb 07;10:769862
pubmed: 35198555
Development. 2015 Dec 15;142(24):4374-84
pubmed: 26552885
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015 Dec;16(12):711-26
pubmed: 26562752
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008 Jul;65(14):2128-37
pubmed: 18344022
Mol Biol Cell. 2016 Nov 7;27(22):3385-3394
pubmed: 27385332
IEEE Trans Image Process. 1995;4(3):370-8
pubmed: 18289986
Genetics. 2019 Jan;211(1):35-73
pubmed: 30626640
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2018 Feb;50:79-85
pubmed: 29482169
PLoS Genet. 2013 May;9(5):e1003510
pubmed: 23671426
Mol Biol Cell. 2021 Feb 1;32(3):211-217
pubmed: 33507109
Curr Biol. 2008 Jan 22;18(2):91-101
pubmed: 18207738
Mol Biol Cell. 2017 Sep 1;28(18):2410-2419
pubmed: 28701347
Soft Matter. 2020 Aug 21;16(31):7191-7201
pubmed: 32207504
Dev Cell. 2021 Sep 13;56(17):2486-2500.e6
pubmed: 34480876
Blood. 2015 Jan 29;125(5):860-8
pubmed: 25411426
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Feb;2(2):138-45
pubmed: 11252955
Nat Cell Biol. 2017 Jun;19(6):689-697
pubmed: 28530659
Elife. 2020 Dec 07;9:
pubmed: 33284105
Curr Biol. 2018 Sep 24;28(18):2991-2997.e2
pubmed: 30197085
Dev Biol. 1983 Nov;100(1):64-119
pubmed: 6684600
Biomolecules. 2022 Dec 16;12(12):
pubmed: 36551317
Development. 2017 May 1;144(9):1674-1686
pubmed: 28289130
Curr Biol. 2022 Nov 7;32(21):4660-4674.e6
pubmed: 36174574
Nature. 2003 Jan 16;421(6920):231-7
pubmed: 12529635
J Cell Biol. 2015 Sep 14;210(6):917-32
pubmed: 26370499
Mol Biol Cell. 2010 Aug 1;21(15):2707-20
pubmed: 20554764
Curr Biol. 2010 Nov 23;20(22):2046-51
pubmed: 21055941
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010 Apr;11(4):276-87
pubmed: 20308985
J Cell Biol. 2001 Jun 11;153(6):1227-38
pubmed: 11402066
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019 Jan;20(1):38-54
pubmed: 30323238
PLoS One. 2009 Sep 29;4(9):e7171
pubmed: 19787051
Development. 2007 Nov;134(21):3837-48
pubmed: 17913784
J Cell Biol. 2012 Oct 15;199(2):285-301
pubmed: 23045552
Trends Cell Biol. 2011 Oct;21(10):604-14
pubmed: 21782439
J Cell Biol. 2003 Jan 20;160(2):255-65
pubmed: 12538643
PLoS Genet. 2023 Jan 6;19(1):e1010363
pubmed: 36608115
Biol Open. 2020 Jun 25;9(6):
pubmed: 32493729
PLoS Biol. 2010 Nov 30;8(11):e1000544
pubmed: 21151339
Elife. 2020 Dec 23;9:
pubmed: 33355089
J Cell Sci. 2018 Jul 19;131(14):
pubmed: 30026344
Curr Biol. 2018 Nov 5;28(21):3408-3421.e8
pubmed: 30415699
Cytoskeleton (Hoboken). 2012 Nov;69(11):855-68
pubmed: 22927361
Curr Biol. 2005 Apr 26;15(8):771-7
pubmed: 15854912
Mol Biol Cell. 2009 Jun;20(11):2722-30
pubmed: 19357192
PLoS Genet. 2007 Jul;3(7):e113
pubmed: 17630834
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jul 21;106(29):11972-7
pubmed: 19574460
PLoS Genet. 2020 Oct 7;16(10):e1008751
pubmed: 33027250
Trends Cell Biol. 2020 Jul;30(7):556-565
pubmed: 32278656

Auteurs

Alyssa R Quiogue (AR)

Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugen, Oregon, United States of America.

Eisuke Sumiyoshi (E)

Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugen, Oregon, United States of America.

Adam Fries (A)

Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugen, Oregon, United States of America.
Imaging Core, Office of the Vice President for Research University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.

Chien-Hui Chuang (CH)

Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugen, Oregon, United States of America.

Bruce Bowerman (B)

Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugen, Oregon, United States of America.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Meiosis Schizosaccharomyces Schizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins Spores, Fungal
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice

Classifications MeSH