AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 8.b: Linear accelerator performance tests.
IMRT
MPPG
TG-142
TG-198
VMAT
baseline
commissioning
external beam
guideline
linac
percentage depth dose
primary reference data
profiles
quality assurance
Journal
Journal of applied clinical medical physics
ISSN: 1526-9914
Titre abrégé: J Appl Clin Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101089176
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Nov 2023
Historique:
revised:
23
06
2023
received:
11
05
2023
accepted:
24
08
2023
medline:
16
11
2023
pubmed:
4
10
2023
entrez:
4
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this guideline is to provide a list of critical performance tests to assist the Qualified Medical Physicist (QMP) in establishing and maintaining a safe and effective quality assurance (QA) program. The performance tests on a linear accelerator (linac) should be selected to fit the clinical patterns of use of the accelerator and care should be given to perform tests which are relevant to detecting errors related to the specific use of the accelerator. Current recommendations for linac QA were reviewed to determine any changes required to those tests highlighted by the original report as well as considering new components of the treatment process that have become common since its publication. Recommendations are made on the acquisition of reference data, routine establishment of machine isocenter, basing performance tests on clinical use of the linac, working with vendors to establish QA tests and performing tests after maintenance and upgrades. The recommended tests proposed in this guideline were chosen based on consensus of the guideline's committee after assessing necessary changes from the previous report. The tests are grouped together by class of test (e.g., dosimetry, mechanical, etc.) and clinical parameter tested. Implementation notes are included for each test so that the QMP can understand the overall goal of each test. This guideline will assist the QMP in developing a comprehensive QA program for linacs in the external beam radiation therapy setting. The committee sought to prioritize tests by their implication on quality and patient safety. The QMP is ultimately responsible for implementing appropriate tests. In the spirit of the report from American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 100, individual institutions are encouraged to analyze the risks involved in their own clinical practice and determine which performance tests are relevant in their own radiotherapy clinics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37793084
doi: 10.1002/acm2.14160
pmc: PMC10647991
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e14160Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
Med Phys. 2009 Nov;36(11):5359-73
pubmed: 19994544
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Nov 08;17(6):242-253
pubmed: 27929497
Med Phys. 2012 Jul;39(7):4228-38
pubmed: 22830756
Med Phys. 2016 Jul;43(7):4209
pubmed: 27370140
Med Phys. 2012 Apr;39(4):1946-63
pubmed: 22482616
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Jun;22(6):11-15
pubmed: 34018313
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012 Sep 06;13(5):3856
pubmed: 22955651
Med Phys. 2018 Apr;45(4):e53-e83
pubmed: 29443390
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Nov;19(6):11-25
pubmed: 30338913
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2004 Sep;27(3):111-7
pubmed: 15580840
Med Phys. 2021 Oct;48(10):e830-e885
pubmed: 34036590
Med Phys. 2011 Jun;38(6):2914-36
pubmed: 21815366
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 May 1;98(1):56-62
pubmed: 28587053
Med Phys. 2018 Nov;45(11):e1123-e1145
pubmed: 30247757
Med Phys. 2019 Jun;46(6):2541-2555
pubmed: 30974485
Med Phys. 2017 Nov;44(11):5575-5583
pubmed: 28862765
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2019 Sep-Oct;24(5):421-427
pubmed: 31367194
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Nov;24(11):e14160
pubmed: 37793084
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Sep;22(9):73-81
pubmed: 34272810
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Jul;18(4):23-39
pubmed: 28548315
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011 Nov 15;12(4):3645
pubmed: 22089022
Cureus. 2021 Jun 29;13(6):e16038
pubmed: 34239800
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Jul 1;74(3):852-8
pubmed: 19409731
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan-Dec;18:1533033819876897
pubmed: 31707931
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Nov;20(11):4-5
pubmed: 31633873
Med Phys. 2022 Apr;49(4):e82-e112
pubmed: 35179229
Med Phys. 1999 Sep;26(9):1847-70
pubmed: 10505874
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Nov 1;84(3):e263-9
pubmed: 22682808
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Aug;23(8):e13699
pubmed: 35856943
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jan - Feb;10(1):e8-e15
pubmed: 31408733
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1988 Feb;14(2):373-81
pubmed: 3276655
Med Phys. 2009 Sep;36(9):4197-212
pubmed: 19810494
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Sep;18(5):10-21
pubmed: 28786239
Am J Clin Oncol. 2020 Aug;43(8):545-552
pubmed: 32404596
Med Phys. 2010 Aug;37(8):4078-101
pubmed: 20879569
Med Phys. 2016 Jun;43(6):2933-2935
pubmed: 27277042
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Sep;23(9):e13641
pubmed: 35950259
Med Phys. 2014 Apr;41(4):041501
pubmed: 24694120
Med Phys. 1994 Apr;21(4):581-618
pubmed: 8058027
Med Phys. 2021 Oct;48(10):e886-e921
pubmed: 34101836