Evaluation and validation of reference genes for RT-qPCR gene expression in Naegleria gruberi.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 10 2023
05 10 2023
Historique:
received:
26
05
2023
accepted:
29
09
2023
medline:
9
10
2023
pubmed:
6
10
2023
entrez:
5
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Naegleria gruberi is a free-living amoeboflagellate commonly found in freshwater and in soils around the world. It is a non-pathogenic relative of Naegleria fowleri, which is the etiologic agent of Primary Amoebic Meningoencephalitis (PAM). PAM occurs world-wide and it is considered a rare disease, but its fatality rate is high (96%) mainly because of delay in initiation of treatment due to misdiagnosis and lack of a specific treatment. The analysis of gene expression by quantitative real-time PCR in N. gruberi could be a highly efficient means to understand the pathogenicity of N. fowleri and also to find drug targets. Accurate RT-qPCR analysis requires correct normalization of gene expression data using reference genes (RG), whose expression should be constant under different experimental conditions. In this study, six genes, representing the most frequently used housekeeping genes, were selected for evaluation as reference genes in N. gruberi. The expression and stability of these genes was evaluated employing four algorithms (geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper and RefFinder). This work shows significant variations of the stability of RGs depending on the algorithms employed and on the experimental conditions (i.e. logarithmic, stationary, heat-shock and oxidative stress). The geNorm, NormFinder and RefFinder analysis of all the experimental conditions in combination revealed that ACT and G6PD were the most stable RGs. While BestKeeper analysis showed that 18S and TBP were the most stable RGs. Moreover, normalization of HSP90 gene expression with the most stable RGs resulted in an upregulation whereas when the normalization was done with the unstable RGs, the gene expression was not reliable. Hence, the implications of this study are relevant to gene expression studies in N. gruberi.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37798308
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43892-3
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-43892-3
pmc: PMC10555999
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
16748Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Sci Rep. 2021 May 13;11(1):10253
pubmed: 33986374
Bioinformatics. 2018 Jun 1;34(11):1937-1938
pubmed: 29360956
Trends Parasitol. 2020 Jan;36(1):19-28
pubmed: 31744676
Gene. 2016 Apr 25;581(1):21-30
pubmed: 26778241
Parasite. 2021;28:36
pubmed: 33843581
Nat Protoc. 2006;1(3):1559-82
pubmed: 17406449
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 22;10(9):e0138331
pubmed: 26393928
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jan 31;10:66
pubmed: 30766520
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 10;12(1):313
pubmed: 35013399
J Biomol Tech. 2004 Sep;15(3):155-66
pubmed: 15331581
Cancer Res. 2004 Aug 1;64(15):5245-50
pubmed: 15289330
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 16;10(1):11688
pubmed: 32678232
Redox Biol. 2014;3:25-8
pubmed: 25462062
Genome Biol. 2002 Jun 18;3(7):RESEARCH0034
pubmed: 12184808
Microbiology (Reading). 2008 Dec;154(Pt 12):3895-3904
pubmed: 19047756
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 24;9(1):10703
pubmed: 31341190
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Nov;59(11):6677-81
pubmed: 26259797
FASEB J. 1994 Feb;8(2):174-81
pubmed: 8119488
Plant Mol Biol. 2012 Jan 31;:
pubmed: 22290409
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 27;13(1):1555
pubmed: 36707665
Int J Parasitol. 2018 Aug;48(9-10):719-727
pubmed: 29738737
Exp Cell Res. 1974 Oct;88(2):365-70
pubmed: 4609782
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 8;11(1):23691
pubmed: 34880360
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Aug 01;19(8):
pubmed: 30071669
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 1;10(1):16354
pubmed: 33004977
Curr Biol. 2022 Mar 28;32(6):1247-1261.e6
pubmed: 35139359
Pathogens. 2021 Mar 24;10(4):
pubmed: 33804993
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 25;10(1):10362
pubmed: 32587282
Adv Hum Genet. 1985;14:217-329, 386-8
pubmed: 3887862
Cytoskeleton (Hoboken). 2010 Oct;67(10):630-4
pubmed: 20737541
Annu Rev Biophys. 2011;40:169-86
pubmed: 21314430
FEBS Lett. 2004 Mar 26;562(1-3):11-5
pubmed: 15069952
J Proteomics. 2008 Oct 7;71(4):391-411
pubmed: 18718564
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 5;11(1):21711
pubmed: 34741052
Plant Biotechnol J. 2008 Aug;6(6):609-18
pubmed: 18433420
Genes Immun. 2005 Jun;6(4):279-84
pubmed: 15815687
Biotechnol Lett. 2004 Mar;26(6):509-15
pubmed: 15127793
J Mol Endocrinol. 2005 Jun;34(3):597-601
pubmed: 15956331
Lancet. 2008 Jan 5;371(9606):64-74
pubmed: 18177777
Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2020 Dec;14:126-135
pubmed: 33096396
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2010 Jul;172(1):52-5
pubmed: 20302889
BMC Biol. 2021 Jul 22;19(1):142
pubmed: 34294116
Biotechniques. 2000 Aug;29(2):332-7
pubmed: 10948434
Mol Cell Probes. 2005 Apr;19(2):101-9
pubmed: 15680211
J Biotechnol. 1999 Oct 8;75(2-3):291-5
pubmed: 10617337
Am J Physiol. 1999 May;276(5):C1121-31
pubmed: 10329961
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 1;73(1):e19-e27
pubmed: 32369575
Clin Chim Acta. 2007 Oct;385(1-2):1-5
pubmed: 17698053
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Aug 14;8(8):e3017
pubmed: 25121759
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 16;9(1):13291
pubmed: 31527603
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2010 Jul;8(4):201-6
pubmed: 20970721
Parasit Vectors. 2020 Jan 29;13(1):41
pubmed: 31996242
J Insect Sci. 2021 Sep 1;21(5):
pubmed: 34591086
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 4;11(1):21662
pubmed: 34737406