"Everything's so Role-Specific": VA Employee Perspectives' on Electronic Health Record (EHR) Transition Implications for Roles and Responsibilities.
EHR
EHR transitions
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
care roles
interface
role scope
user experience
workflow
Journal
Journal of general internal medicine
ISSN: 1525-1497
Titre abrégé: J Gen Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8605834
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2023
10 2023
Historique:
received:
02
12
2022
accepted:
13
06
2023
medline:
27
10
2023
pubmed:
6
10
2023
entrez:
5
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Electronic health record (EHR) transitions are increasingly widespread and often highly disruptive. It is imperative we learn from past experiences to anticipate and mitigate such disruptions. Veterans Affairs (VA) is undergoing a large-scale transition from its homegrown EHR (CPRS/Vista) to a commercial EHR (Cerner), creating a unique opportunity of shedding light on large-scale EHR-to-EHR transition challenges. To explore one facet of the organizational impact of VA's EHR transition: its implications for employees' roles and responsibilities at the first VA site to implement Cerner Millennium EHR. As part of a formative evaluation of frontline staff experiences with VA's EHR transition, we conducted brief (~ 15 min) and full-length interviews (~ 60 min) with clinicians and staff at Mann-Grandstaff VA Medical Center in Spokane, WA, before, during, and after transition (July 2020-November 2021). We conducted 111 interviews with 26 Spokane clinicians and staff, recruited via snowball sampling. We conducted audio interviews using a semi-structured guide with grounded prompts. We coded interview transcripts using a priori and emergent codes, followed by qualitative content analysis. Unlike VA's previous EHR, Cerner imposes additional restrictions on access to its EHR functionality based upon "roles" assigned to users. Participants described a mismatch between established institutional duties and their EHR permissions, unanticipated changes in scope of duties brought upon by the transition, as well as impediments to communication and collaboration due to different role-based views. Health systems should anticipate substantive impacts on professional workflows when EHR role settings do not reflect prior workflows. Such changes may increase user error, dissatisfaction, and patient care disruptions. To mitigate employee dissatisfaction and safety risks, health systems should proactively plan for and communicate about expected modifications and monitor for unintended role-related consequences of EHR transitions, while vendors should ensure accurate role configuration and assignment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Electronic health record (EHR) transitions are increasingly widespread and often highly disruptive. It is imperative we learn from past experiences to anticipate and mitigate such disruptions. Veterans Affairs (VA) is undergoing a large-scale transition from its homegrown EHR (CPRS/Vista) to a commercial EHR (Cerner), creating a unique opportunity of shedding light on large-scale EHR-to-EHR transition challenges.
OBJECTIVE
To explore one facet of the organizational impact of VA's EHR transition: its implications for employees' roles and responsibilities at the first VA site to implement Cerner Millennium EHR.
DESIGN
As part of a formative evaluation of frontline staff experiences with VA's EHR transition, we conducted brief (~ 15 min) and full-length interviews (~ 60 min) with clinicians and staff at Mann-Grandstaff VA Medical Center in Spokane, WA, before, during, and after transition (July 2020-November 2021).
PARTICIPANTS
We conducted 111 interviews with 26 Spokane clinicians and staff, recruited via snowball sampling.
APPROACH
We conducted audio interviews using a semi-structured guide with grounded prompts. We coded interview transcripts using a priori and emergent codes, followed by qualitative content analysis.
KEY RESULTS
Unlike VA's previous EHR, Cerner imposes additional restrictions on access to its EHR functionality based upon "roles" assigned to users. Participants described a mismatch between established institutional duties and their EHR permissions, unanticipated changes in scope of duties brought upon by the transition, as well as impediments to communication and collaboration due to different role-based views.
CONCLUSIONS
Health systems should anticipate substantive impacts on professional workflows when EHR role settings do not reflect prior workflows. Such changes may increase user error, dissatisfaction, and patient care disruptions. To mitigate employee dissatisfaction and safety risks, health systems should proactively plan for and communicate about expected modifications and monitor for unintended role-related consequences of EHR transitions, while vendors should ensure accurate role configuration and assignment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37798577
doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08282-5
pii: 10.1007/s11606-023-08282-5
pmc: PMC10593626
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
991-998Subventions
Organisme : Quality Enhancement Research Initiative
ID : PEC 20-168
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb;49(1 Pt 2):405-20
pubmed: 24359533
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Sep-Oct;13(5):547-56
pubmed: 16799128
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Sep-Oct;12(5):505-16
pubmed: 15905487
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Mar 31;9(3):e18534
pubmed: 33626016
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Aug;81(8):539-48
pubmed: 22465355
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):1053-9
pubmed: 24951796
BMJ. 2005 Dec 3;331(7528):1313-6
pubmed: 16269467
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 May-Jun;28(3):316-23
pubmed: 25957364
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 20;16(10):
pubmed: 31137472
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Aug;84(8):578-94
pubmed: 25910685
BMJ. 2016 Jul 28;354:i3835
pubmed: 27471242
Healthc (Amst). 2018 Mar;6(1):7-12
pubmed: 28716376
Health Commun. 2017 Aug;32(8):1004-1013
pubmed: 27463257
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 16;360(16):1628-38
pubmed: 19321858
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Apr 13;29(5):1014-1018
pubmed: 35022741
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1317-1331
pubmed: 30193239
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15
pubmed: 18352969
Health Policy. 2018 Aug;122(8):827-836
pubmed: 29895467
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jul-Aug;17(4):454-61
pubmed: 20595314
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2012 Jul;17:1-40
pubmed: 22826903
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Dec 09;9:49
pubmed: 20003236
PM R. 2017 May;9(5S):S13-S18
pubmed: 28527498