Where is obstetric anesthesiology heading in the next decade? An Eastern European perspective.

European countries of "Eastern Block" origin took different healthcare and economic development trajectories after the Berlin Wall fell. Despite decreased maternal and neonatal mortality in the last two decades, healthcare disparities exist between the various countries. Minimum standards for obstetric anesthesia are not available for every maternity patient. Lack of equity in access to healthcare for maternity patients is multifactorial and includes differences in systems of care and health economics, and shortages of medical personnel. The war in Ukraine generates additional challenges for healthcare systems in the region, resulting from a significant increase in the number of refugees, some of whom are pregnant and require maternity services, including obstetric anesthesia and analgesia and maternal critical care. The next decade's challenges comprise the implementation of evidence-based medicine advances in the field of obstetric anesthesia and analgesia, and of maternal critical care at national levels, including access to neuraxial opioids, the broad implementation of enhanced recovery after cesarean section protocols, and more frequent use of labor epidural analgesia. Further, there needs to be improvement in medical education provided in the national language, so that healthcare providers, patients, and their families can build and provide a safe environment for maternity patients. In addition, better provision of services and access to healthcare providers who have been well trained and are dedicated to dealing with obstetric patients. These measures will hopefully enhance the quality of care for maternity patients, focusing on further reduction of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, which is a priority and a highly desirable long-term outcome.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.