Characteristics of detection accuracy of the patient setup using InBore optical patient positioning system.
Detection accuracy
InBore system
Patient setup
Surface-guided radiation therapy
Journal
Radiological physics and technology
ISSN: 1865-0341
Titre abrégé: Radiol Phys Technol
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101467995
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
16
06
2023
accepted:
08
09
2023
revised:
29
08
2023
medline:
23
11
2023
pubmed:
9
10
2023
entrez:
9
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to evaluate the detection accuracy of the AlignRT-InBore system in surface-guided radiation therapy using a phantom and to determine the feasibility of the system by conducting a comparative analysis with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) registration. The AlignRT-InBore system integrated with the ETHOS Therapy was used. A phantom and a QUASAR phantom were employed to examine the specific areas of interest relevant to clinical cases. The evaluation involved monitoring translations for approximately 30 min and assessing the position detection accuracy for static and moving objects. Fifty clinical cases were used to evaluate the position detection accuracy and its relationship with the localization accuracy of CBCT before treatment. The detection accuracy of static and moving objects was within 1.0 mm using the phantom. However, the longitudinal direction tended to be larger than the other directions. Regarding the accuracy of localization in clinical cases, a strong and statistically significant (p < 0.01) correlation was observed in each direction. A detection accuracy within 1.0 mm is possible for static and moving objects. The detection accuracy of the patient setup using the InBore optical patient positioning system was extremely high, and the patient could be detected with high precision, suggesting its usefulness.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37812309
doi: 10.1007/s12194-023-00741-2
pii: 10.1007/s12194-023-00741-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
532-542Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Japanese Society of Radiological Technology and Japan Society of Medical Physics.
Références
Al-Hallaq HA, Cerviño L, Gutierrez AN, Havnen-Smith A, Higgins SA, Kügele M, et al. AAPM task group report 302: surface guided radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2022;49:e82-112.
doi: 10.1002/mp.15532
pubmed: 35179229
Freislederer P, Kügele M, Öllers M, Swinnen A, Sauer TO, Bert C, et al. Recent advances in surface-guided radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol Radiat Oncol. 2020;15:1–11.
Heinzerling JH, Hampton CJ, Robinson M, Bright M, Moeller BJ, et al. Use of surface-guided radiation therapy in combination with IGRT for setup and intrafraction motion monitoring during stereotactic body radiation therapy treatments of the lung and abdomen. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020;21(5):48–55.
doi: 10.1002/acm2.12852
pubmed: 32196944
pmcid: 7286017
Hamming VC, Visser C, Batin E, McDermott LN, Busz DM, Both S, et al. Evaluation of a 3D surface imaging system for deep inspiration breath-hold patient positioning and intra-fraction monitoring. Radiat Oncol. 2019;14:125.
doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1329-6
pubmed: 31296245
pmcid: 6624957
Wiant D, Liu H, Hayes TL, Shang Q, Mutic S, Sintay B. Direct comparison between surface imaging and orthogonal radiographic imaging for SRS localization in phantom. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20(1):137–44.
doi: 10.1002/acm2.12498
pubmed: 30548795
Cravo Sá A, Fermento A, Neves D, Ferreira S, Silva T, Coelho CM, et al. Radiotherapy setup displacements in breast cancer patients: 3D surface imaging experience. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2018;23(1):61–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2017.12.007
pubmed: 29379398
pmcid: 5773710
Alderliesten T, Sonke JJ, Betgen A, Honnef J, Vroegindeweij V, Remeijer P. Accuracy evaluation of a 3-dimensional surface imaging system for guidance in deep-inspiration breath-hold radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;85:536–542.
Qubala A, Schwahofer A, Jersemann S, Eskandarian S, Harrabi S, Naumann P. Optimizing the patient positioning workflow of patients with pelvis, limb, and chest/spine tumors at an ion-beam gantry based on optical surface guidance. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2023;8(2): 101105.
doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101105
pubmed: 36624871
Stanley DN, McConnell KA, Kirby N, Gutierrez AN, Papanikolaou N, Rasmussen K. Comparison of initial patient setup accuracy between surface imaging and three point localization: a retrospective analysis. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017;18(6):58–61.
doi: 10.1002/acm2.12183
pubmed: 28901684
pmcid: 5689923
Nguyen D, Farah J, Barbet N, Khodri M. Commissioning and performance testing of the first prototype of AlignRT InBore™ a Halcyon™ and Ethos™-dedicated surface guided radiation therapy platform. Physica Med. 2020;80:159–66.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.10.024
Flores-Martinez E, Cerviño L, Pawlicki T, Kim G-Y. Assessment of the use of different imaging and delivery techniques for cranial treatments on the Halcyon™ linac. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020;21(1):53–61.
doi: 10.1002/acm2.12772
pubmed: 31738473
Nguyen D, Khodri M, Sporea C, Reinoso R, Jacob Y, Farah J. Investigating the robustness of the AlignRT InBore™ co-calibration process and determining the overall tracking errors. Physica Med. 2023;108: 102567.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102567
Lorchel F, Nguyen D, Mamou A, Barbet N, Camoesas J, Degluaire Y, et al. Reproducibility of Deep-Inspiration Breath Hold treatments on Halcyon™ performed using the first clinical version of AlignRT InBore™: Results of CYBORE study. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2022;35:90–6.
pubmed: 35662884
pmcid: 9156859
Stanley DN, Harms J, Pogue JA, Belliveau JG, Marcrom SR, McDonald AM, et al. A roadmap for implementation of kV-CBCT online adaptive radiation therapy and initial first year experiences. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023;24: e13961.
doi: 10.1002/acm2.13961
pubmed: 36920871
pmcid: 10338842
Willoughby T, Lehmann J, Bencomo JA, Jani SK, Santanam L, Sethi A, et al. AAPM task group report 147: Quality assurance for nonradiographic radiotherapy localization and positioning systems. Med Phys. 2012;39(4):1728–47.
doi: 10.1118/1.3681967
pubmed: 22482598
Bert C, Metheany KG, Doppke K, George T, Chen Y. A phantom evaluation of a stereo-vision surface imaging system for radiotherapy patient setup. Med Phys. 2005;32:2753–62.
doi: 10.1118/1.1984263
pubmed: 16266088
Walter F, Freislederer P, Belka C, Heinz C, Roeder F. Evaluation of daily patient positioning for radiotherapy with a commercial 3D surface-imaging system (catalyst). Radiat Oncol. 2016;11(1):154.
doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0728-1
pubmed: 27881158
pmcid: 5122202
Carl G, Reitz D, Schonecker S, Pazos M, Freislederer P, Reiner M, et al. Optical surface scanning for patient positioning in radiation therapy: a prospective analysis of 1902 fractions. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2018;17:1533033818806002.
doi: 10.1177/1533033818806002
pubmed: 30453842
pmcid: 6243634
Masahide S, Koji U, Suzuki H, Komiyama T, Kan M, Shinichi A, et al. Evaluation of the detection accuracy of set-up for various treatment sites using surface-guided radiotherapy system, VOXELAN: a phantom study. J Radiat Res. 2022;63(3):435–42.
doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrac015
Covington EL, Stanley DN, Sullivan RJ, Riley KO, Fiveash JB, Popple RA. Commissioning and clinical evaluation of the IDENTIFYTM surface imaging system for frameless stereotactic radiosurgery. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023; 1:e14058.
Barfield G, Burton EW, Stoddart J, Metwaly M, Cawley MG. Quality assurance of gating response times for surface guided motion management treatment delivery using an electronic portal imaging detector. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64: 125023.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab205a
pubmed: 31071694