Rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative rods directly from positive blood cultures using the novel Q-linea ASTar system.
AST
RAST
VITEK
blood stream infection
scum plate method
sepsis
Journal
Journal of clinical microbiology
ISSN: 1098-660X
Titre abrégé: J Clin Microbiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505564
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Nov 2023
21 Nov 2023
Historique:
medline:
22
11
2023
pubmed:
11
10
2023
entrez:
11
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Adequate and timely antibiotic therapy is crucial for the treatment of sepsis. Innovative systems, like the Q-linea ASTar, have been developed to perform rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) directly from positive blood cultures (BCs). We conducted a prospective study to evaluate ASTar under real-life conditions with a focus on time-to-result and impact on antimicrobial therapy. Over 2 months, all positive BCs that showed Gram-negative rods upon microscopy were tested with the ASTar and our standard procedure (VITEK 2 from short-term culture). Additionally, we included multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria from our archive. Both methods were compared to broth microdilution. In total, 78 bacterial strains (51 prospective and 27 archived) were tested. ASTar covered 94% of the species encountered. The categorical and essential agreement was 95.6% and 90.7%, respectively. ASTar caused 2.4% minor, 2.0% major, and 2.4% very major errors. The categorical agreement was similar to standard procedure. The average time between BC sampling and the availability of the antibiogram for the attending physician was 28 h 49 min for ASTar and 44 h 18 min for standard procedure. ASTar correctly identified all patients who required an escalation of antimicrobial therapy and 75% of those who were eligible for de-escalation. In conclusion, ASTar provided reliable AST results and significantly shortened the time to obtain an antibiogram. However, the percentage of patients that will profit from ASTar in a low-resistance setting is limited, and it is currently unclear if a change of therapy 29 h after BC sampling will have a significant impact on the patient's prognosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37819072
doi: 10.1128/jcm.00549-23
pmc: PMC10662367
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0054923Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Nov 1;75(11):3230-3238
pubmed: 32789506
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 8;76(3):469-478
pubmed: 36065752
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Jul 15;10:308
pubmed: 32760676
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Mar 26;56(4):
pubmed: 29367292
J Clin Microbiol. 2023 Mar 23;61(3):e0152522
pubmed: 36852983
Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):1589-96
pubmed: 16625125
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Oct;60(4):855-63
pubmed: 17644532
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Dec 1;49(11):1749-55
pubmed: 19857164
Chest. 2009 Nov;136(5):1237-1248
pubmed: 19696123
Hosp Pediatr. 2021 Sep;11(9):953-961
pubmed: 34407980
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Oct;54(10):4085-91
pubmed: 20660675
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Apr 27;10(2):e0210721
pubmed: 35234503
J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Jun 15;60(6):e0009822
pubmed: 35607972
Pathogens. 2022 Nov 24;11(12):
pubmed: 36558749