Preparation/administration of push-dose versus continuous infusion epinephrine and phenylephrine: A simulation.

Continuous infusion vasopressors Epinephrine Medication safety Pharmacist Phenylephrine Push dose vasopressors

Journal

The American journal of emergency medicine
ISSN: 1532-8171
Titre abrégé: Am J Emerg Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309942

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2023
Historique:
received: 30 06 2023
revised: 18 09 2023
accepted: 01 10 2023
medline: 27 11 2023
pubmed: 14 10 2023
entrez: 13 10 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Hypotension is a common problem in the emergency department (ED) and intensive care unit (ICU) and can increase risk for poor outcomes. Many EDs/ICUs utilize epinephrine and phenylephrine to treat hypotension and these medications are most often administered as a continuous infusion (CI). Push-dose (PD) is the administration of small medication doses as intermittent intravenous pushes (IVPs). There is limited information comparing the time required to prepare and administer PD versus CI and errors have been reported when preparing and administering these medications at bedside. This simulation study sought to estimate preparation and administration times and preparation and errors with PD and CI epinephrine and phenylephrine when prepared by an ED/ICU pharmacist. This crossover simulation study took place in a simulation center at an academic medical center and utilized a multi-venous intravenous training arm kit equip with an 18-gauge intravenous line, an extension tubing set, and a luer-lock adapter. The primary outcome was total preparation and administration time in seconds. The secondary outcome was major preparation and administration errors, defined as errors causing a five-fold or greater overdose. In total, 16 pharmacists participated, including nine ED and seven ICU pharmacists. PD had faster total preparation and administration time and administration time, but not preparation time; PD showed an approximate 70 s decrease in total preparation and administration time versus CI. PD had more major preparation and administration errors and six PD preparations (18.8%, 6/32) had at least one major preparation and administration error. CI, on the other hand, had no major preparation and administration errors. This simulation found faster total preparation and administration time with PD versus CI epinephrine and phenylephrine, but also found that PD had more major preparation and administration errors. Dilutional errors during medication preparation were the cause of 83.3% (5/6) of our overdoses. This simulation study showed that ED/ICU pharmacists had faster median total preparation and administration times for PD epinephrine and phenylephrine versus CI, but PD also had more preparation and administration errors.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Hypotension is a common problem in the emergency department (ED) and intensive care unit (ICU) and can increase risk for poor outcomes. Many EDs/ICUs utilize epinephrine and phenylephrine to treat hypotension and these medications are most often administered as a continuous infusion (CI). Push-dose (PD) is the administration of small medication doses as intermittent intravenous pushes (IVPs). There is limited information comparing the time required to prepare and administer PD versus CI and errors have been reported when preparing and administering these medications at bedside. This simulation study sought to estimate preparation and administration times and preparation and errors with PD and CI epinephrine and phenylephrine when prepared by an ED/ICU pharmacist.
METHODS
This crossover simulation study took place in a simulation center at an academic medical center and utilized a multi-venous intravenous training arm kit equip with an 18-gauge intravenous line, an extension tubing set, and a luer-lock adapter. The primary outcome was total preparation and administration time in seconds. The secondary outcome was major preparation and administration errors, defined as errors causing a five-fold or greater overdose.
RESULTS
In total, 16 pharmacists participated, including nine ED and seven ICU pharmacists. PD had faster total preparation and administration time and administration time, but not preparation time; PD showed an approximate 70 s decrease in total preparation and administration time versus CI. PD had more major preparation and administration errors and six PD preparations (18.8%, 6/32) had at least one major preparation and administration error. CI, on the other hand, had no major preparation and administration errors.
DISCUSSION
This simulation found faster total preparation and administration time with PD versus CI epinephrine and phenylephrine, but also found that PD had more major preparation and administration errors. Dilutional errors during medication preparation were the cause of 83.3% (5/6) of our overdoses.
CONCLUSION
This simulation study showed that ED/ICU pharmacists had faster median total preparation and administration times for PD epinephrine and phenylephrine versus CI, but PD also had more preparation and administration errors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37832396
pii: S0735-6757(23)00541-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.10.002
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Phenylephrine 1WS297W6MV
Epinephrine YKH834O4BH

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

135-139

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Auteurs

Hannah Morley (H)

SUNY Upstate University Hospital, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States of America.

Robert Seabury (R)

SUNY Upstate University Hospital, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States of America; SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States of America.

Katie Parsels (K)

SUNY Upstate University Hospital, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States of America. Electronic address: parselsk@upstate.edu.

Christopher Miller (C)

SUNY Upstate University Hospital, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States of America; SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States of America.

William Darko (W)

SUNY Upstate University Hospital, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States of America; SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States of America.

Joshua Schrader (J)

SUNY Upstate University Hospital, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States of America.

Gregory Meola (G)

SUNY Upstate University Hospital, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States of America; SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States of America.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH