Initial experience with the graphical user interface for laser parameters setting of a new thulium fibre laser source device for urinary pathologies treatment.
Graphical user interface
Pre-setting
RIRS
Thulium fibre laser
Urolithiasis
Journal
World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
02
05
2023
accepted:
15
09
2023
medline:
4
12
2023
pubmed:
14
10
2023
entrez:
13
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We aimed to evaluate the concordance between the pre-settings ranges of thulium fibre laser (TFL) (Coloplast TFL Drive, Denmark) with easy-to-use graphical user interface and the laser settings used by a high-volume endo-urologist during surgical procedures. In October 2022, we prospectively collected data of 67 patients who underwent TFL Drive (Coloplast, Denmark) for the management of urinary stones. Urothelial tumour (upper tract urinary cancer (UTUC) and bladder) 200 and 150 μm laser fibres were used for procedures. Stones characteristics (size and density) tumours and stenosis localizations, laser-on time (LOT), and laser settings were recorded. We also assessed the ablation speed (mm A total 67 patients took part in the study. Median age was 52 (15-81) years. 55 (82%), 8 (12%), and 4 (6%) patients presented urinary stones, urothelial tumour, and stenosis, respectively. Median stone volume was 438 (36-6027) mm During endoscopic procedures for urinary stones treatment, it is frequently needed to change laser parameters. These new TFL and GUI technology parameters remained in the pre-set security range in 94.1% of procedures.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to evaluate the concordance between the pre-settings ranges of thulium fibre laser (TFL) (Coloplast TFL Drive, Denmark) with easy-to-use graphical user interface and the laser settings used by a high-volume endo-urologist during surgical procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
In October 2022, we prospectively collected data of 67 patients who underwent TFL Drive (Coloplast, Denmark) for the management of urinary stones. Urothelial tumour (upper tract urinary cancer (UTUC) and bladder) 200 and 150 μm laser fibres were used for procedures. Stones characteristics (size and density) tumours and stenosis localizations, laser-on time (LOT), and laser settings were recorded. We also assessed the ablation speed (mm
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total 67 patients took part in the study. Median age was 52 (15-81) years. 55 (82%), 8 (12%), and 4 (6%) patients presented urinary stones, urothelial tumour, and stenosis, respectively. Median stone volume was 438 (36-6027) mm
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
During endoscopic procedures for urinary stones treatment, it is frequently needed to change laser parameters. These new TFL and GUI technology parameters remained in the pre-set security range in 94.1% of procedures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37833547
doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04631-5
pii: 10.1007/s00345-023-04631-5
doi:
Substances chimiques
Thulium
8RKC5ATI4P
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3765-3771Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Alken P, Hutschenreiter G, Günther R, Marberger M (1981) Percutaneous stone manipulation. J Urol 125(4):463–466
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)55073-9
pubmed: 7218439
Fernström I, Johansson B (1976) Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 10(3):257–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.1976.11882084
doi: 10.1080/21681805.1976.11882084
pubmed: 1006190
Chaussy C, Schmiedt E, Jocham B, Brendel W, Forssmann B, Walther V (1982) First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. J Urol 127(3):417–420
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)53841-0
pubmed: 6977650
Grasso M, Bagley D (1994) A 7.5/8.2 F actively deflectable, flexible ureteroscope: a new device for both diagnostic and therapeutic upper urinary tract endoscopy. Urology 43(4):435–441
doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(94)90226-7
pubmed: 8154064
Taratkin M, Laukhtina E, Singla N, Tarasov A, Alekseeva T, Enikeev M et al (2021) How lasers ablate stones: in vitro study of laser lithotripsy (Ho:YAG and Tm-fiber lasers) in different environments. J Endourol 35(6):931–936. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0441
doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0441
pubmed: 31885281
Scott NJ, Cilip CM, Fried NM (2009) Thulium fiber laser ablation of urinary stones through small-core optical fibers. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 15(2):435–440
doi: 10.1109/JSTQE.2008.2012133
Fried NM, Irby PB (2018) Advances in laser technology and fibre-optic delivery systems in lithotripsy. Nat Rev Urol 15(9):563–573
doi: 10.1038/s41585-018-0035-8
pubmed: 29884804
Sierra A, Corrales M, Piñero A, Traxer O (2022) Thulium fiber laser pre-settings during ureterorenoscopy: Twitter’s experts’ recommendations. World J Urol [Internet] 40(6):1529–1535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-03966-9
doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-03966-9
pubmed: 35246704
Sierra A, Corrales M, Piñero A, Kolvatzis M, Somani B, Traxer O (2022) Glossary of pre-settings given by laser companies: no consensus! World J Urol 40(9):2313–2321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04090-4
doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04090-4
pubmed: 35933626
Weiss B, Shah O (2016) Evaluation of dusting versus basketing—can new technologies improve stone-free rates? Nat Rev Urol 13(12):726–733
doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.172
pubmed: 27698400
Doizi S, Keller EX, De Coninck V, Traxer O (2018) Dusting technique for lithotripsy: what does it mean? Nat Rev Urol 15(11):653–654
doi: 10.1038/s41585-018-0042-9
pubmed: 29921906
Keller EX, De Coninck V, Doizi S, Daudon M, Traxer O (2021) What is the exact definition of stone dust? An in vitro evaluation. World J Urol 39(1):187–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03178-z
doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03178-z
pubmed: 32270283
Kronenberg P, Somani B (2018) Advances in lasers for the treatment of stones—a systematic review. Curr Urol Rep 19(6):45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-018-0807-y
doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0807-y
pubmed: 29774438
pmcid: 5958148
Traxer O, Corrales M (2022) New lasers for stone treatment. Urol Clin North Am 49(1):1–10
doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2021.07.006
pubmed: 34776044
Kronenberg P, Traxer O (2019) The laser of the future: reality and expectations about the new thulium fiber laser—a systematic review. Transl Androl Urol. 8(Suppl 4):S398–S417
doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.08.01
pubmed: 31656746
pmcid: 6790412
Jones P, Beisland C, Ulvik Ø (2021) Current status of thulium fibre laser lithotripsy: an up-to-date review. BJU Int 128(5):531–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15551
doi: 10.1111/bju.15551
pubmed: 34273234
Corrales M, Traxer O (2021) Initial clinical experience with the new thulium fiber laser: first 50 cases. World J Urol 39(10):3945–3950
doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03616-6
pubmed: 33590280
Roth CJ, Boll DT, Chea YW, Wall LK, Merkle EM (2009) Implementation of graphic user interface screen capture solution for workflow assessment of abdominal MR examinations valuable tool to analyze discrepancies in expected and experienced MR table time. Acad Radiol 16(10):1286–1291
doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.05.009
pubmed: 19596590
Bonekamp S, Ghosh P, Crawford S, Solga S, Horska A, Brancati F et al (2008) Quantitative comparison and evaluation of software packages for assessment of abdominal adipose tissue distribution by magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Obes 32(1):100–111
doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803696
Owrangi AM, Entwistle B, Lu A, Chiu J, Hussain N, Etemad-Rezai R et al (2013) Semi-automated scoring of pulmonary emphysema from X-ray CT: trainee reproducibility and accuracy. Eur J Radiol 82(11):e734-741
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.07.013
pubmed: 23957938
Sierra A, Corrales M, Kolvatzis M, Traxer O (2022) Initial clinical experience with the thulium fiber laser from quanta system: first 50 reported cases. World J Urol 40(10):2549–2553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04096-y
doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04096-y
pubmed: 35861860
Ulvik Ø, Æsøy MS, Juliebø-Jones P, Gjengstø P, Beisland C (2022) Thulium fibre laser versus holmium:YAG for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: outcomes from a prospective randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol 82(1):73–79
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.027
pubmed: 35300888
Winship B, Wollin D, Carlos E, Peters C, Li J, Terry R et al (2019) The rise and fall of high temperatures during ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy. J Endourol 33(10):794–799. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0084
doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0084
pubmed: 31016991
Liang H, Liang L, Yu Y, Huang B, Chen J, Wang C et al (2020) Thermal effect of holmium laser during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. BMC Urol 20(1):69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-00639-w
doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00639-w
pubmed: 32539828
pmcid: 7296665
Ventimiglia E, Pauchard F, Gorgen ARH, Panthier F, Doizi S, Traxer O (2021) How do we assess the efficacy of Ho:YAG low-power laser lithotripsy for the treatment of upper tract urinary stones? Introducing the Joules/mm3 and laser activity concepts. World J Urol marzo de 39(3):891–896
doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03241-9