Sign Language Recognition Using the Electromyographic Signal: A Systematic Literature Review.


Journal

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8220
Titre abrégé: Sensors (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101204366

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 30 06 2023
revised: 23 09 2023
accepted: 03 10 2023
medline: 23 10 2023
pubmed: 14 10 2023
entrez: 14 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The analysis and recognition of sign languages are currently active fields of research focused on sign recognition. Various approaches differ in terms of analysis methods and the devices used for sign acquisition. Traditional methods rely on video analysis or spatial positioning data calculated using motion capture tools. In contrast to these conventional recognition and classification approaches, electromyogram (EMG) signals, which measure muscle electrical activity, offer potential technology for detecting gestures. These EMG-based approaches have recently gained attention due to their advantages. This prompted us to conduct a comprehensive study on the methods, approaches, and projects utilizing EMG sensors for sign language handshape recognition. In this paper, we provided an overview of the sign language recognition field through a literature review, with the objective of offering an in-depth review of the most significant techniques. These techniques were categorized in this article based on their respective methodologies. The survey discussed the progress and challenges in sign language recognition systems based on surface electromyography (sEMG) signals. These systems have shown promise but face issues like sEMG data variability and sensor placement. Multiple sensors enhance reliability and accuracy. Machine learning, including deep learning, is used to address these challenges. Common classifiers in sEMG-based sign language recognition include SVM, ANN, CNN, KNN, HMM, and LSTM. While SVM and ANN are widely used, random forest and KNN have shown better performance in some cases. A multilayer perceptron neural network achieved perfect accuracy in one study. CNN, often paired with LSTM, ranks as the third most popular classifier and can achieve exceptional accuracy, reaching up to 99.6% when utilizing both EMG and IMU data. LSTM is highly regarded for handling sequential dependencies in EMG signals, making it a critical component of sign language recognition systems. In summary, the survey highlights the prevalence of SVM and ANN classifiers but also suggests the effectiveness of alternative classifiers like random forests and KNNs. LSTM emerges as the most suitable algorithm for capturing sequential dependencies and improving gesture recognition in EMG-based sign language recognition systems.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37837173
pii: s23198343
doi: 10.3390/s23198343
pmc: PMC10574929
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Systematic Review Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Références

Micromachines (Basel). 2022 Nov 29;13(12):
pubmed: 36557408
Comput Biol Med. 2014 Aug;51:1-13
pubmed: 24857941
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:5182-5
pubmed: 18003175
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Oct 14;20(20):
pubmed: 33066452
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Aug 05;20(16):
pubmed: 32764286
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2017 Jul;21(4):994-1004
pubmed: 27164613
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020 May;24(5):1310-1320
pubmed: 31536027
IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2012;5:3-14
pubmed: 23231985
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2016 Sep;20(5):1281-1290
pubmed: 27576269
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Sep 15;15(9):23303-24
pubmed: 26389907
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:3358-61
pubmed: 22255059
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun 24;20(12):
pubmed: 32599793
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;2006:6197-200
pubmed: 17946747
Prog Neurobiol. 2009 Jun;88(2):114-26
pubmed: 19482228
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012 Oct;59(10):2695-704
pubmed: 22438511
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Jan 14;16(1):
pubmed: 26784195
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2010 Mar;48(3):255-67
pubmed: 19943194
Data Brief. 2020 Oct 22;33:106455
pubmed: 33195774
Sensors (Basel). 2019 May 31;19(11):
pubmed: 31159240
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Mar;130:104188
pubmed: 33421824
J Med Eng Technol. 2016;40(4):149-54
pubmed: 27004618
Technol Health Care. 2018;26(S1):249-258
pubmed: 29710753

Auteurs

Amina Ben Haj Amor (A)

Research Laboratory LaTICE, University of Tunis, Tunis 1008, Tunisia.

Oussama El Ghoul (O)

Mada-Assistive Technology Center Qatar, Doha P.O. Box 24230, Qatar.

Mohamed Jemni (M)

Arab League Educational, Cultural, and Scientific Organization, Tunis 1003, Tunisia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH