Adapting crop production to climate change and air pollution at different scales.
Journal
Nature food
ISSN: 2662-1355
Titre abrégé: Nat Food
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101761102
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
16
12
2022
accepted:
12
09
2023
medline:
31
10
2023
pubmed:
17
10
2023
entrez:
16
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Air pollution and climate change are tightly interconnected and jointly affect field crop production and agroecosystem health. Although our understanding of the individual and combined impacts of air pollution and climate change factors is improving, the adaptation of crop production to concurrent air pollution and climate change remains challenging to resolve. Here we evaluate recent advances in the adaptation of crop production to climate change and air pollution at the plant, field and ecosystem scales. The main approaches at the plant level include the integration of genetic variation, molecular breeding and phenotyping. Field-level techniques include optimizing cultivation practices, promoting mixed cropping and diversification, and applying technologies such as antiozonants, nanotechnology and robot-assisted farming. Plant- and field-level techniques would be further facilitated by enhancing soil resilience, incorporating precision agriculture and modifying the hydrology and microclimate of agricultural landscapes at the ecosystem level. Strategies and opportunities for crop production under climate change and air pollution are discussed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37845546
doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00858-y
pii: 10.1038/s43016-023-00858-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
854-865Subventions
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)
ID : 42130714, 42207123, 42107270
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)
ID : 4210070867
Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Khush, G. S. Green revolution: the way forward. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 815–822 (2001).
pubmed: 11584298
doi: 10.1038/35093585
Brisson, N. et al. Why are wheat yields stagnating in Europe? A comprehensive data analysis for France. Field Crops Res. 119, 201–212 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.07.012
World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision (Department of Economic & Social Affairs, United Nations, 2017).
IPCC Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (UN General Assembly, 2015); https://www.refworld.org/docid/57b6e3e44.html
Wang, F. et al. Climate change: strategies for mitigation and adaptation. Innov. Geosci. 1, 100015 (2023).
doi: 10.59717/j.xinn-geo.2023.100015
Fuhrer, J. Agroecosystem responses to combinations of elevated CO
doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00125-7
Otu-Larbi, F., Conte, A., Fares, S., Wild, O. & Ashworth, K. Current and future impacts of drought and ozone stress on Northern Hemisphere forests. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 6218–6234 (2020).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.15339
Smith, M. R. & Myers, S. S. Global health implications of nutrient changes in rice under high atmospheric carbon dioxide. GeoHealth. 3, 190–200 (2019).
pubmed: 32159041
pmcid: 7007128
doi: 10.1029/2019GH000188
Loladze, I. Hidden shift of the ionome of plants exposed to elevated CO
Chavan, S. G., Duursma, R. A., Tausz, M. & Ghannoum, O. Elevated CO
pubmed: 31504692
pmcid: 6859723
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz386
Singh, A. A., Ghosh, A., Pandey, B., Agrawal, M. & Agrawal, S. B. Unravelling the ozone toxicity in Zea mays L. (C
Poorter, H. et al. A meta-analysis of responses of C
pubmed: 34657301
doi: 10.1111/nph.17802
Samaniego, L. et al. Anthropogenic warming exacerbates European soil moisture droughts. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 421–426 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41558-018-0138-5
Zhou, D. et al. Croplands intensify regional and global warming according to satellite observations. Remote Sens. Environ. 264, 112585 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112585
Lin, M. et al. Vegetation feedbacks during drought exacerbate ozone air pollution extremes in Europe. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 444–451 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41558-020-0743-y
Frei, M. Breeding of ozone resistant rice: relevance, approaches and challenges. Environ. Pollut. 197, 144–155 (2015).
pubmed: 25528448
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.12.011
Mills, G. et al. Closing the global ozone yield gap: quantification and cobenefits for multistress tolerance. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 4869–4893 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.14381
Collard, B. C. Y. & Mackill, D. J. Marker-assisted selection: an approach for precision plant breeding in the twenty-first century. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 363, 557–572 (2007).
pmcid: 2610170
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2170
Wang, W. et al. Genomic variation in 3,010 diverse accessions of Asian cultivated rice. Nature 557, 43–49 (2018).
pubmed: 29695866
pmcid: 6784863
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0063-9
Tester, M. & Langridge, P. Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 327, 818–822 (2010).
pubmed: 20150489
doi: 10.1126/science.1183700
Ye, C. et al. in Rice Improvement (eds Ali, J. & Wani, S. H.) 203–220 (Springer, 2021).
Frei, M., Tanaka, J. P. & Wissuwa, M. Genotypic variation in tolerance to elevated ozone in rice: dissection of distinct genetic factors linked to tolerance mechanisms. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 3741–3752 (2008).
pubmed: 18776183
doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern222
Sorgini, C. A., Barrios-Perez, I., Brown, P. J. & Ainsworth, E. A. Examining genetic variation in maize inbreds and mapping oxidative stress response QTL in B73-Mo17 nearly isogenic lines. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 3, 51 (2019).
doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2019.00051
Begum, H. et al. Genetic dissection of bread wheat diversity and identification of adaptive loci in response to elevated tropospheric ozone. Plant. Cell Environ. 43, 2650–2665 (2020).
pubmed: 32744331
doi: 10.1111/pce.13864
Waldeck, N. et al. RNA-Seq study reveals genetic responses of diverse wild soybean accessions to increased ozone levels. BMC Genom. 18, 498 (2017).
doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3876-2
Yendrek, C. R., Koester, R. P. & Ainsworth, E. A. A comparative analysis of transcriptomic, biochemical, and physiological responses to elevated ozone identifies species-specific mechanisms of resilience in legume crops. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 7101–7112 (2015).
pubmed: 26324463
pmcid: 4765784
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv404
Tausz, M. et al. Understanding crop physiology to select breeding targets and improve crop management under increasing atmospheric CO
doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.12.005
Dai, L. P. et al. Mapping of QTLs for source and sink associated traits under elevated CO
doi: 10.1007/s10725-019-00564-5
Nakano, H. et al. Quantitative trait loci for large sink capacity enhance rice grain yield under free-air CO
pubmed: 28500344
pmcid: 5431863
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01690-8
Fan, G. et al. Analysis of QTLs for flag leaf shape and its response to elevated CO
doi: 10.1016/S1672-6308(07)60002-X
Palit, P. et al. An integrated research framework combining genomics, systems biology, physiology, modelling and breeding for legume improvement in response to elevated CO
pubmed: 32494569
pmcid: 7233140
doi: 10.1016/j.cpb.2020.100149
Ainsworth, E. A. & Long, S. P. 30 years of free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE): what have we learned about future crop productivity and its potential for adaptation? Glob. Change Biol. 27, 27–49 (2021).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.15375
Flexas, J. et al. Decreased Rubisco activity during water stress is not induced by decreased relative water content but related to conditions of low stomatal conductance and chloroplast CO
pubmed: 16945090
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01794.x
Flexas, J., Ribas-Carbó, M., Diaz-Espejo, A., Galmés, J. & Medrano, H. Mesophyll conductance to CO
pubmed: 17996013
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01757.x
Paoletti, E. Impact of ozone on Mediterranean forests: a review. Environ. Pollut. 144, 463–474 (2006).
pubmed: 16551488
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.12.051
Medlyn, B. E. et al. Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 2134–2144 (2011).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02375.x
Papanatsiou, M. et al. Optogenetic manipulation of stomatal kinetics improves carbon assimilation, water use, and growth. Science 363, 1456–1459 (2019).
pubmed: 30923223
doi: 10.1126/science.aaw0046
Qu, M. et al. Alterations in stomatal response to fluctuating light increase biomass and yield of rice under drought conditions. Plant J. 104, 1334–1347 (2020).
pubmed: 33015858
doi: 10.1111/tpj.15004
Hoshika, Y., Watanabe, M., Inada, N. & Koike, T. Model-based analysis of avoidance of ozone stress by stomatal closure in Siebold’s beech (Fagus crenata). Ann. Bot. 112, 1149–1158 (2013).
pubmed: 23904447
pmcid: 3783231
doi: 10.1093/aob/mct166
Feng, Z. et al. Apoplastic ascorbate contributes to the differential ozone sensitivity in two varieties of winter wheat under fully open-air field conditions. Environ. Pollut. 158, 3539–3545 (2010).
pubmed: 20855141
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.08.019
Choquette, N. E., Ainsworth, E. A., Bezodis, W. & Cavanagh, A. P. Ozone tolerant maize hybrids maintain Rubisco content and activity during long‐term exposure in the field. Plant. Cell Environ. 43, 3033 (2020).
pubmed: 32844407
pmcid: 7756399
doi: 10.1111/pce.13876
Ainsworth, E. A. Understanding and improving global crop response to ozone pollution. Plant J. 90, 886–897 (2017).
pubmed: 27739639
doi: 10.1111/tpj.13298
Dai, L., Kobayashi, K., Nouchi, I., Masutomi, Y. & Feng, Z. Quantifying determinants of ozone detoxification by apoplastic ascorbate in peach (Prunus persica) leaves using a model of ozone transport and reaction. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 3147–3162 (2020).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.15049
Mashaheet, A. M. et al. Differential ozone responses identified among key rust-susceptible wheat genotypes. Agronomy 10, 1853 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/agronomy10121853
Agathokleous, E. et al. Ethylenediurea protects against ozone phytotoxicity not by adding nitrogen or controlling stomata in a stomata-unresponsive hybrid poplar. Sci. Total Environ. 875, 162672 (2023).
pubmed: 36894106
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162672
Driedonks, N., Rieu, I. & Vriezen, W. H. Breeding for plant heat tolerance at vegetative and reproductive stages. Plant Reprod. 29, 67–79 (2016).
pubmed: 26874710
pmcid: 4909801
doi: 10.1007/s00497-016-0275-9
Lei, D., Tan, L., Liu, F., Chen, L. & Sun, C. Identification of heat-sensitive QTL derived from common wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.). Plant Sci. 201–202, 121–127 (2013).
pubmed: 23352410
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.12.001
Kilasi, N. L. et al. Heat stress tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.): identification of quantitative trait loci and candidate genes for seedling growth under heat stress. Front. Plant Sci. 871, 1578 (2018).
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01578
Chang-lan, Z. et al. QTL for heat-tolerance at grain filling stage in rice. Rice Sci. 12, 33–38 (2005).
Lafarge, T. et al. Genome-wide association analysis for heat tolerance at flowering detected a large set of genes involved in adaptation to thermal and other stresses. PLoS ONE 12, e0171254 (2017).
pubmed: 28152098
pmcid: 5289576
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171254
Ps, S. et al. High-resolution mapping of QTLs for heat tolerance in rice using a 5K SNP array. Rice 10, 28 (2017).
pubmed: 28584974
pmcid: 5459777
doi: 10.1186/s12284-017-0167-0
Malumpong, C. et al. Backcross breeding for improvement of heat tolerance at reproductive phase in Thai rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties. J. Agric. Sci. 158, 496–510 (2020).
doi: 10.1017/S0021859620000957
Chen, L. et al. QTL mapping and identification of candidate genes for heat tolerance at the flowering stage in rice. Front. Genet. 11, 1840 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.621871
Raza, Q., Riaz, A., Bashir, K. & Sabar, M. Reproductive tissues-specific meta-QTLs and candidate genes for development of heat-tolerant rice cultivars. Plant Mol. Biol. 104, 97–112 (2020).
pubmed: 32643113
doi: 10.1007/s11103-020-01027-6
Li, L. et al. Genetic dissection of drought and heat-responsive agronomic traits in wheat. Plant. Cell Environ. 42, 2540–2553 (2019).
pubmed: 31077401
pmcid: 6851630
doi: 10.1111/pce.13577
Abou-Elwafa, S. F. & Shehzad, T. Genetic diversity, GWAS and prediction for drought and terminal heat stress tolerance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 68, 711–728 (2020).
doi: 10.1007/s10722-020-01018-y
Muhu-Din Ahmed, H. G. et al. Genome-wide association mapping for high temperature tolerance in wheat through 90k SNP array using physiological and yield traits. PLoS ONE 17, e0262569 (2022).
pubmed: 35030233
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262569
Van Inghelandt, D., Frey, F. P., Ries, D. & Stich, B. QTL mapping and genome-wide prediction of heat tolerance in multiple connected populations of temperate maize. Sci. Rep. 9, 14418 (2019).
pubmed: 31594984
pmcid: 6783442
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50853-2
Longmei, N. et al. Genome wide association mapping for heat tolerance in sub-tropical maize. BMC Genom. 22, 154 (2021).
doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07463-y
Seetharam, K. et al. Genomic regions associated with heat stress tolerance in tropical maize (Zea mays L.). Sci. Rep. 11, 13730 (2021).
pubmed: 34215789
pmcid: 8253795
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93061-7
Bazzer, S. K. & Purcell, L. C. Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with canopy temperature in soybean. Sci. Rep. 10, 17604 (2020).
pubmed: 33077811
pmcid: 7572360
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74614-8
Kumar, J., Sen Gupta, D. & Djalovic, I. Breeding, genetics, and genomics for tolerance against terminal heat in lentil: current status and future directions. Legum. Sci. 2, e38 (2020).
doi: 10.1002/leg3.38
Masutomi, Y. et al. Breeding targets for heat-tolerant rice varieties in Japan in a warming climate. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 28, 2 (2023).
doi: 10.1007/s11027-022-10027-4
Reynolds, M. & Langridge, P. Physiological breeding. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 31, 162–171 (2016).
pubmed: 27161822
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2016.04.005
Ashikari, M. & Matsuoka, M. Identification, isolation and pyramiding of quantitative trait loci for rice breeding. Trends Plant Sci. 11, 344–350 (2006).
pubmed: 16769240
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.05.008
Wang, Y. et al. Pyramiding of ozone tolerance QTLs OzT8 and OzT9 confers improved tolerance to season-long ozone exposure in rice. Environ. Exp. Bot. 104, 26–33 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.03.005
Bailey-Serres, J., Parker, J. E., Ainsworth, E. A., Oldroyd, G. E. D. & Schroeder, J. I. Genetic strategies for improving crop yields. Nature 575, 109–118 (2019).
pubmed: 31695205
pmcid: 7024682
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1679-0
Feng, Z., Pang, J., Kobayashi, K., Zhu, J. & Ort, D. R. Differential responses in two varieties of winter wheat to elevated ozone concentration under fully open-air field conditions. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 580–591 (2011).
Wei, C. et al. Effects of irrigation methods and salinity on CO
pubmed: 32890824
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141639
Mao, B. et al. Response of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus concentration and stoichiometry of plants and soils during a soybean growth season to O
pubmed: 35122851
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153573
Gou, Z., Yin, W. & Chai, Q. Straw and residual film management enhances crop yield and weakens CO
pubmed: 34234230
pmcid: 8263780
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93497-x
Fares, A. et al. Carbon dioxide emission in relation with irrigation and organic amendments from a sweet corn field. J. Environ. Sci. Health. B 52, 387–394 (2017).
pubmed: 28277076
doi: 10.1080/03601234.2017.1292094
Xu, Z. et al. Effects of elevated CO
pubmed: 24463932
doi: 10.1007/s00425-013-1987-9
Changey, F., Bagard, M., Souleymane, M. & Lerch, T. Z. Cascading effects of elevated ozone on wheat rhizosphere microbial communities depend on temperature and cultivar sensitivity. Environ. Pollut. 242, 113–125 (2018).
pubmed: 29966835
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.073
Kou, T. J. et al. Differential root responses in two cultivars of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to elevated ozone concentration under fully open-air field conditions. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 204, 325–332 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/jac.12257
Broberg, M. C., Daun, S. & Pleijel, H. Ozone induced loss of seed protein accumulation is larger in soybean than in wheat and rice. Agronomy 10, 357 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/agronomy10030357
Feng, Z., Shang, B., Li, Z., Calatayud, V. & Agathokleous, E. Ozone will remain a threat for plants independently of nitrogen load. Funct. Ecol. 33, 1854–1870 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.13422
Broberg, M. C., Uddling, J., Mills, G. & Pleijel, H. Fertilizer efficiency in wheat is reduced by ozone pollution. Sci. Total Environ. 607–608, 876–880 (2017).
pubmed: 28711849
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.069
Peng, J., Xu, Y., Shang, B., Qu, L. & Feng, Z. Impact of ozone pollution on nitrogen fertilization management during maize (Zea mays L.) production. Environ. Pollut. 266, 115158 (2020).
pubmed: 32650199
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115158
Kimball, B. A. et al. Elevated CO
doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00107.x
Liu, B., Wang, X., Ma, L., Chadwick, D. & Chen, X. Combined applications of organic and synthetic nitrogen fertilizers for improving crop yield and reducing reactive nitrogen losses from China’s vegetable systems: a meta-analysis. Environ. Pollut. 269, 116143 (2021).
pubmed: 33310496
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116143
Helman, D. & Bonfil, D. J. Six decades of warming and drought in the world’s top wheat-producing countries offset the benefits of rising CO
pubmed: 35562577
pmcid: 9106749
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11423-1
Mayer, A., Hausfather, Z., Jones, A. D. & Silver, W. L. The potential of agricultural land management to contribute to lower global surface temperatures. Sci. Adv. 4, eaaq0932 (2018).
pubmed: 30167456
pmcid: 6114992
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaq0932
Zhu, P. et al. Warming reduces global agricultural production by decreasing cropping frequency and yields. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 1016–1023 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s41558-022-01492-5
Yang, T., Siddique, K. H. M. & Liu, K. Cropping systems in agriculture and their impact on soil health-A review. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 23, e01118 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01118
Bettles, J. et al. Agroforestry and non-state actors: a review. For. Policy Econ. 130, 102538 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102538
Telwala, Y. Unlocking the potential of agroforestry as a nature-based solution for localizing sustainable development goals: a case study from a drought-prone region in rural India. Nat. Based Solut. 3, 100045 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.nbsj.2022.100045
Apuri, I., Peprah, K. & Achana, G. T. W. Climate change adaptation through agroforestry: the case of Kassena Nankana West District, Ghana. Environ. Dev. 28, 32–41 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.envdev.2018.09.002
Xie, W. et al. Crop switching can enhance environmental sustainability and farmer incomes in China. Nature 616, 300–305 (2023).
pubmed: 36927804
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05799-x
Chen, X. et al. Tree diversity increases decadal forest soil carbon and nitrogen accrual. Nature 618, 94–101 (2023).
pubmed: 37100916
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05941-9
Castle, S. E., Miller, D. C., Merten, N., Ordonez, P. J. & Baylis, K. Evidence for the impacts of agroforestry on ecosystem services and human well-being in high-income countries: a systematic map. Environ. Evid. 11, 10 (2022).
doi: 10.1186/s13750-022-00260-4
Ghale, B., Mitra, E., Sodhi, H. S., Verma, A. K. & Kumar, S. Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems and its potential in climate change mitigation. Water Air Soil Pollut. 233, 228 (2022).
doi: 10.1007/s11270-022-05689-4
Dittmer, K. M. et al. Agroecology can promote climate change adaptation outcomes without compromising yield in smallholder systems. Environ. Manage. 72, 333–342 (2023).
pubmed: 37004534
pmcid: 10287806
doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01816-x
Rising, J. & Devineni, N. Crop switching reduces agricultural losses from climate change in the United States by half under RCP 8.5. Nat. Commun. 11, 4991 (2020).
pubmed: 33020479
pmcid: 7536391
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18725-w
Chen, J. et al. Diversity increases yield but reduces harvest index in crop mixtures. Nat. Plants 7, 893–898 (2021).
pubmed: 34168319
pmcid: 7611346
doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00948-4
Dainese, M. et al. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax0121 (2019).
pubmed: 31663019
pmcid: 6795509
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax0121
Bellora, C., Blanc, É., Bourgeon, J.-M. & Strobl, E. Estimating The Impact of Crop Diversity on Agricultural Productivity in South Africa Working Paper 23496, 1–32 (NBER, 2017); https://doi.org/10.3386/w23496
Stefan, L., Hartmann, M., Engbersen, N., Six, J. & Schöb, C. Positive effects of crop diversity on productivity driven by changes in soil microbial composition. Front. Microbiol. 12, 808 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.660749
Davis, A. S., Hill, J. D., Chase, C. A., Johanns, A. M. & Liebman, M. Increasing cropping system diversity balances productivity, profitability and environmental health. PLoS ONE 7, e47149 (2012).
pubmed: 23071739
pmcid: 3468434
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047149
Donfouet, H. P. P., Barczak, A., Détang-Dessendre, C. & Maigné, E. Crop production and crop diversity in France: a spatial analysis. Ecol. Econ. 134, 29–39 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.11.016
Li, C. et al. Crop diversity for yield increase. PLoS ONE 4, e8049 (2009).
pubmed: 19956624
pmcid: 2778130
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008049
Beillouin, D., Ben-Ari, T., Malézieux, E., Seufert, V. & Makowski, D. Positive but variable effects of crop diversification on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 4697–4710 (2021).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.15747
Tack, J. et al. Impact of heat stress on crop yield—on the importance of considering canopy temperature. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 044012 (2014).
doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/044012
Webber, H. et al. Canopy temperature for simulation of heat stress in irrigated wheat in a semi-arid environment: a multi-model comparison. Field Crops Res. 202, 21–35 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.10.009
Nyawade, S. O. et al. Intercropping optimizes soil temperature and increases crop water productivity and radiation use efficiency of rainfed potato. Am. J. Potato Res. 96, 457–471 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s12230-019-09737-4
Amthor, J. S. Effects of atmospheric CO
doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00179-4
Díaz, R. A., Magrín, G. O., Travasso, M. I. & Rodríguez, R. O. Climate change and its impact on the properties of agricultural soils in the Argentinean Rolling Pampas. Clim. Res. 9, 25–30 (1997).
doi: 10.3354/cr009025
Tubiello, F. N., Donatelli, M., Rosenzweig, C. & Stockle, C. O. Effects of climate change and elevated CO
doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00073-3
Paustian, K., Elliott, E. T., Peterson, G. A. & Killian, K. Modelling climate, CO
doi: 10.1007/BF00017100
Teixeira, E. et al. Limited potential of crop management for mitigating surface ozone impacts on global food supply. Atmos. Environ. 45, 2569–2576 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.002
Ewert, F., Van Oijen, M. & Porter, J. R. Simulation of growth and development processes of spring wheat in response to CO
doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(99)00013-1
Tao, F., Feng, Z., Tang, H., Chen, Y. & Kobayashi, K. Effects of climate change, CO
doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.032
Tai, A. P. K., Sadiq, M., Pang, J. Y. S., Yung, D. H. Y. & Feng, Z. Impacts of surface ozone pollution on global crop yields: comparing different ozone exposure metrics and incorporating co-effects of CO
doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.534616
Dijkstra, F. A. et al. Effects of elevated carbon dioxide and increased temperature on methane and nitrous oxide fluxes: evidence from field experiments. Front. Ecol. Environ. 10, 520–527 (2012).
doi: 10.1890/120059
Agathokleous, E. et al. Ethylenediurea (EDU) spray effects on willows (Salix sachalinensis F. Schmid) grown in ambient or ozone-enriched air: implications for renewable biomass production. J. For. Res. 33, 397–422 (2022).
doi: 10.1007/s11676-021-01400-1
Agathokleous, E. et al. Ethylenediurea (EDU) effects on Japanese larch: an one growing season experiment with simulated regenerating communities and a four growing season application to individual saplings. J. For. Res. 32, 2047–2057 (2021).
doi: 10.1007/s11676-020-01223-6
Saitanis, C. J. & Agathokleous, E. Exogenous application of chemicals for protecting plants against ambient ozone pollution: what should come next? Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 19, 100215 (2021).
pubmed: 33073070
doi: 10.1016/j.coesh.2020.10.003
Tiwari, S. Ethylenediurea as a potential tool in evaluating ozone phytotoxicity: a review study on physiological, biochemical and morphological responses of plants. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24, 14019–14039 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8859-y
Agathokleous, E. Perspectives for elucidating the ethylenediurea (EDU) mode of action for protection against O
pubmed: 28478379
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.04.057
Lakaew, K., Akeprathumchai, S. & Thiravetyan, P. Foliar spraying of calcium acetate alleviates yield loss in rice (Oryza sativa L.) by induced anti-oxidative defence system under ozone and heat stresses. Ann. Appl. Biol. 178, 414–426 (2021).
doi: 10.1111/aab.12653
Salvatori, E., Fusaro, L. & Manes, F. Effects of the antiozonant ethylenediurea (EDU) on Fraxinus ornus L.: the role of drought. Forests 8, 320 (2017).
doi: 10.3390/f8090320
Mina, U., Smiti, K. & Yadav, P. Thermotolerant wheat cultivar (Triticum aestivum L. var. WR544) response to ozone, EDU, and particulate matter interactive exposure. Environ. Monit. Assess. 193, 318 (2021).
pubmed: 33942175
doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-09079-x
Surabhi, S., Pande, V. & Pandey, V. Ethylenediurea (EDU) mediated protection from ambient ozone-induced oxidative stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under a high CO
doi: 10.1016/j.apr.2022.101503
Kannaujia, R., Singh, P., Prasad, V. & Pandey, V. Evaluating impacts of biogenic silver nanoparticles and ethylenediurea on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) against ozone-induced damages. Environ. Res. 203, 111857 (2022).
pubmed: 34400164
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111857
Picchi, V., Gobbi, S., Fattizzo, M., Zefelippo, M. & Faoro, F. Chitosan nanoparticles loaded with N-acetyl cysteine to mitigate ozone and other possible oxidative stresses in durum wheat. Plants 10, 691 (2021).
pubmed: 33918532
pmcid: 8065401
doi: 10.3390/plants10040691
Yakhin, O. I., Lubyanov, A. A., Yakhin, I. A. & Brown, P. H. Biostimulants in plant science: a global perspective. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 2049 (2017).
pubmed: 28184225
pmcid: 5266735
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.02049
Godínez-Mendoza, P. L. et al. Plant hormesis: revising of the concepts of biostimulation, elicitation and their application in a sustainable agricultural production. Sci. Total Environ. 894, 164883 (2023).
pubmed: 37348730
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164883
Majkowska-Gadomska, J., Dobrowolski, A., Jadwisieńczak, K. K., Kaliniewicz, Z. & Francke, A. Effect of biostimulants on the growth, yield and nutritional value of Capsicum annuum grown in an unheated plastic tunnel. Sci. Rep. 11, 22335 (2021).
pubmed: 34785738
pmcid: 8595353
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01834-x
Calvo, P., Nelson, L. & Kloepper, J. W. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil 383, 3–41 (2014).
doi: 10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8
Nephali, L. et al. Biostimulants for plant growth and mitigation of abiotic stresses: a metabolomics perspective. Metabolites 10, 505 (2020).
pubmed: 33321781
pmcid: 7764227
doi: 10.3390/metabo10120505
Shahrajabian, M. H., Chaski, C., Polyzos, N. & Petropoulos, S. A. Biostimulants application: a low input cropping management tool for sustainable farming of vegetables. Biomolecules 11, 698 (2021).
pubmed: 34067181
pmcid: 8150747
doi: 10.3390/biom11050698
Macias-Benitez, S. et al. Biostimulant capacity of an enzymatic extract from rice bran against ozone-induced damage in Capsicum annum. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 2573 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.749422
Vannini, A., Fedeli, R., Guarnieri, M. & Loppi, S. Foliar application of wood distillate alleviates ozone-induced damage in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Toxics 10, 178 (2022).
pubmed: 35448439
pmcid: 9031150
doi: 10.3390/toxics10040178
Liu, L. et al. Protecting tobacco plants from O
pubmed: 32386333
doi: 10.1111/ppl.13120
Agathokleous, E. et al. Exogenous application of melatonin to plants, algae, and harvested products to sustain agricultural productivity and enhance nutritional and nutraceutical value: a meta-analysis. Environ. Res. 200, 111746 (2021).
pubmed: 34302829
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111746
Arnao, M. B. & Hernández-Ruiz, J. Functions of melatonin in plants: a review. J. Pineal Res. 59, 133–150 (2015).
pubmed: 26094813
doi: 10.1111/jpi.12253
Arnao, M. B. & Hernández-Ruiz, J. Melatonin as a plant biostimulant in crops and during post-harvest: a new approach is needed. J. Sci. Food Agric. 101, 5297–5304 (2021).
pubmed: 34002381
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.11318
Mauch-Mani, B., Baccelli, I., Luna, E. & Flors, V. Defense priming: an adaptive part of induced resistance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 68, 485–512 (2017).
pubmed: 28226238
doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042916-041132
Westman, S. M., Kloth, K. J., Hanson, J., Ohlsson, A. B. & Albrectsen, B. R. Defence priming in Arabidopsis – a meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 9, 13309 (2019).
pubmed: 31527672
pmcid: 6746867
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49811-9
Christou, A., Agathokleous, E. & Fotopoulos, V. Safeguarding food security: hormesis-based plant priming to the rescue. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 28, 100374 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.coesh.2022.100374
Savvides, A., Ali, S., Tester, M. & Fotopoulos, V. Chemical priming of plants against multiple abiotic stresses: mission possible. Trends Plant Sci. 21, 329–340 (2016).
pubmed: 26704665
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.11.003
Acharya, P., Jayaprakasha, G. K., Crosby, K. M., Jifon, J. L. & Patil, B. S. Nanoparticle-mediated seed priming improves germination, growth, yield, and quality of watermelons (Citrullus lanatus) at multi-locations in Texas. Sci. Rep. 10, 5037 (2020).
pubmed: 32193449
pmcid: 7081193
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61696-7
Farooq, M. et al. Influence of seed priming techniques on grain yield and economic returns of bread wheat planted at different spacings. Crop Pasture Sci. 71, 725–738 (2020).
doi: 10.1071/CP20065
Sime, G. & Aune, J. B. On-farm seed priming and fertilizer micro-dosing: agronomic and economic responses of maize in semi-arid Ethiopia. Food Energy Secur. 9, e190 (2020).
doi: 10.1002/fes3.190
Atefi, A., Ge, Y., Pitla, S. & Schnable, J. Robotic technologies for high-throughput plant phenotyping: contemporary reviews and future perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 1082 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.611940
Balafoutis, A. et al. Precision agriculture technologies positively contributing to GHG emissions mitigation, farm productivity and economics. Sustainability 9, 1339 (2017).
doi: 10.3390/su9081339
Morisse, M. et al. A European perspective on opportunities and demands for field-based crop phenotyping. Field Crops Res. 276, 108371 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108371
Watt, M. et al. Phenotyping: new windows into the plant for breeders. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 71, 689–712 (2020).
pubmed: 32097567
doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042916-041124
Liu, S. et al. Climatic role of terrestrial ecosystem under elevated CO
pubmed: 29736982
doi: 10.1111/ele.13078
Van Groenigen, K. J., Qi, X., Osenberg, C. W., Luo, Y. & Hungate, B. A. Faster decomposition under increased atmospheric CO
pubmed: 24762538
doi: 10.1126/science.1249534
Cheng, L. et al. Warming enhances old organic carbon decomposition through altering functional microbial communities. ISME J. 11, 1825 (2017).
pubmed: 28430189
pmcid: 5520036
doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.48
Qiu, Y. et al. Warming and elevated ozone induce tradeoffs between fine roots and mycorrhizal fungi and stimulate organic carbon decomposition. Sci. Adv. 7, abe9256 (2021).
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe9256
Schmidt, M. W. I. et al. Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature 478, 49–56 (2011).
pubmed: 21979045
doi: 10.1038/nature10386
Oldfield, E. E., Bradford, M. A. & Wood, S. A. Global meta-analysis of the relationship between soil organic matter and crop yields. SOIL 5, 15–32 (2019).
doi: 10.5194/soil-5-15-2019
Crystal-Ornelas, R., Thapa, R. & Tully, K. L. Soil organic carbon is affected by organic amendments, conservation tillage, and cover cropping in organic farming systems: a meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 312, 107356 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107356
Diacono, M. & Montemurro, F. Long-term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 30, 401–422 (2010).
doi: 10.1051/agro/2009040
Aguilera, E. et al. Agroecology for adaptation to climate change and resource depletion in the Mediterranean region. A review. Agric. Syst. 181, 102809 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102809
Damm, A. et al. Response times of remote sensing measured sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence, surface temperature and vegetation indices to evolving soil water limitation in a crop canopy. Remote Sens. Environ. 273, 112957 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2022.112957
Drusch, M. et al. The FLuorescence EXplorer mission concept—ESA’s Earth Explorer 8. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 55, 1273–1284 (2017).
doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2621820
Kumar, S. et al. in Natural Resources Conservation and Advances for Sustainability (eds Jhariya, M.K. et al.) 91–135 (Elsevier, 2022).
Alexander, P. et al. High energy and fertilizer prices are more damaging than food export curtailment from Ukraine and Russia for food prices, health and the environment. Nat. Food 4, 84–95 (2022).
pubmed: 37118577
doi: 10.1038/s43016-022-00659-9
Fowler, D. et al. Atmospheric composition change: ecosystems–atmosphere interactions. Atmos. Environ. 43, 5193–5267 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.068
Gerosa, G. et al. Comparison of seasonal variations of ozone exposure and fluxes in a Mediterranean Holm oak forest between the exceptionally dry 2003 and the following year. Environ. Pollut. 157, 1737–1744 (2009).
pubmed: 18180087
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.11.025
Lobell, D. B., Bonfils, C. J., Kueppers, L. M. & Snyder, M. A. Irrigation cooling effect on temperature and heat index extremes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, 9705 (2008).
doi: 10.1029/2008GL034145
Vogel, E. et al. The effects of climate extremes on global agricultural yields. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 054010 (2019).
doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab154b
Eyshi Rezaei, E., Webber, H., Gaiser, T., Naab, J. & Ewert, F. Heat stress in cereals: mechanisms and modelling. Eur. J. Agron. 64, 98–113 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2014.10.003
Mcgill, B. M. et al. The greenhouse gas cost of agricultural intensification with groundwater irrigation in a Midwest U.S. row cropping system. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 5948–5960 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.14472
Cayuela, M. L. et al. Direct nitrous oxide emissions in Mediterranean climate cropping systems: emission factors based on a meta-analysis of available measurement data. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 238, 25–35 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.10.006
Li, J., Mahalov, A. & Hyde, P. Impacts of agricultural irrigation on ozone concentrations in the Central Valley of California and in the contiguous United States based on WRF-Chem simulations. Agric. For. Meteorol. 221, 34–49 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.02.004
Massad, R. S. et al. Reviews and syntheses: influences of landscape structure and land uses on local to regional climate and air quality. Biogeosciences 16, 2369–2408 (2019).
doi: 10.5194/bg-16-2369-2019
Gleeson, T. et al. The water planetary boundary: interrogation and revision. One Earth 2, 223–234 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.009
Neupane, R. P. & Kumar, S. Estimating the effects of potential climate and land use changes on hydrologic processes of a large agriculture dominated watershed. J. Hydrol. 529, 418–429 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.07.050
Chisola, M. N., van der Laan, M. & Bristow, K. L. A landscape hydrology approach to inform sustainable water resource management under a changing environment. A case study for the Kaleya River Catchment, Zambia. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 32, 100762 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2020.100762
Arenas-Corraliza, M. G., López-Díaz, M. L. & Moreno, G. Winter cereal production in a Mediterranean silvoarable walnut system in the face of climate change. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 264, 111–118 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.024
Kanzler, M., Böhm, C., Mirck, J., Schmitt, D. & Veste, M. Microclimate effects on evaporation and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield within a temperate agroforestry system. Agrofor. Syst. 93, 1821–1841 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/s10457-018-0289-4
Liste, H. H. & White, J. C. Plant hydraulic lift of soil water – implications for crop production and land restoration. Plant Soil. 313, 1–17 (2008).
doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9696-z
IPCC Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report (eds Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R. K. & Meyer L. A.) Topic 1 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
Bezner Kerr, R. et al. in Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Pörtner, H. O. et al.) Ch. 5 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).
Mills, G. et al. Ozone pollution will compromise efforts to increase global wheat production. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 3560–3574 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.14157
Schiferl, L. D. & Heald, C. L. Particulate matter air pollution may offset ozone damage to global crop production. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 5953–5966 (2018).
doi: 10.5194/acp-18-5953-2018
Chenu, K. et al. Contribution of crop models to adaptation in wheat. Trends Plant Sci. 22, 472–490 (2017).
pubmed: 28389147
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.02.003
Asseng, S. et al. Rising temperatures reduce global wheat production. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 143–147 (2014).
doi: 10.1038/nclimate2470
Tang, H., Takigawa, M., Liu, G., Zhu, J. & Kobayashi, K. A projection of ozone-induced wheat production loss in China and India for the years 2000 and 2020 with exposure-based and flux-based approaches. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 2739–2752 (2013).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.12252
Rosenzweig, C. et al. The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP): protocols and pilot studies. Agric. For. Meteorol. 170, 166–182 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.011
Wang, E. et al. The uncertainty of crop yield projections is reduced by improved temperature response functions. Nat. Plants 3, 17102 (2017).
pubmed: 28714956
doi: 10.1038/nplants.2017.102
Broberg, M. C., Feng, Z., Xin, Y. & Pleijel, H. Ozone effects on wheat grain quality – a summary. Environ. Pollut. 197, 203–213 (2015).
pubmed: 25577485
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.12.009
Emberson, L. D. et al. Ozone effects on crops and consideration in crop models. Eur. J. Agron. 100, 19–34 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2018.06.002
Droutsas, I., Challinor, A. J., Arnold, S. R., Mikkelsen, T. N. & Hansen, E. M. Ø. A new model of ozone stress in wheat including grain yield loss and plant acclimation to the pollutant. Eur. J. Agron. 120, 126125 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2020.126125
Guarin, J. R., Kassie, B., Mashaheet, A. M., Burkey, K. & Asseng, S. Modeling the effects of tropospheric ozone on wheat growth and yield. Eur. J. Agron. 105, 13–23 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2019.02.004
Agathokleous, E. et al. Predicting the effect of ozone on vegetation via linear non-threshold (LNT), threshold and hormetic dose-response models. Sci. Total Environ. 649, 61–74 (2019).
pubmed: 30172135
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.264
Heath, R. L., Lefohn, A. S. & Musselman, R. C. Temporal processes that contribute to nonlinearity in vegetation responses to ozone exposure and dose. Atmos. Environ. 43, 2919–2928 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.03.011
Mohammadi, S., Rydgren, K., Bakkestuen, V. & Gillespie, M. A. K. Impacts of recent climate change on crop yield can depend on local conditions in climatically diverse regions of Norway. Sci. Rep. 13, 3633 (2023).
pubmed: 36869138
pmcid: 9984402
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30813-7
Altieri, M. A. & Nicholls, C. I. The adaptation and mitigation potential of traditional agriculture in a changing climate. Climatic Change. 140, 33–45 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0909-y
Schiermeier, Q. Eat less meat: UN climate-change report calls for change to human diet. Nature 572, 291–292 (2019).
pubmed: 31409926
doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02409-7
Liu, X. et al. Dietary shifts can reduce premature deaths related to particulate matter pollution in China. Nat. Food 2, 997–1004 (2021).
pubmed: 37118261
doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00430-6
Xia, L. & Yan, X. Maximizing Earth’s feeding capacity. Nat. Food 4, 353–354 (2023).
pubmed: 37117604
doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00736-7
Schipper, E. L. F., Dubash, N. K. & Mulugetta, Y. Climate change research and the search for solutions: rethinking interdisciplinarity. Climatic Change 168, 18 (2021).
pubmed: 34690385
pmcid: 8520790
doi: 10.1007/s10584-021-03237-3
Lang, D. J. et al. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain. Sci. 7, 25–43 (2012).
doi: 10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x