Performance Effect of Adjusting Insulin Sensitivity for Model-Based Automated Insulin Delivery Systems.


Journal

Journal of diabetes science and technology
ISSN: 1932-2968
Titre abrégé: J Diabetes Sci Technol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101306166

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2023
Historique:
pmc-release: 20 10 2024
medline: 2 11 2023
pubmed: 21 10 2023
entrez: 21 10 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Model predictive control (MPC) has become one of the most popular control strategies for automated insulin delivery (AID) in type 1 diabetes (T1D). These algorithms rely on a prediction model to determine the best insulin dosing every sampling time. Although these algorithms have been shown to be safe and effective for glucose management through clinical trials, managing the ever-fluctuating relationship between insulin delivery and resulting glucose uptake (aka insulin sensitivity, IS) remains a challenge. We aim to evaluate the effect of informing an AID system with IS on the performance of the system. The University of Virginia (UVA) MPC control-based hybrid closed-loop (HCL) and fully closed-loop (FCL) system was used. One-day simulations at varying levels of IS were run with the UVA/Padova T1D Simulator. The AID system was informed with an estimated value of IS obtained through a mixed meal glucose tolerance test. Relevant controller parameters are updated to inform insulin dosing of IS. Performance of the HCL/FCL system with and without information of the changing IS was assessed using a novel performance metric penalizing the time outside the target glucose range. Feedback in AID systems provides a certain degree tolerance to changes in IS. However, IS-informed bolus and basal dosing improve glycemic outcomes, providing increased protection against hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia according to the individual's physiological state. The proof-of-concept analysis presented here shows the potentially beneficial effects on system performance of informing the AID system with accurate estimates of IS. In particular, when considering reduced IS, the informed controller provides increased protection against hyperglycemia compared with the naïve controller. Similarly, reduced hypoglycemia is obtained for situations with increased IS. Further tailoring of the adaptation schemes proposed in this work is needed to overcome the increased hypoglycemia observed in the more resistant cases and to optimize the performance of the adaptation method.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Model predictive control (MPC) has become one of the most popular control strategies for automated insulin delivery (AID) in type 1 diabetes (T1D). These algorithms rely on a prediction model to determine the best insulin dosing every sampling time. Although these algorithms have been shown to be safe and effective for glucose management through clinical trials, managing the ever-fluctuating relationship between insulin delivery and resulting glucose uptake (aka insulin sensitivity, IS) remains a challenge. We aim to evaluate the effect of informing an AID system with IS on the performance of the system.
METHOD
The University of Virginia (UVA) MPC control-based hybrid closed-loop (HCL) and fully closed-loop (FCL) system was used. One-day simulations at varying levels of IS were run with the UVA/Padova T1D Simulator. The AID system was informed with an estimated value of IS obtained through a mixed meal glucose tolerance test. Relevant controller parameters are updated to inform insulin dosing of IS. Performance of the HCL/FCL system with and without information of the changing IS was assessed using a novel performance metric penalizing the time outside the target glucose range.
RESULTS
Feedback in AID systems provides a certain degree tolerance to changes in IS. However, IS-informed bolus and basal dosing improve glycemic outcomes, providing increased protection against hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia according to the individual's physiological state.
CONCLUSIONS
The proof-of-concept analysis presented here shows the potentially beneficial effects on system performance of informing the AID system with accurate estimates of IS. In particular, when considering reduced IS, the informed controller provides increased protection against hyperglycemia compared with the naïve controller. Similarly, reduced hypoglycemia is obtained for situations with increased IS. Further tailoring of the adaptation schemes proposed in this work is needed to overcome the increased hypoglycemia observed in the more resistant cases and to optimize the performance of the adaptation method.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37864340
doi: 10.1177/19322968231206798
pmc: PMC10658700
doi:

Substances chimiques

Hypoglycemic Agents 0
Blood Glucose 0
Insulin 0
Insulin, Regular, Human 0
Glucose IY9XDZ35W2

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1470-1481

Subventions

Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK129553
Pays : United States

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: M.M-.V. receives research support and royalties through her institution from Dexcom. C.F. receives royalties from Dexcom and Novo Nordisk managed through her institution. M.D.B. receives research support through his institution from Tandem, Dexcom, and Novo Nordisk; M.D.B. received honorarium and travel compensation from Sanofi and Tandem; M.D.B. consults for Dexcom and Sanofi.

Références

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018 Mar;65(3):479-488
pubmed: 28092515
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Nov;211:106401
pubmed: 34560603
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Mar;12(2):273-281
pubmed: 29451021
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Dec;10(6):441-4
pubmed: 19049372
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jan;11(1):29-36
pubmed: 27613658
Diabetes Care. 2020 Apr;43(4):799-805
pubmed: 32144167
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Jan;3(1):44-55
pubmed: 19444330
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007 Oct;54(10):1740-9
pubmed: 17926672
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Sep;8(5):1035-41
pubmed: 24876436
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020 Sep;24(9):2681-2689
pubmed: 31995506
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017 Jul;13(7):425-436
pubmed: 28304392
Diabetes. 2014 Apr;63(4):1203-13
pubmed: 24651807
IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2009 Jan 1;2:54-96
pubmed: 20936056
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Nov;13(6):1044-1053
pubmed: 31595784
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Sep 01;4(5):1174-81
pubmed: 20920437
Physiol Meas. 2004 Aug;25(4):905-20
pubmed: 15382830
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 May;24(5):362-371
pubmed: 35099302
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 18;375(7):644-54
pubmed: 27532830
Endocr Rev. 2019 Dec 1;40(6):1521-1546
pubmed: 31276160
Diabetes. 2013 Jul;62(7):2223-9
pubmed: 23447123
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007 Nov;1(6):834-41
pubmed: 19756210
Control Eng Pract. 2023 Feb;131:
pubmed: 36506413
Diabetes Care. 2021 Aug 15;:
pubmed: 34400480
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 7;12(11):e0187754
pubmed: 29112978
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008 Jul;2(4):630-5
pubmed: 19885239
Diabetes Care. 2016 Jul;39(7):1135-42
pubmed: 27289127

Auteurs

Marcela Moscoso-Vasquez (M)

Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Chiara Fabris (C)

Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Marc D Breton (MD)

Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH