Mapping of Iranian midwifery curriculum according to the International Confederation of midwives competencies.
Competence
Curriculum
Educational standards
International Confederation of Midwives
Midwifery education
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Oct 2023
24 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
02
03
2023
accepted:
09
10
2023
medline:
27
10
2023
pubmed:
25
10
2023
entrez:
24
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Evaluating the curriculum based on its success rate in preparing skilled midwives proficient in performing professional skills is a fundamental component of the midwifery education system. This study aimed to evaluate the content, strengths, and weaknesses of the midwifery curriculum in Iran based on the most recent ICM midwifery education standards in all competence areas, as well as to obtain expert feedback on the necessary courses or lessons for the curriculum using the Delphi method. This research was conducted in two phases: comparative analysis and the Delphi method. In the comparative analysis, the curriculum mapping tool was used to compare Iran's midwifery curriculum for bachelor's degrees to the international standards for midwifery education proposed by ICM in 2019 by a four-point Likert scale (adequate- relatively adequate- relatively inadequate- inadequate). Two individuals evaluated the curriculum independently for the presence of theoretical and clinical courses for attaining each relevant competency. In case of disagreement, the opinion of a third person was used. After identifying the academic deficiencies and weaknesses of the curriculum, the Delphi technique was used with the cooperation of the midwifery board members and directors of midwifery groups from across the country to collect feedback about new courses or lessons that need to be incorporated into the curriculum. After a comparative analysis, 24 out of 315 essential competencies for ICM in the midwifery curriculum were found to be inadequate or relatively inadequate based on the three experts' opinions after reviewing the programmatic courses and lessons in the curriculum. In 79.5% of the knowledge area and 71.6% of the skill area, the curriculum for midwifery in Iran corresponded to ICM essential competencies. After surveying expert members during multiple Delphi rounds, the members agreed to add some lessons to the midwifery curriculum, design a new course, and hold related workshops to cover the competencies identified as inadequate or relatively inadequate in the comparative analysis. The Iranian midwifery curriculum for acquiring 24 items of ICM essential competencies was deemed inadequate or relatively inadequate. Therefore, it seems in addition to revising Iran's midwifery curriculum following ICM competencies, providing midwifery policymakers with infrastructure and additional support to develop and implement effective midwifery training programs is necessary to ensure that midwives are trained and equipped with the necessary competencies for practice.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Evaluating the curriculum based on its success rate in preparing skilled midwives proficient in performing professional skills is a fundamental component of the midwifery education system. This study aimed to evaluate the content, strengths, and weaknesses of the midwifery curriculum in Iran based on the most recent ICM midwifery education standards in all competence areas, as well as to obtain expert feedback on the necessary courses or lessons for the curriculum using the Delphi method.
METHODS
METHODS
This research was conducted in two phases: comparative analysis and the Delphi method. In the comparative analysis, the curriculum mapping tool was used to compare Iran's midwifery curriculum for bachelor's degrees to the international standards for midwifery education proposed by ICM in 2019 by a four-point Likert scale (adequate- relatively adequate- relatively inadequate- inadequate). Two individuals evaluated the curriculum independently for the presence of theoretical and clinical courses for attaining each relevant competency. In case of disagreement, the opinion of a third person was used. After identifying the academic deficiencies and weaknesses of the curriculum, the Delphi technique was used with the cooperation of the midwifery board members and directors of midwifery groups from across the country to collect feedback about new courses or lessons that need to be incorporated into the curriculum.
RESULTS
RESULTS
After a comparative analysis, 24 out of 315 essential competencies for ICM in the midwifery curriculum were found to be inadequate or relatively inadequate based on the three experts' opinions after reviewing the programmatic courses and lessons in the curriculum. In 79.5% of the knowledge area and 71.6% of the skill area, the curriculum for midwifery in Iran corresponded to ICM essential competencies. After surveying expert members during multiple Delphi rounds, the members agreed to add some lessons to the midwifery curriculum, design a new course, and hold related workshops to cover the competencies identified as inadequate or relatively inadequate in the comparative analysis.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The Iranian midwifery curriculum for acquiring 24 items of ICM essential competencies was deemed inadequate or relatively inadequate. Therefore, it seems in addition to revising Iran's midwifery curriculum following ICM competencies, providing midwifery policymakers with infrastructure and additional support to develop and implement effective midwifery training programs is necessary to ensure that midwives are trained and equipped with the necessary competencies for practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37875917
doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04755-7
pii: 10.1186/s12909-023-04755-7
pmc: PMC10599037
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
791Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Women Birth. 2012 Dec;25(4):e47-55
pubmed: 21955442
Midwifery. 2016 Feb;33:3-6
pubmed: 26809369
Women Birth. 2020 Mar;33(2):111-118
pubmed: 31575454
Midwifery. 2011 Aug;27(4):409-16
pubmed: 21550149
Midwifery. 2003 Sep;19(3):174-90
pubmed: 12946334
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016 Nov 15;13:41
pubmed: 27894183
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016 Sep;61(5):586-592
pubmed: 27341667
Midwifery. 2018 Nov;66:168-175
pubmed: 30193133
Midwifery. 2014 Aug;30(8):956-61
pubmed: 23938164
Glob Health Action. 2020;13(1):1717409
pubmed: 31983317
Midwifery. 2013 Oct;29(10):1129-36
pubmed: 23906879
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Oct;31(10):974-979
pubmed: 19941728
Women Birth. 2021 Nov;34(6):514-530
pubmed: 33358129
Hum Resour Health. 2016 Jun 08;14(1):37
pubmed: 27278786