Medication Abortion Safety and Effectiveness With Misoprostol Alone.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 10 2023
02 10 2023
Historique:
medline:
30
10
2023
pubmed:
27
10
2023
entrez:
27
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Misoprostol-alone regimens for abortion may be more effective than previously thought. To estimate the effectiveness of medication abortion with misoprostol alone among individuals self-managing their abortion. For this prospective observational cohort study of callers to safe abortion hotlines and accompaniment groups in Argentina, Nigeria, and Southeast Asia, participants were recruited between July 31, 2019, and October 1, 2020, prior to starting their medication abortion. Eligible participants were 13 years or older, had no contraindications to medication abortion, and were not currently bleeding. Participants completed a baseline and 2 follow-up surveys. The analysis was restricted to participants who reported using misoprostol alone and was performed between January 6, 2022 and September 8, 2023. Self-managed medication abortion using misoprostol alone. The primary outcome was effectiveness, defined as participant self-report of complete abortion without procedural intervention, measured at 1 week and 3 weeks after taking misoprostol. Secondary outcomes included method safety, measured by self-report of experiencing warning signs (eg, heavy bleeding, pain, fever, discharge) indicative of a potential complication and by medical treatment (eg, blood transfusion, intravenous fluids, overnight hospital stay) indicative of a potential adverse event. Additional outcomes included length of bleeding and cramping, time to expulsion, and experience of adverse effects. Among 1352 enrolled participants, 637 used misoprostol-alone regimens for abortion and were included in the analysis (591 [92.8%] from Nigeria, 45 [7.1%] from Southeast Asia, and 1 [0.2%] from Argentina; 384 [60.2%] aged 20-29 years; 317 [49.8%] with pregnancy durations <7 weeks and 205 [32.2%] with pregnancy durations between 7 and <9 weeks). At last follow-up after taking medication (median, 22 days; IQR, 21-26 days), 625 participants (98.1%; 95% CI, 96.7%-98.9%) had a complete abortion without procedural intervention. Potential adverse events were reported by 6 participants (0.9%; 95% CI, 0.4%-2.1%). Most participants experienced bleeding for less than 1 week (median, 4 days; IQR, 3-6 days) and expelled their pregnancy within 24 hours of starting the abortion process (median, 12 hours; IQR, 9-15 hours). Common side effects included nausea (335 participants [52.6%]), fever (232 [36.4%]), and diarrhea (181 [28.4%]). The findings suggest that misoprostol alone is a highly effective method of pregnancy termination. Future research should explore strategies to maximize the effectiveness of misoprostol alone in clinical and nonclinical settings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37889485
pii: 2811114
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.40042
pmc: PMC10611991
doi:
Substances chimiques
Misoprostol
0E43V0BB57
Mifepristone
320T6RNW1F
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2340042Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R21 CA256759
Pays : United States
Références
Contraception. 2013 Jan;87(1):26-37
pubmed: 22898359
Contraception. 2019 May;99(5):272-277
pubmed: 30831103
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;111(1):106-12
pubmed: 18165398
BMJ Open. 2020 May 5;10(5):e034670
pubmed: 32376752
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;133(1):137-147
pubmed: 30531568
Health Care Women Int. 2020 Oct;41(10):1128-1146
pubmed: 33156737
Reprod Health. 2022 May 2;19(1):107
pubmed: 35501904
Contraception. 2017 Oct;96(4):242-247
pubmed: 28651904
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Sep;138(3):363-366
pubmed: 28643396
Lancet. 2007 Jun 9;369(9577):1938-46
pubmed: 17560446
Contraception. 2023 May;121:109998
pubmed: 36849033
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;136(4):e31-e47
pubmed: 32804884
Epidemiology. 2023 Jan 1;34(1):140-149
pubmed: 36455250
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 May;226(5):710.e1-710.e21
pubmed: 34922922
Contraception. 2018 Feb;97(2):86-89
pubmed: 28780241
Reprod Health. 2020 Oct 27;17(1):164
pubmed: 33109230
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2018 May 7;:
pubmed: 29972364
Contraception. 2006 Jul;74(1):26-30
pubmed: 16781256
BJOG. 2008 Aug;115(9):1171-5; discussion 1175-8
pubmed: 18637010
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Jan;10(1):e105-e113
pubmed: 34801131
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(1):1829406
pubmed: 33111643
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Mar;55(1):4-11
pubmed: 36744631
Reprod Health Matters. 2018 Nov;26(54):13-19
pubmed: 30231807
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Aug;134 Suppl 1:S20-3
pubmed: 27577021
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022 Dec;30(1):2077282
pubmed: 35695259
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;34(1):104-9
pubmed: 19517421
Contraception. 2022 May;109:49-51
pubmed: 35077725
Contraception. 2023 Nov;127:110132
pubmed: 37517447
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 19;10(11):e036800
pubmed: 33444174
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;222(6):551-563.e13
pubmed: 31715147