Treatments for hyperemesis gravidarum: A systematic review.
PUQE
hyperemesis gravidarum
intervention
nausea
quality of life
systematic review
treatment
vomiting
Journal
Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
ISSN: 1600-0412
Titre abrégé: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Jan 2024
Historique:
revised:
26
09
2023
received:
07
04
2023
accepted:
01
10
2023
medline:
2
1
2024
pubmed:
28
10
2023
entrez:
28
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Hyperemesis gravidarum affects 0.3%-3% of pregnant women each year and is the leading cause of hospitalization in early pregnancy. Previous systematic reviews of available treatments have found a lack of consistent evidence, and few studies of high quality. Since 2016, no systematic review has been conducted and an up-to date review is requested. In a recent James Lind Alliance collaboration, it was clear that research on effective treatments is a high priority for both patients and clinicians. Searches without time limits were performed in the AMED, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases until June 26, 2023. Studies published before October 1, 2014 were identified from the review by O'Donnell et al., 2016. Selection criteria were randomized clinical trials and non-randomized studies of interventions comparing treatment of hyperemesis gravidarum with another treatment or placebo. Outcome variables included were: degree of nausea; vomiting; inability to tolerate oral fluids or food; hospital treatment; health-related quality of life, small-for-gestational-age infant; and preterm birth. Abstracts and full texts were screened, and risk of bias of the studies was assessed independently by two authors. Synthesis without meta-analysis was performed, and certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. PROSPERO (CRD42022303150). Twenty treatments were included in 25 studies with low or moderate risk of bias. The certainty of evidence was very low for all treatments except for acupressure in addition to standard care, which showed a possible moderate decrease in nausea and vomiting, with low certainty of evidence. Several scientific knowledge gaps were identified. Studies on treatments for hyperemesis gravidarum are few, and the certainty of evidence for different treatments is either low or very low. To establish more robust evidence, it is essential to use validated scoring systems, the recently established diagnostic criteria, clear descriptions and measurements of core outcomes and to perform larger studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37891710
doi: 10.1111/aogs.14706
pmc: PMC10755124
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13-29Subventions
Organisme : Statens beredning för medicinsk och social utvärdering
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).
Références
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Mar;194(3):815-20
pubmed: 16522418
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;124(4):743-748
pubmed: 25198263
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123(6):1272-1279
pubmed: 24807340
BJOG. 2020 Jul;127(8):983-992
pubmed: 32056342
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017 Apr;43(4):662-668
pubmed: 28418209
BJOG. 2020 Oct;127(11):1430-1437
pubmed: 32356413
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1979;58(5):453-5
pubmed: 231374
BJOG. 2018 Nov;125(12):1514-1521
pubmed: 29727913
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jul;78(1):33-6
pubmed: 2047064
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 May;115(5):975-981
pubmed: 20410771
Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Sep;106(3):812-820
pubmed: 28793989
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991 Jan 4;38(1):19-24
pubmed: 1988321
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2009;67(3):151-7
pubmed: 19077388
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Dec;66(6):409-414
pubmed: 27821979
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Oct;20(74):1-268
pubmed: 27731292
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 01;10(4):e0119962
pubmed: 25830549
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 May;186(5 Suppl Understanding):S228-31
pubmed: 12011891
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 11;(5):CD010607
pubmed: 27168518
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Nov;266:15-22
pubmed: 34555550
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018 Jan;61(1):30-37
pubmed: 29372147
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 Sep 12;5(1):62
pubmed: 31515515
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Sep;59(5):510-9
pubmed: 17645494
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep;227(3):414-429.e17
pubmed: 35367190
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Oct;179(4):921-4
pubmed: 9790371
Crit Care Med. 2006 Nov;34(11):2781-3
pubmed: 16957638
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89
pubmed: 33781348
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 May;174(5):1565-8
pubmed: 9065130
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Jul;104(3):240-3
pubmed: 27366130
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;121(2 Pt 1):291-298
pubmed: 23232754
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Dec;102(6):1250-4
pubmed: 14662211
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Nov;25(63):1-116
pubmed: 34782054
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919
pubmed: 27733354
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2013;20(2):e149-60
pubmed: 23913638
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Jan;103(1):13-29
pubmed: 37891710
Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Jan;45(1):77-81
pubmed: 15635314
BJOG. 2001 Jan;108(1):9-15
pubmed: 11213010
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Nov;52(11):1669-77
pubmed: 26212603
Contraception. 2007 Dec;76(6):451-5
pubmed: 18061703
Pharmacology. 2017;100(3-4):161-171
pubmed: 28641304
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898
pubmed: 31462531
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 5;7(12):e017566
pubmed: 29222135
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1999;48(4):232-6
pubmed: 10592423
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Jul;5(7):100997
pubmed: 37271593
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 15;11(1):e041254
pubmed: 33452191
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Sep;31(18):2492-2505
pubmed: 28614956
BMJ. 2020 Jan 16;368:l6890
pubmed: 31948937
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000 Oct;20(4):273-9
pubmed: 11027909