Role of fibular autograft in ankle arthrodesis fixed using cannulated screws: a proportional meta-analysis and systematic review.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 10 2023
30 10 2023
Historique:
received:
31
05
2023
accepted:
26
10
2023
medline:
1
11
2023
pubmed:
31
10
2023
entrez:
31
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ankle arthrodesis is commonly performed to treat end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of fibular autograft might increase the fusion rate and decrease the complication rate in ankle arthrodesis (AA) fixed using cannulated screws. To perform this PRISMA-compliant proportional meta-analysis, multiple databases were searched for studies in which patients undergone AA (using exclusively cannulated screws and augmented with fibular bone graft) were followed. The characteristics of the cohort, the study design, surgical details, the nonunion and complication rate at the longest follow-up were extracted and recorded. The modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS) was applied to appraise the quality of studies. Two groups were built: arthrodeses fixed with screws combined with cancellous autograft (G1) and arthrodeses fixed with screws combined with cancellous autograft and augmented with a lateral fibular onlay (G2). A third group (arthrodeses fixed with screws and no graft, G3) was extracted from previous literature for a further comparison. Overall, we included 306 ankles (296 patients) from ten series (ten studies). In G1 and G2 there were 118 ankles (111 patients) and 188 ankles (185 patients), respectively. In patients where cancellous autograft was used, a further augmentation with a fibular lateral strut autograft did not change significantly the nonunion (4% [95% CI 1-9] in G1 vs. 2% [95% CI 0-5) in G2, p = 0.99) nor the complication rate (18% [95% CI 0-36] in G1 vs. 13% [95% CI 6-21) in G2, p = 0.71). Upon comparison with 667 ankles (659 patients, G3) in which arthrodeses had been performed without grafting, the nonunion and complication rates did not differ significantly either (pooled estimates: 3% [95% CI 1-3) in G1 + G2 vs. 3% [95% CI 2-4] in G3, p = 0.73 for nonunion; 15% [8-23] in G1 + G2 vs. 13% [95% CI 9-17] in G3, p = 0.93 for complications). In ankle arthrodesis fixed with cannulated screws combined with cancellous autograft at the fusion site, a construct augmentation with a distal fibular onlay strut graft positioned laterally at the ankle joint does not reduce the risk of nonunion or complication. In general, the use of bone graft does not influence significantly the nonunion nor the complication rate as compared to non-grafted screw-fixed ankle arthrodeses.Kindly check and confirm the corresponding author mail id is correctly identified.It's all correct.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37903965
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46034-x
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-46034-x
pmc: PMC10616077
doi:
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
18614Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 22;15(10):e0241141
pubmed: 33091091
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Mar-Apr;61(2):233-238
pubmed: 34362652
J Orthop Sci. 2023 Feb 27;:
pubmed: 36858837
Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Apr;24(2):137-142
pubmed: 29409224
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 Jul-Aug;60(4):802-806
pubmed: 33824076
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Oct;25(7):1195-9
pubmed: 26148700
Foot Ankle Surg. 2008;14(3):153-7
pubmed: 19083634
Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 Sep;19(3):168-72
pubmed: 23830164
Acta Orthop Scand. 1996 Oct;67(5):473-8
pubmed: 8948253
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Dec 1;11(1):154
pubmed: 27903299
Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Oct;24(5):374-382
pubmed: 29409273
Foot Ankle Int. 2007 Mar;28(3):303-7
pubmed: 17371653
Foot Ankle Spec. 2023 May 11;:19386400231171508
pubmed: 37165889
Acta Ortop Bras. 2020 Mar-Apr;28(2):55-59
pubmed: 32425664
Foot Ankle Int. 1999 Apr;20(4):227-31
pubmed: 10229278
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010 Nov-Dec;49(6):508-12
pubmed: 20851000
Foot Ankle Spec. 2023 Jun;16(3):300-306
pubmed: 34713739
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2016 Apr;24(1):101-5
pubmed: 27122523
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Jul 6;104(13):1197-1203
pubmed: 35793798
Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Apr;30(4):353-60
pubmed: 19356361
Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 Apr;27(3):339-347
pubmed: 33419696
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2021 Dec 15;111(6):
pubmed: 35294161
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Mar-Apr;54(2):188-91
pubmed: 25116232
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Feb;105(1):139-144
pubmed: 30573399
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Jul;33(5):1557-1563
pubmed: 35732958
Arthroscopy. 2020 Oct;36(10):2738-2747
pubmed: 32497657
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jun;447:112-8
pubmed: 16741477
Orthop Surg. 2020 Aug;12(4):1108-1119
pubmed: 32558333
Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Apr;34(4):557-62
pubmed: 23449661
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct;43(5):332-5
pubmed: 15480411
Injury. 2023 Jul;54(7):110794
pubmed: 37188587