Identification of cell-type specific alternative transcripts in the multicellular alga Volvox carteri.
Chlamydomonas
Convergent transcription
Evolution
Gonidia
Multicellularity
Soma
Transcript isoforms
Volvocine
Journal
BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Oct 2023
30 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
09
03
2023
accepted:
06
08
2023
medline:
1
11
2023
pubmed:
31
10
2023
entrez:
31
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cell type specialization is a hallmark of complex multicellular organisms and is usually established through implementation of cell-type-specific gene expression programs. The multicellular green alga Volvox carteri has just two cell types, germ and soma, that have previously been shown to have very different transcriptome compositions which match their specialized roles. Here we interrogated another potential mechanism for differentiation in V. carteri, cell type specific alternative transcript isoforms (CTSAI). We used pre-existing predictions of alternative transcripts and de novo transcript assembly with HISAT2 and Ballgown software to compile a list of loci with two or more transcript isoforms, identified a small subset that were candidates for CTSAI, and manually curated this subset of genes to remove false positives. We experimentally verified three candidates using semi-quantitative RT-PCR to assess relative isoform abundance in each cell type. Of the 1978 loci with two or more predicted transcript isoforms 67 of these also showed cell type isoform expression biases. After curation 15 strong candidates for CTSAI were identified, three of which were experimentally verified, and their predicted gene product functions were evaluated in light of potential cell type specific roles. A comparison of genes with predicted alternative splicing from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, a unicellular relative of V. carteri, identified little overlap between ortholog pairs with alternative splicing in both species. Finally, we interrogated cell type expression patterns of 126 V. carteri predicted RNA binding protein (RBP) encoding genes and found 40 that showed either somatic or germ cell expression bias. These RBPs are potential mediators of CTSAI in V. carteri and suggest possible pre-adaptation for cell type specific RNA processing and a potential path for generating CTSAI in the early ancestors of metazoans and plants. We predicted numerous instances of alternative transcript isoforms in Volvox, only a small subset of which showed cell type specific isoform expression bias. However, the validated examples of CTSAI supported existing hypotheses about cell type specialization in V. carteri, and also suggested new hypotheses about mechanisms of functional specialization for their gene products. Our data imply that CTSAI operates as a minor but important component of V. carteri cellular differentiation and could be used as a model for how alternative isoforms emerge and co-evolve with cell type specialization.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Cell type specialization is a hallmark of complex multicellular organisms and is usually established through implementation of cell-type-specific gene expression programs. The multicellular green alga Volvox carteri has just two cell types, germ and soma, that have previously been shown to have very different transcriptome compositions which match their specialized roles. Here we interrogated another potential mechanism for differentiation in V. carteri, cell type specific alternative transcript isoforms (CTSAI).
METHODS
METHODS
We used pre-existing predictions of alternative transcripts and de novo transcript assembly with HISAT2 and Ballgown software to compile a list of loci with two or more transcript isoforms, identified a small subset that were candidates for CTSAI, and manually curated this subset of genes to remove false positives. We experimentally verified three candidates using semi-quantitative RT-PCR to assess relative isoform abundance in each cell type.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of the 1978 loci with two or more predicted transcript isoforms 67 of these also showed cell type isoform expression biases. After curation 15 strong candidates for CTSAI were identified, three of which were experimentally verified, and their predicted gene product functions were evaluated in light of potential cell type specific roles. A comparison of genes with predicted alternative splicing from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, a unicellular relative of V. carteri, identified little overlap between ortholog pairs with alternative splicing in both species. Finally, we interrogated cell type expression patterns of 126 V. carteri predicted RNA binding protein (RBP) encoding genes and found 40 that showed either somatic or germ cell expression bias. These RBPs are potential mediators of CTSAI in V. carteri and suggest possible pre-adaptation for cell type specific RNA processing and a potential path for generating CTSAI in the early ancestors of metazoans and plants.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We predicted numerous instances of alternative transcript isoforms in Volvox, only a small subset of which showed cell type specific isoform expression bias. However, the validated examples of CTSAI supported existing hypotheses about cell type specialization in V. carteri, and also suggested new hypotheses about mechanisms of functional specialization for their gene products. Our data imply that CTSAI operates as a minor but important component of V. carteri cellular differentiation and could be used as a model for how alternative isoforms emerge and co-evolve with cell type specialization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37904088
doi: 10.1186/s12864-023-09558-0
pii: 10.1186/s12864-023-09558-0
pmc: PMC10617192
doi:
Substances chimiques
Protein Isoforms
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
654Subventions
Organisme : Division of Integrative Organismal Systems
ID : 1755430
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Chembiochem. 2003 Oct 6;4(10):1024-32
pubmed: 14523920
Biochem J. 2002 Oct 1;367(Pt 1):295-300
pubmed: 12088504
G3 (Bethesda). 2018 Feb 2;8(2):531-550
pubmed: 29208647
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 3;106(9):3254-8
pubmed: 19223580
Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Jan;11(1):75-87
pubmed: 20019688
Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Dec;29(12):3625-39
pubmed: 22826458
Genome Res. 2010 Jan;20(1):45-58
pubmed: 19858364
G3 (Bethesda). 2020 Oct 5;10(10):3797-3810
pubmed: 32817123
Nat Protoc. 2016 Sep;11(9):1650-67
pubmed: 27560171
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Aug 14;98(17):9521-6
pubmed: 11493691
PLoS Genet. 2014 Jan;10(1):e1004021
pubmed: 24465217
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2017 Feb;35:61-67
pubmed: 27886593
J Mol Biol. 2007 Feb 23;366(3):830-41
pubmed: 17178129
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017 Jul;18(7):437-451
pubmed: 28488700
Science. 2012 Dec 21;338(6114):1587-93
pubmed: 23258890
Nat Genet. 2002 Jan;30(1):29-30
pubmed: 11743582
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012 Nov;19(11):1193-201
pubmed: 23022730
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 7;109(6):E326-35
pubmed: 22308336
J Cell Biol. 1993 Oct;123(1):191-208
pubmed: 8408198
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Mar;80(5):1387-91
pubmed: 6572396
Genes Dev. 1989 Apr;3(4):431-7
pubmed: 2470643
J Cell Biol. 2005 Jul 4;170(1):103-13
pubmed: 15998802
Trends Genet. 2015 Mar;31(3):128-39
pubmed: 25648499
J Phycol. 2021 Jun;57(3):967-974
pubmed: 33523505
Dev Biol. 1991 May;145(1):67-76
pubmed: 2019325
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014 Oct 16;6(11):a016170
pubmed: 25324214
Science. 2010 Jul 9;329(5988):223-6
pubmed: 20616280
Evodevo. 2020 Jul 1;11:13
pubmed: 32626570
Nat Rev Genet. 2022 Nov;23(11):697-710
pubmed: 35821097
Nat Rev Genet. 2014 Oct;15(10):689-701
pubmed: 25112293
Sci China Life Sci. 2014 Jan;57(1):36-45
pubmed: 24369344
Nat Rev Genet. 2022 Mar;23(3):154-168
pubmed: 34611352
J Mol Biol. 1997 Dec 5;274(3):318-24
pubmed: 9405142
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Aug 15;9:1174
pubmed: 30158945
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Jun 12;10:707
pubmed: 31244865
Genes Dev. 2006 Apr 1;20(7):759-71
pubmed: 16600909
Nature. 2002 Jul 11;418(6894):236-43
pubmed: 12110900
Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Mar;33(3):243-6
pubmed: 25748911
J Cell Physiol. 2007 Feb;210(2):279-89
pubmed: 17096367
Nat Rev Genet. 2013 Dec;14(12):880-93
pubmed: 24217315
Mol Ecol. 2016 Mar;25(6):1213-23
pubmed: 26822195
Front Mol Biosci. 2018 Feb 12;5:12
pubmed: 29484299
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(Database issue):D1178-86
pubmed: 22110026
Integr Comp Biol. 2018 Oct 1;58(4):666-676
pubmed: 29889237
BMC Genomics. 2016 Nov 2;17(1):853
pubmed: 27806710
Trends Ecol Evol. 2022 Apr;37(4):299-308
pubmed: 34920907
Science. 2010 Apr 16;328(5976):351-4
pubmed: 20395508
Nat Rev Genet. 2016 Dec;17(12):744-757
pubmed: 27818507
Nature. 2007 Jun 28;447(7148):1126-9
pubmed: 17538623
Dev Biol. 1983 Apr;96(2):493-506
pubmed: 6832480