Seedling emergence and biomass production of soybean cultivars under wheat-soybean relay cropping.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 18 04 2023
accepted: 09 10 2023
medline: 3 11 2023
pubmed: 1 11 2023
entrez: 1 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Diversification and intensification of cropping systems can ensure farm profitability while reducing negative environmental impacts of agriculture. Wheat-soybean relay cropping (RC), which consists in planting soybean into standing wheat prior to its harvest, may have this potential although it is poorly adopted by French and European farmers. One of the reasons underlying this lack of adoption could be poor emergence rates and biomass production of soybean, due to a severe competition from the already established primary crop for water, light and nutrients during the co-growth or intercrop phase. All these constraints during the early plant growth could finally affect soybean grain yield and thus farm profitability. Here, we performed a laboratory experiment followed by a 2-year field trial (2021-2022) to investigate potential differences among seven soybean cultivars belonging to different maturity groups (from very early to late) in terms of early growth traits viz. seed germination, seedling emergence vigor and final rates, and early biomass production in wheat-soybean RC. A reference soybean variety belonging to late maturity group (cv. ES Pallador) was also sown under conventional cropping system as control treatment (hereafter referred to as CC). Under laboratory conditions, the base water potential for germination ranged from -0.65 to -0.45 MPa with significant differences (p<0.001) among the tested cultivars indicating their differential tolerance to water stress. Under field conditions, seedling emergence vigor, an index explaining the speed of emergence, ranged from 0.23 to 0.41 and from 0.24 to 0.33 while final emergence rates ranged from 69% to 93% and from 65 to 90% in 2021 and 2022, respectively. We found significant effect of cultivar, year and cultivar x year interaction on emergence vigor (p<0.001) and final emergence rates (p<0.01, p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively) of soybean cultivars. Significantly higher emergence vigor of the referent cv. ES Pallador was observed in RC compared to CC cropping system in 2021 (0.40 and 0.34, respectively) but not in 2022 (0.29 and 0.31, respectively). Water stress in the seedbed was higher in RC compared to the CC and was the main cause affecting seed germination and seedling emergence vigor especially in 2022. We found a positive correlation between seedling emergence vigor and seedling final emergence rates indicating that a lower speed of seedling emergence, due to seedbed stress factors, affects final emergence rates of soybean. Post-emergence losses due to pigeons were significantly higher (p<0.001) in CC compared to RC (30% and 2% in 2021, and 29% and 2% in 2022 in CC and RC, respectively). Significantly higher biomass production was observed in CC compared to that in RC both in 2021 (162 vs 33 g/m2 of dry matter; p<0.001) and 2022 (252 vs 60 g/m2 of dry matter; p<0.001). Overall, pre-/post-emergence water stress in the seedbed and post-emergence damage due to pigeons are the most important factors affecting a uniform and robust soybean establishment under RC and CC, respectively under southern French conditions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37910575
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293671
pii: PONE-D-23-11697
pmc: PMC10619765
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0293671

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Lamichhane et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

PLoS One. 2017 Jun 5;12(6):e0178691
pubmed: 28582419
Plant Cell Environ. 2017 May;40(5):765-778
pubmed: 28042879
Plant Physiol. 1983 May;72(1):66-70
pubmed: 16662983
PeerJ. 2021 Mar 31;9:e11106
pubmed: 33850655
J Exp Bot. 2016 Feb;67(3):567-91
pubmed: 26585226
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Mar;24(8):6973-6988
pubmed: 28083744
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 2;116(14):6673-6678
pubmed: 30858318
Glob Chang Biol. 2023 Mar;29(5):1340-1358
pubmed: 36524285

Auteurs

Jay Ram Lamichhane (JR)

INRAE, University of Toulouse, UMR AGIR, Castanet-Tolosan, France.

Carla Varaillas (C)

INRAE, University of Toulouse, UMR AGIR, Castanet-Tolosan, France.

Philippe Debaeke (P)

INRAE, University of Toulouse, UMR AGIR, Castanet-Tolosan, France.

Articles similaires

India Carbon Sequestration Environmental Monitoring Carbon Biomass
Triticum Transcription Factors Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Plant Proteins Salt Stress
Zea mays Triticum China Seasons Crops, Agricultural
Glycine max Photoperiod Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases Flowers Gene Expression Regulation, Plant

Classifications MeSH