Enhancing petunia tissue culture efficiency with machine learning: A pathway to improved callogenesis.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
21
06
2023
accepted:
18
10
2023
medline:
6
11
2023
pubmed:
3
11
2023
entrez:
3
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The important feature of petunia in tissue culture is its unpredictable and genotype-dependent callogenesis, posing challenges for efficient regeneration and biotechnology applications. To address this issue, machine learning (ML) can be considered a powerful tool to analyze callogenesis data, extract key parameters, and predict optimal conditions for petunia callogenesis, facilitating more controlled and productive tissue culture processes. The study aimed to develop a predictive model for callogenesis in petunia using ML algorithms and to optimize the concentrations of phytohormones to enhance callus formation rate (CFR) and callus fresh weight (CFW). The inputs for the model were BAP, KIN, IBA, and NAA, while the outputs were CFR and CFW. Three ML algorithms, namely MLP, RBF, and GRNN, were compared, and the results revealed that GRNN (R2≥83) outperformed MLP and RBF in terms of accuracy. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the relative importance of the four phytohormones. IBA exhibited the highest importance, followed by NAA, BAP, and KIN. Leveraging the superior performance of the GRNN model, a genetic algorithm (GA) was integrated to optimize the concentration of phytohormones for maximizing CFR and CFW. The genetic algorithm identified an optimized combination of phytohormones consisting of 1.31 mg/L BAP, 1.02 mg/L KIN, 1.44 mg/L NAA, and 1.70 mg/L IBA, resulting in 95.83% CFR. To validate the reliability of the predicted results, optimized combinations of phytohormones were tested in a laboratory experiment. The results of the validation experiment indicated no significant difference between the experimental and optimized results obtained through the GA. This study presents a novel approach combining ML, sensitivity analysis, and GA for modeling and predicting callogenesis in petunia. The findings offer valuable insights into the optimization of phytohormone concentrations, facilitating improved callus formation and potential applications in plant tissue culture and genetic engineering.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37922261
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293754
pii: PONE-D-23-19387
pmc: PMC10624318
doi:
Substances chimiques
Plant Growth Regulators
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0293754Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Rezaei et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Nov 22;12:777028
pubmed: 34880894
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Jul 05;10:869
pubmed: 31333705
Plant Methods. 2020 Aug 13;16:112
pubmed: 32817755
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Nov 10;13:1025477
pubmed: 36438083
Biology (Basel). 2023 Mar 13;12(3):
pubmed: 36979133
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 Jul;28(7):3701-3709
pubmed: 34220221
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 2;8(1):9977
pubmed: 29967468
Nat Plants. 2016 May 27;2(6):16074
pubmed: 27255838
Biotechnol Adv. 2023 Sep 1;69:108247
pubmed: 37659744
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022 May;106(9-10):3507-3530
pubmed: 35575915
Molecules. 2021 Apr 03;26(7):
pubmed: 33916717
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Mar 29;7:274
pubmed: 27066013
Plant Methods. 2021 Feb 5;17(1):13
pubmed: 33546685
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 14;15(10):e0240427
pubmed: 33052940
BMC Biotechnol. 2022 Nov 05;22(1):34
pubmed: 36335321
Plant Methods. 2019 Nov 18;15:136
pubmed: 31832078
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 3;9(1):18237
pubmed: 31796784
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Nov 01;8:1853
pubmed: 29163583
PLoS One. 2023 May 11;18(5):e0285657
pubmed: 37167278
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 14;17(2):e0264040
pubmed: 35157736
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 18;15(12):e0243940
pubmed: 33338074
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020 Dec;104(23):10249-10263
pubmed: 33119796
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 May 26;22(11):
pubmed: 34073522
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(14):40206-40217
pubmed: 36607572
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Oct 21;12:757869
pubmed: 34745189
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 30;15(9):e0239901
pubmed: 32997694
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Mar 14;10:282
pubmed: 30923529
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 Jun;105(12):5201-5212
pubmed: 34086118
Protoplasma. 2019 Sep;256(5):1317-1332
pubmed: 31055656
Plant Methods. 2022 Apr 11;18(1):48
pubmed: 35410228
BMC Biotechnol. 2023 Aug 1;23(1):27
pubmed: 37528396
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Sep 27;24(19):
pubmed: 37834075
Biotechnol Adv. 2023 Jan-Feb;62:108074
pubmed: 36481387
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020 Nov;104(22):9449-9485
pubmed: 32984921
Genes (Basel). 2023 Mar 23;14(4):
pubmed: 37107535
Plants (Basel). 2021 Nov 06;10(11):
pubmed: 34834760
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 9;17(9):e0273009
pubmed: 36083887
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 23;12(1):5038
pubmed: 35322147
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 05;8(12):e11969
pubmed: 36544836
Biology (Basel). 2022 May 10;11(5):
pubmed: 35625457
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Oct 19;7:1526
pubmed: 27807436