Arabinose as an overlooked sugar for microbial bioproduction of chemical building blocks.

1,2,3-butanetriol 2,3-butanediol Arabinose arabitol circular biorefineries ethanol lactic acid metabolic engineering xylitol

Journal

Critical reviews in biotechnology
ISSN: 1549-7801
Titre abrégé: Crit Rev Biotechnol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8505177

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Nov 2023
Historique:
medline: 7 11 2023
pubmed: 7 11 2023
entrez: 6 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The circular economy is anticipated to bring a disruptive transformation in manufacturing technologies. Robust and industrial scalable microbial strains that can simultaneously assimilate and valorize multiple carbon substrates are highly desirable, as waste bioresources contain substantial amounts of renewable and fermentable carbon, which is diverse. Lignocellulosic biomass (LCB) is identified as an inexhaustible and alternative resource to reduce global dependence on oil. Glucose, xylose, and arabinose are the major monomeric sugars in LCB. However, primary research has focused on the use of glucose. On the other hand, the valorization of pentose sugars, xylose, and arabinose, has been mainly overlooked, despite possible assimilation by vast microbial communities. The present review highlights the research efforts that have explicitly proven the suitability of arabinose as the starting feedstock for producing various chemical building blocks via biological routes. It begins by analyzing the availability of various arabinose-rich biorenewable sources that can serve as potential feedstocks for biorefineries. The subsequent section outlines the current understanding of arabinose metabolism, biochemical routes prevalent in prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems, and possible products that can be derived from this sugar. Further, currently, exemplar products from arabinose, including arabitol, 2,3-butanediol, 1,2,3-butanetriol, ethanol, lactic acid, and xylitol are discussed, which have been produced by native and non-native microbial strains using metabolic engineering and genome editing tools. The final section deals with the challenges and obstacles associated with arabinose-based production, followed by concluding remarks and prospects.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37932016
doi: 10.1080/07388551.2023.2270702
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-18

Auteurs

Vinod Kumar (V)

School of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK.
Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India.

Deepti Agrawal (D)

Biochemistry and Biotechnology Area, Material Resource Efficiency Division, CSIR-Indian Institute of Petroleum, Dehradun, India.

Rajesh Reddy Bommareddy (RR)

Department of Applied Sciences, Health and Life Sciences, Hub for Biotechnology in the Built Environment, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

M Ahsanul Islam (MA)

Department of Chemical Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.

Samuel Jacob (S)

Department of Biotechnology, School of Bioengineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, India.

Venkatesh Balan (V)

Department of Engineering Technology, Cullen College of Engineering, University of Houston, Sugar Land, TX, USA.

Vijai Singh (V)

Department of Biosciences, School of Sciences, Indrashil University, Rajpur, Mehsana, India.

Vijay Kumar Thakur (VK)

Biorefining and Advanced Materials Research Center, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, UK.

Naveen Kumar Navani (NK)

Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India.

Nigel S Scrutton (NS)

EPSRC/BBSRC Future Biomanufacturing Research Hub, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology and School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Classifications MeSH