Can we achieve better trial recruitment by presenting patient information through multimedia? Meta-analysis of 'studies within a trial' (SWATs).
Information
Meta-analysis
Randomised controlled trial
Recruitment
Research methodology
SWATs
User testing
Journal
BMC medicine
ISSN: 1741-7015
Titre abrégé: BMC Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101190723
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Nov 2023
08 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
12
06
2023
accepted:
14
09
2023
medline:
10
11
2023
pubmed:
9
11
2023
entrez:
8
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
People need high-quality information to make decisions about research participation. Providing information in written format alone is conventional but may not be the most effective and acceptable approach. We developed a structure for the presentation of information using multimedia which included generic and trial-specific content. Our aim was to embed 'Studies Within A Trial' (SWATs) across multiple ongoing trials to test whether multimedia presentation of patient information led to better rates of recruitment. Five trials included a SWAT and randomised their participants to receive a multimedia presentation alongside standard information, or standard written information alone. We collected data on trial recruitment, acceptance and retention and analysed the pooled results using random effects meta-analysis, with the primary outcome defined as the proportion of participants randomised following an invitation to take part. Five SWATs provided data on the primary outcome of proportion of participants randomised. Multimedia alongside written information results in little or no difference in recruitment rates (pooled odds ratio = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.79 to 1.17, p-value = 0.671, I Multimedia alongside written information did not improve trial recruitment rates. ISRCTN71952900, ISRCTN 06710391, ISRCTN 17160087, ISRCTN05926847, ISRCTN62869767.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
People need high-quality information to make decisions about research participation. Providing information in written format alone is conventional but may not be the most effective and acceptable approach. We developed a structure for the presentation of information using multimedia which included generic and trial-specific content. Our aim was to embed 'Studies Within A Trial' (SWATs) across multiple ongoing trials to test whether multimedia presentation of patient information led to better rates of recruitment.
METHODS
METHODS
Five trials included a SWAT and randomised their participants to receive a multimedia presentation alongside standard information, or standard written information alone. We collected data on trial recruitment, acceptance and retention and analysed the pooled results using random effects meta-analysis, with the primary outcome defined as the proportion of participants randomised following an invitation to take part.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Five SWATs provided data on the primary outcome of proportion of participants randomised. Multimedia alongside written information results in little or no difference in recruitment rates (pooled odds ratio = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.79 to 1.17, p-value = 0.671, I
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Multimedia alongside written information did not improve trial recruitment rates.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ISRCTN71952900, ISRCTN 06710391, ISRCTN 17160087, ISRCTN05926847, ISRCTN62869767.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37940944
doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03081-5
pii: 10.1186/s12916-023-03081-5
pmc: PMC10634086
doi:
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
425Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G1002325
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
BMC Med. 2011 Jul 21;9:89
pubmed: 21777435
Trials. 2019 Jul 24;20(1):453
pubmed: 31340853
J Med Ethics. 2009 Sep;35(9):573-8
pubmed: 19717698
BMC Med. 2023 Jul 4;21(1):244
pubmed: 37403173
Arch Dis Child. 2015 Jun;100(6):589-93
pubmed: 25829422
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 09;(5):CD003717
pubmed: 24809816
J Orthod. 2021 Dec;48(4):343-351
pubmed: 34227411
BMJ. 2018 Jun 13;361:k2241
pubmed: 29899047
Br J Cancer. 2007 Sep 17;97(6):705-11
pubmed: 17848908
BMJ Open. 2013 Feb 07;3(2):
pubmed: 23396504
Trials. 2017 Jun 8;18(1):265
pubmed: 28595613
Trials. 2009 Sep 01;10:79
pubmed: 19723335
BMC Med. 2021 Sep 23;19(1):218
pubmed: 34551765
Trials. 2020 Mar 12;21(1):259
pubmed: 32164790
Trials. 2013 Jun 09;14:166
pubmed: 23758961
Lancet. 2018 Dec 15;392(10164):2583-2594
pubmed: 30466866
Trials. 2016 Jan 14;17:27
pubmed: 26767365
Trials. 2022 Aug 17;23(1):672
pubmed: 35978338
N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 1;387(22):2021-2032
pubmed: 36326117
Chirurg. 2002 May;73(5):500-7
pubmed: 12089836
Trials. 2014 Aug 28;15:336
pubmed: 25168762
Br J Dermatol. 2021 May;184(5):828-839
pubmed: 33006767
Trials. 2014 Oct 25;15:407
pubmed: 25344684
Trials. 2020 Jan 7;21(1):33
pubmed: 31910861
Trials. 2006 Apr 07;7:9
pubmed: 16603070
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 22;2:MR000013
pubmed: 29468635