Factor structure of the Oxford Shoulder Score: secondary analyses of the UK FROST and PROFHER trial populations.
Factor structure
Frozen shoulder
Function
Pain
Proximal humeral fracture
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
ISSN: 1749-799X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265112
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Nov 2023
08 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
02
06
2023
accepted:
25
10
2023
medline:
10
11
2023
pubmed:
9
11
2023
entrez:
8
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Frozen shoulder and proximal humeral fracture can cause pain, stiffness and loss of function. The impact of these symptoms on patients can be measured using the comprehensively validated, 12-item Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). Evidence suggests that pain and function may have a differential impact on patients' experience of shoulder conditions, and this may be important for clinical management. We therefore explored the factor structure of the OSS within the UK FROST and PROFHER trial populations. We performed exploratory factor analysis (EFA), followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), on baseline UK FROST data from 490 of the 503 trial participants. Data at 6 months post-randomisation were used for 228 of the 250 participants for the PROFHER trial. UK FROST factor extraction results, using Velicer's Minimum Average Partial and Horn's Parallel Analysis tests, suggested a unifactorial solution, but two factors were weakly indicated by the less reliable 'Kaiser's eigenvalue > 1' and scree tests. We explored this further using EFA. Eight items (2 to 7, 9 and 10) loaded onto a 'Function' factor, three on a 'Pain' factor (1, 8 and 12) and item 11 cross-loaded. However, one- and two-factor models were rejected in CFA. Factor extraction of PROFHER data at 6 months demonstrated a single first-order factor solution, which was also subsequently rejected in CFA. Insufficient evidence was found, within the constraints of the data available, to support the use of 'Pain' and 'Function' sub-scales of the OSS in either patient population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37940977
doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04319-x
pii: 10.1186/s13018-023-04319-x
pmc: PMC10631035
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
846Subventions
Organisme : Health Technology Assessment Programme
ID : 06/404/53 and 13/26/01
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
JAMA. 2015 Mar 10;313(10):1037-47
pubmed: 25756440
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2016 Nov 21;7:195-203
pubmed: 27920590
Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Oct 15;47(5):513-9
pubmed: 12382300
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Mar;64(3):407-14
pubmed: 22162357
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Apr;470(4):1133-43
pubmed: 22090356
Skeletal Radiol. 2019 Aug;48(8):1171-1184
pubmed: 30607455
Behav Res Methods. 2006 Feb;38(1):88-91
pubmed: 16817517
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008 Sep;44(3):315-28
pubmed: 18762741
Psychometrika. 1965 Jun;30:179-85
pubmed: 14306381
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 Apr 11;46(2):340-64
pubmed: 26741331
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 May;90(4):326-31
pubmed: 18492399
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76
pubmed: 26828106
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;17(2):231-6
pubmed: 17993282
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Apr;28(3):363-371
pubmed: 29094212
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Jul;78(4):593-600
pubmed: 8682827
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Jan;129(1):119-23
pubmed: 18183410
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 Aug;83(6):877-82
pubmed: 11521933
Psychol Methods. 2004 Dec;9(4):466-91
pubmed: 15598100
Qual Life Res. 2013 Nov;22(9):2561-8
pubmed: 23526094
Lancet. 2020 Oct 3;396(10256):977-989
pubmed: 33010843