Progressive Transition From Supervised to Unsupervised Robot-Assisted Therapy After Stroke: Protocol for a Single-Group, Interventional Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND

Increasing the dose of therapy delivered to patients with stroke may improve functional outcomes and quality of life. Unsupervised technology-assisted rehabilitation is a promising way to increase the dose of therapy without dramatically increasing the burden on the health care system. Despite the many existing technologies for unsupervised rehabilitation, active rehabilitation robots have rarely been tested in a fully unsupervised way. Furthermore, the outcomes of unsupervised technology-assisted therapy (eg, feasibility, acceptance, and increase in therapy dose) vary widely. This might be due to the use of different technologies as well as to the broad range of methods applied to teach the patients how to independently train with a technology.

OBJECTIVE

This paper describes the study design of a clinical study investigating the feasibility of unsupervised therapy with an active robot and of a systematic approach for the progressive transition from supervised to unsupervised use of a rehabilitation technology in a clinical setting. The effect of unsupervised therapy on achievable therapy dose, user experience in this therapy setting, and the usability of the rehabilitation technology are also evaluated.

METHODS

Participants of the clinical study are inpatients of a rehabilitation clinic with subacute stroke undergoing a 4-week intervention where they train with a hand rehabilitation robot. The first week of the intervention is supervised by a therapist, who teaches participants how to interact and train with the device. The second week consists of minimally supervised therapy, where the therapist is present but intervenes only if needed as participants exercise with the device. If the participants properly learn how to train with the device, they proceed to the unsupervised phase and train without any supervision during the third and fourth weeks. Throughout the duration of the study, data on feasibility and therapy dose (ie, duration and repetitions) are collected. Usability and user experience are evaluated at the end of the second (ie, minimally supervised) and fourth (ie, unsupervised) weeks, allowing us to investigate the effect of therapist absence.

RESULTS

As of April 2023, 13 patients were recruited and completed the protocol, with no reported adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will inform on the feasibility of fully unsupervised rehabilitation with an active rehabilitation robot in a clinical setting and its effect on therapy dose. Furthermore, if successful, the proposed systematic approach for a progressive transition from supervised to unsupervised technology-assisted rehabilitation could serve as a benchmark to allow for easier comparisons between different technologies. This approach could also be extended to the application of such technologies in the home environment, as the supervised and minimally supervised sessions could be performed in the clinic, followed by unsupervised therapy at home after discharge.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04388891; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04388891.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/48485.

Informations de copyright

©Giada Devittori, Raffaele Ranzani, Daria Dinacci, Davide Romiti, Antonella Califfi, Claudio Petrillo, Paolo Rossi, Roger Gassert, Olivier Lambercy. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 09.11.2023.