Generically partisan: Polarization in political communication.
American politics
generic language
political communication
political polarization
psychological research
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Nov 2023
21 Nov 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
13
05
2024
medline:
15
11
2023
pubmed:
13
11
2023
entrez:
13
11
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
American political parties continue to grow more polarized, but the extent of ideological polarization among the public is much less than the extent of perceived polarization (what the ideological gap is believed to be). Perceived polarization is concerning because of its link to interparty hostility, but it remains unclear what drives this phenomenon. We propose that a tendency for individuals to form broad generalizations about groups on the basis of inconsistent evidence may be partly responsible. We study this tendency by measuring the interpretation, endorsement, and recall of category-referring statements, also known as generics (e.g., "Democrats favor affirmative action"). In study 1 (
Identifiants
pubmed: 37956300
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2309361120
pmc: PMC10666007
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2309361120Références
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;10(2):145-58
pubmed: 25910386
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Feb;4(2):66-72
pubmed: 10652524
Psychol Rev. 2019 Apr;126(3):395-436
pubmed: 30762385
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 May;146(5):607-614
pubmed: 28459260
Science. 2018 Jun 1;360(6392):1020-1024
pubmed: 29853686
Lang Cogn Process. 2009 May;24(4):481-505
pubmed: 25620828
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Apr;49(2):433-442
pubmed: 27071389
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 30;117(26):14864-14872
pubmed: 32527858
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Jun;158:19-31
pubmed: 28167383
J Child Lang. 2016 Nov;43(6):1231-44
pubmed: 26333824
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Oct;99(4):611-21
pubmed: 20731500
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Nov 21;120(47):e2309361120
pubmed: 37956300
Child Dev. 2021 Jul;92(4):e531-e547
pubmed: 33511701
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Feb 26;116(9):3476-3481
pubmed: 30808741
Cogn Sci. 2015 Jul;39(5):1021-46
pubmed: 25327964
Psychol Sci. 2021 Feb;32(2):189-203
pubmed: 33450169
Cogn Psychol. 2021 Sep;129:101408
pubmed: 34330016
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):7900-7907
pubmed: 28739931
Psychol Rev. 2020 Jan;127(1):47-73
pubmed: 31580105
Cogn Psychol. 2010 Nov;61(3):273-301
pubmed: 20638053
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Sep 10;116(37):18370-18377
pubmed: 31451665
Cogn Psychol. 2012 May;64(3):186-214
pubmed: 22225996
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Apr 19;119(16):e2116851119
pubmed: 35412915
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31
pubmed: 17835457
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Aug 21;109(34):13526-31
pubmed: 22869722
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 03;11:1274
pubmed: 32719631
Cognition. 2009 Oct;113(1):14-25
pubmed: 19674739
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Nov;47(11):1836-1855
pubmed: 34843339
Cogn Sci. 2010 Nov 1;34(8):1452-1482
pubmed: 21116475
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 04;10(11):e0140806
pubmed: 26536592