Need for cognition moderates the relief of avoiding cognitive effort.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
28
06
2023
accepted:
31
10
2023
medline:
27
11
2023
pubmed:
17
11
2023
entrez:
16
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
When making decisions, humans aim to maximize rewards while minimizing costs. The exertion of mental or physical effort has been proposed to be one those costs, translating into avoidance of behaviors carrying effort demands. This motivational framework also predicts that people should experience positive affect when anticipating demand that is subsequently avoided (i.e., a "relief effect"), but evidence for this prediction is scarce. Here, we follow up on a previous study [1] that provided some initial evidence that people more positively evaluated outcomes if it meant they could avoid performing an additional demanding task. However, the results from this study did not provide conclusive evidence that this effect was driven by effort avoidance. Here, we report two experiments that are able to do this. Participants performed a gambling task, and if they did not receive reward they would have to perform an orthogonal effort task. Prior to the gamble, a cue indicated whether this effort task would be easy or hard. We probed hedonic responses to the reward-related feedback, as well as after the subsequent effort task feedback. Participants reported lower hedonic responses for no-reward outcomes when high vs. low effort was anticipated (and later exerted). They also reported higher hedonic responses for reward outcomes when high vs. low effort was anticipated (and avoided). Importantly, this relief effect was smaller in participants with high need for cognition. These results suggest that avoidance of high effort tasks is rewarding, but that the size off this effect depends on the individual disposition to engage with and expend cognitive effort. They also raise the important question of whether this disposition alters the cost of effort per se, or rather offset this cost during cost-benefit analyses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37972115
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287954
pii: PONE-D-23-18706
pmc: PMC10653461
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0287954Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Gheza et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Neuroimage. 2015 Oct 15;120:104-13
pubmed: 26163803
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Dec;36(6):661-79
pubmed: 24304775
Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215
pubmed: 847061
Neuroimage. 2018 Jun;173:153-164
pubmed: 29496610
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Jun;19(3):619-636
pubmed: 30607834
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Oct;29(10):1633-1645
pubmed: 28654358
Science. 2020 Mar 20;367(6484):1362-1366
pubmed: 32193325
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Apr;12(2):335-9
pubmed: 16082815
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 27;107(17):7922-6
pubmed: 20385798
Neuron. 2012 Nov 8;76(3):470-85
pubmed: 23141060
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Jan 15;46(1):241-8
pubmed: 17804025
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Dec;36(6):697-8; discussion 707-26
pubmed: 24304795
Psychol Methods. 2017 Jun;22(2):304-321
pubmed: 27280448
Neuron. 2016 Feb 17;89(4):695-710
pubmed: 26889810
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Jan;126(1):19-31
pubmed: 27935729
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jul 25;40:99-124
pubmed: 28375769
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Mar 15;261:1-7
pubmed: 24308956
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Feb 4;123:106-115
pubmed: 29705065
Neuron. 2013 Jul 24;79(2):217-40
pubmed: 23889930
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Aug;23(4):1129-1140
pubmed: 37059875
Elife. 2020 Nov 17;9:
pubmed: 33200988
Cereb Cortex. 2022 Sep 19;32(19):4255-4270
pubmed: 35169838
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Nov;139(4):665-82
pubmed: 20853993
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 07;9(3):e91008
pubmed: 24608867
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Feb;146:63-6
pubmed: 24384400
Psychol Sci. 2021 Sep;32(9):1463-1475
pubmed: 34464216
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:393-423
pubmed: 24471371
Psychophysiology. 2007 Nov;44(6):905-12
pubmed: 17666029
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 15;8(1):12228
pubmed: 30111849
Psychol Rev. 2023 Jul;130(4):1081-1103
pubmed: 35679204
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:83-113
pubmed: 25251491
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Nov;23(11):3419-32
pubmed: 21452938
Pain. 2017 Apr;158 Suppl 1:S43-S49
pubmed: 28106670
Psychophysiology. 2015 Apr;52(4):449-59
pubmed: 25327938
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 22;8(7):e68210
pubmed: 23894295
Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;28(9):1321-1333
pubmed: 28731839
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Feb 1;119(5):
pubmed: 35101919
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;22(4):337-349
pubmed: 29477776
Neuroimage. 2015 Nov 15;122:73-9
pubmed: 26254588
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Dec;2(12):899-908
pubmed: 30988433
PLoS One. 2009 Aug 12;4(8):e6598
pubmed: 19672310
J Pers. 2021 Dec;89(6):1113-1125
pubmed: 33866562
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Aug 24;:
pubmed: 37616076
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2009 Mar;9(1):16-27
pubmed: 19246324
PLoS One. 2011 Apr 07;6(4):e17870
pubmed: 21490964
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167-202
pubmed: 11283309
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Jun;64(6):987-99
pubmed: 8326474
Psychophysiology. 2005 Mar;42(2):161-70
pubmed: 15787853
Int J Psychophysiol. 2018 Oct;132(Pt B):213-225
pubmed: 29179993
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Feb;133:104493
pubmed: 34910931
Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 1;35(2):968-78
pubmed: 17257860
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000 Jan;25(1):54-67
pubmed: 10620381
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Feb 4;123:41-54
pubmed: 29944865
Neuroimage. 2015 Oct 1;119:13-9
pubmed: 26070260