Evaluation of the Effects of Digital Manufacturing, Preparation Taper, Cement Type, and Aging on the Color Stability of Anterior Provisional Crowns Using Colorimetry.
Journal
Medical science monitor basic research
ISSN: 2325-4416
Titre abrégé: Med Sci Monit Basic Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101597444
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Nov 2023
20 Nov 2023
Historique:
medline:
27
11
2023
pubmed:
21
11
2023
entrez:
21
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
BACKGROUND Replicating the 3-dimensional (3D) color of natural teeth in artificial substitutes is challenging. Fixed dental prosthodontics require aesthetic, color-stable provisional restorations. Recent milling and 3D printing digital manufacturing techniques offer improved outcomes. This study assesses color stability in various digital manufacturing methods, tapers, and aging effects on anterior provisional resin restorations. MATERIAL AND METHODS Two all-ceramic tooth preparations on typodont teeth with 10° and 20° tapers were converted into experimental dies. Forty temporary crowns were manufactured using 3D printing and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (milling). Within these 2 groups, 10 crowns were cemented using a regular and clear provisional cement. All samples were thermocycled to simulate clinical use of 6 months. Color difference formula (CIEDE2000) indicated changes between before and after cementation (ΔE00) and between after cementation and after thermocycling (ΔE00[II]). The color change was considered significant in terms of clinically perceptible (ΔE00 ≤0.62) and acceptable (ΔE00 ≤2.62) changes. One-way ANOVA (P value of less than 0.05) calculated overall differences, which were established using a Fisher post hoc test. RESULTS Crowns cemented with clear cement showed fewer color changes irrespective of the manufacturing technique or taper. Notably, only the 10° 3D-printed crown with clear cement had an imperceptible color change at the pre-/post-cementation phase. Meanwhile, the 10° and 20° milled crowns with regular cement exhibited unacceptable color changes after thermocycling. CONCLUSIONS For long‑term temporization in the aesthetic zone, properly optimized 3D-printed provisional restorations cemented with clear cement had better color stability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37987528
pii: 941919
doi: 10.12659/MSMBR.941919
pmc: PMC10668520
doi:
Substances chimiques
Glass Ionomer Cements
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e941919Références
Med Sci Monit. 2023 Jun 30;29:e940949
pubmed: 37386761
Dent Clin North Am. 1993 Apr;37(2):163-79
pubmed: 8477863
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 28;13(2):e0193162
pubmed: 29489883
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 May;91(5):447-52
pubmed: 15153852
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Jan;31(1):51-57
pubmed: 30367716
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Dec;20(9):2501-2506
pubmed: 26921152
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Mar 24;:
pubmed: 35341600
J Prosthodont. 2021 Jun;30(5):430-439
pubmed: 32864812
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;27 Suppl 1:S1-9
pubmed: 25886208
J Am Dent Assoc. 2023 Jun;154(6):461-470
pubmed: 37115140
J Oral Sci. 2019 Aug 28;61(3):447-453
pubmed: 31341123
Eur J Dent. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):330-334
pubmed: 28932142
J Oral Rehabil. 2000 Jun;27(6):488-93
pubmed: 10888276
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003 Jun;31(3):161-8
pubmed: 12752541
Dent Mater. 2011 Apr;27(4):339-47
pubmed: 21176946
Dent Mater. 2020 Oct;36(10):1332-1342
pubmed: 32736851
J Adv Prosthodont. 2021 Jun;13(3):160-171
pubmed: 34234926
J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Apr;83(4):412-7
pubmed: 10756290
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Jan;22(1):62-9
pubmed: 21158931
Int J Prosthodont. 1999 Mar-Apr;12(2):135-9
pubmed: 10371915
Materials (Basel). 2021 Oct 03;14(19):
pubmed: 34640178
J Prosthodont Res. 2022 Jul 30;66(3):502-508
pubmed: 34853238
Braz Oral Res. 2010 Jan-Mar;24(1):114-9
pubmed: 20339724
J Adv Prosthodont. 2020 Aug;12(4):218-224
pubmed: 32879712
Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 Nov;71(6):1570-8
pubmed: 23627846
J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):e491-e495
pubmed: 29377319
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Nov;114(5):702-8
pubmed: 26277020
Electron Physician. 2017 Jul 25;9(7):4766-4772
pubmed: 28894533
J Biomed Opt. 2015 Apr;20(4):045002
pubmed: 25875626
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Feb 1;18(2):112-116
pubmed: 28174363
Dent Mater. 2009 Jul;25(7):917-28
pubmed: 19249090
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Mar;109(3):179-86
pubmed: 23522367
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Feb;121(2):347-352
pubmed: 30143239
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jun;123(6):880-887
pubmed: 31703924
Int J Comput Dent. 2018;21(1):31-40
pubmed: 29610779
J Prosthodont. 2017 Feb;26(2):136-140
pubmed: 26426204
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Aug;126(2):248-253
pubmed: 32829886
Dent Mater. 2021 Jun;37(6):e360-e374
pubmed: 33663884
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Sep;114(3):414-9
pubmed: 26001490
J Dent (Shiraz). 2022 Dec;23(4):424-437
pubmed: 36718160
J Dent. 2021 Nov;114:103785
pubmed: 34419480
J Dent. 2010;38 Suppl 2:e57-64
pubmed: 20670670
Int J Dent. 2011;2011:134659
pubmed: 22013441
J Prosthodont. 2022 Dec;31(9):784-790
pubmed: 35061921
J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Apr;81(4):469-75
pubmed: 10095219
J Prosthodont. 2023 Jan;32(1):40-48
pubmed: 35119168
Odontology. 2021 Jan;109(1):76-81
pubmed: 32537671
J Appl Oral Sci. 2016 May-Jun;24(3):258-63
pubmed: 27383707
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
Materials (Basel). 2020 Nov 26;13(23):
pubmed: 33255922
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Apr;7(Suppl 1):S282-4
pubmed: 26015733
Dent Mater. 2018 Feb;34(2):192-200
pubmed: 29110921
Dent Mater. 2006 Mar;22(3):211-22
pubmed: 16087225
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 18;17(1):e0262582
pubmed: 35041706
J Adv Prosthodont. 2020 Oct;12(5):259-264
pubmed: 33149846
Dent Mater. 2018 Aug;34(8):1168-1174
pubmed: 29764698
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Dec;124(6):780-786
pubmed: 31955837