Data-driven Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Human Head Models.
Gaussian process regression
Grassmannian diffusion maps
Head injury model
Surrogate model
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
Uncertainty quantification
Journal
Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering
ISSN: 0045-7825
Titre abrégé: Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101511523
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2022
01 Aug 2022
Historique:
medline:
1
8
2022
pubmed:
1
8
2022
entrez:
23
11
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Computational models of the human head are promising tools for estimating the impact-induced response of the brain, and thus play an important role in the prediction of traumatic brain injury. The basic constituents of these models (i.e., model geometry, material properties, and boundary conditions) are often associated with significant uncertainty and variability. As a result, uncertainty quantification (UQ), which involves quantification of the effect of this uncertainty and variability on the simulated response, becomes critical to ensure reliability of model predictions. Modern biofidelic head model simulations are associated with very high computational cost and high-dimensional inputs and outputs, which limits the applicability of traditional UQ methods on these systems. In this study, a two-stage, data-driven manifold learning-based framework is proposed for UQ of computational head models. This framework is demonstrated on a 2D subject-specific head model, where the goal is to quantify uncertainty in the simulated strain fields (i.e., output), given variability in the material properties of different brain substructures (i.e., input). In the first stage, a data-driven method based on multi-dimensional Gaussian kernel-density estimation and diffusion maps is used to generate realizations of the input random vector directly from the available data. Computational simulations of a small number of realizations provide input-output pairs for training data-driven surrogate models in the second stage. The surrogate models employ nonlinear dimensionality reduction using Grassmannian diffusion maps, Gaussian process regression to create a low-cost mapping between the input random vector and the reduced solution space, and geometric harmonics models for mapping between the reduced space and the Grassmann manifold. It is demonstrated that the surrogate models provide highly accurate approximations of the computational model while significantly reducing the computational cost. Monte Carlo simulations of the surrogate models are used for uncertainty propagation. UQ of the strain fields highlights significant spatial variation in model uncertainty, and reveals key differences in uncertainty among commonly used strain-based brain injury predictor variables.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37994358
doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2022.115108
pmc: PMC10664838
mid: NIHMS1895486
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : U01 NS112120
Pays : United States
Références
Brain Multiphys. 2020 Nov;1:
pubmed: 33870238
J Biomech Eng. 2002 Apr;124(2):244-52
pubmed: 12002135
Stapp Car Crash J. 2014 Nov;58:29-61
pubmed: 26192949
Pituitary. 2019 Jun;22(3):270-282
pubmed: 30929221
Brain Multiphys. 2021;2:
pubmed: 37168236
Neuroimage. 2013 Oct 1;79:145-52
pubmed: 23644001
Prog Neurobiol. 2002 Jul;67(4):281-344
pubmed: 12207973
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Dec 15;41(18):5282-5300
pubmed: 32931076
J Biomech Eng. 2013 Nov;135(11):111002
pubmed: 24065136
Ann Biomed Eng. 2021 Oct;49(10):2677-2692
pubmed: 34212235
J Biomech. 1970 Mar;3(2):211-21
pubmed: 5521539
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Mar;53(3):649-57
pubmed: 15723403
Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2019;21(1):141-152
pubmed: 31197278
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Dec;37(12):4221-4233
pubmed: 27401228
Neurobiol Aging. 2018 May;65:158-167
pubmed: 29494862
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Jun-Jul;28(6):1119-25
pubmed: 17569971
J Biomech. 2013 Nov 15;46(16):2795-801
pubmed: 24112782
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2017 Oct;16(5):1709-1727
pubmed: 28500358
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 May;33:24-42
pubmed: 24063789
J Neurotrauma. 2015 Apr 1;32(7):441-54
pubmed: 24735430
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Dec 21;61(24):R401-R437
pubmed: 27845941
J Neurotrauma. 2017 Jul 1;34(13):2154-2166
pubmed: 28394205
Stapp Car Crash J. 2013 Nov;57:243-66
pubmed: 24435734
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Apr;80:222-234
pubmed: 29453025
Stapp Car Crash J. 2007 Oct;51:81-114
pubmed: 18278592
J Biomech. 2020 Jan 2;98:109380
pubmed: 31630775
Neuroimage. 2021 May 15;232:117889
pubmed: 33617995
J Neurotrauma. 2013 Jan 15;30(2):102-18
pubmed: 22992118
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2018 Sep;34(9):e3109
pubmed: 29804323
Ann Biomed Eng. 2018 Jul;46(7):972-985
pubmed: 29594689
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jul;92:53-70
pubmed: 27038501
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 May;33:43-54
pubmed: 23127641
Ann Biomed Eng. 2019 Sep;47(9):1923-1940
pubmed: 30767132