Assessor discomfort and failure to fail in clinical performance assessments.
Clinical supervisor
Failure to fail
Feedback
In-training assessment
Judgement
Workplace assessment
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Nov 2023
27 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
31
03
2023
accepted:
14
09
2023
medline:
29
11
2023
pubmed:
28
11
2023
entrez:
28
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Assessment of trainee performance in the workplace is critical to ensuring high standards of clinical care. However, some supervisors find the task to be challenging, and may feel unable to deliver their true judgement on a trainee's performance. They may 'keep MUM' (that is, keep mum about undesirable messages) and fail to fail an underperforming trainee. In this study, we explore the effect of discomfort on assessors. Using a survey method, supervisors of trainees in the Australasian College of Dermatologists were asked to self-report experiences of discomfort in various aspects of trainee workplace assessment and for their engagement in MUM behaviours including failure to fail. Sixty-one responses were received from 135 eligible assessors. 12.5% of assessors self-reported they had failed to fail a trainee and 18% admitted they had grade inflated a trainee's score on a clinical performance assessment in the previous 12-month period. Assessors who reported higher levels of discomfort in the clinical performance assessment context were significantly more likely to report previously failing to fail a trainee. The study did not reveal significant associations with assessor demographics and self-reports of discomfort or MUM behaviours. This study reveals the impact of assessor discomfort on the accuracy of assessment information and feedback to trainees, including as a contributing factor to the failure to fail phenomenon. Addressing assessor experience of discomfort offers one opportunity to impact on the complex and multifactorial issue that failure to fail represents.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Assessment of trainee performance in the workplace is critical to ensuring high standards of clinical care. However, some supervisors find the task to be challenging, and may feel unable to deliver their true judgement on a trainee's performance. They may 'keep MUM' (that is, keep mum about undesirable messages) and fail to fail an underperforming trainee. In this study, we explore the effect of discomfort on assessors.
METHODS
METHODS
Using a survey method, supervisors of trainees in the Australasian College of Dermatologists were asked to self-report experiences of discomfort in various aspects of trainee workplace assessment and for their engagement in MUM behaviours including failure to fail.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Sixty-one responses were received from 135 eligible assessors. 12.5% of assessors self-reported they had failed to fail a trainee and 18% admitted they had grade inflated a trainee's score on a clinical performance assessment in the previous 12-month period. Assessors who reported higher levels of discomfort in the clinical performance assessment context were significantly more likely to report previously failing to fail a trainee. The study did not reveal significant associations with assessor demographics and self-reports of discomfort or MUM behaviours.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study reveals the impact of assessor discomfort on the accuracy of assessment information and feedback to trainees, including as a contributing factor to the failure to fail phenomenon. Addressing assessor experience of discomfort offers one opportunity to impact on the complex and multifactorial issue that failure to fail represents.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38012637
doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04688-1
pii: 10.1186/s12909-023-04688-1
pmc: PMC10680261
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
901Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Acad Med. 2005 Oct;80(10 Suppl):S84-7
pubmed: 16199466
Med Educ. 2019 Jan;53(1):76-85
pubmed: 30073692
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104666
pubmed: 33221050
Med Educ. 2008 Aug;42(8):800-9
pubmed: 18715477
Can J Anaesth. 2021 Jul;68(7):1000-1007
pubmed: 33721201
Med Teach. 2016 Nov;38(11):1092-1099
pubmed: 27602533
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2019 Jul;47(4):349-356
pubmed: 31294632
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023 May;28(2):369-385
pubmed: 35997910
Med Teach. 2013 Jun;35(6):e1197-210
pubmed: 23676179
Teach Learn Med. 2003 Fall;15(4):270-92
pubmed: 14612262
Teach Learn Med. 2007 Fall;19(4):343-6
pubmed: 17935462
Teach Learn Med. 2000 Summer;12(3):112-6
pubmed: 11228897
Med Educ. 2019 Feb;53(2):133-142
pubmed: 30328138
Australas J Dermatol. 2018 Feb;59(1):e15-e22
pubmed: 27995625
Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Mar;36:64-70
pubmed: 30875605
Teach Learn Med. 2013;25(1):71-6
pubmed: 23330898
Australas J Dermatol. 2016 May;57(2):128-34
pubmed: 26172219
Acad Med. 1996 Jan;71(1 Suppl):S55-63
pubmed: 8546784