Potential of whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to predict muscle size of psoas major, gluteus maximus and back muscles.
Back muscles
Cross-sectional areas
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
Gluteus Maximus
Psoas major
Trunk muscle mass
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Nov 2023
27 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
15
01
2023
accepted:
21
11
2023
medline:
29
11
2023
pubmed:
28
11
2023
entrez:
28
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Measurement of trunk muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) using axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered clinically meaningful for understanding several spinal pathologies, such as low back pain and spinal sagittal imbalance. However, it remains unclear whether trunk muscle mass (TMM) measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can predict the trunk muscle CSA. The aim of this study is to determine if DXA-derived TMM is associated and predicts with CSA of paraspinal muscles and gluteus maximus measured using MRI in healthy volunteers. A total of 48 healthy volunteers underwent whole-body DXA and MRI of the spinopelvic region. The CSA of the psoas major, back muscles, and gluteus maximus were measured on axial MRI. Correlations and linear regressions between the TMM measured using DXA and the CSA of each musculature were investigated. There was a weak correlation between TMM and CSA of the psoas major in men (r = 0.39, P = 0.0678), and the linear regression was y = 301.74x - 401.24 (R The DXA-derived TMM was able to predict the CSA of the psoas major, back muscles, and gluteus maximus, and significantly correlated with the CSA of the back muscles and gluteus maximus. It might be a safer and cheaper alternative for evaluating the size of the back muscles and gluteus maximus.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Measurement of trunk muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) using axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered clinically meaningful for understanding several spinal pathologies, such as low back pain and spinal sagittal imbalance. However, it remains unclear whether trunk muscle mass (TMM) measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can predict the trunk muscle CSA. The aim of this study is to determine if DXA-derived TMM is associated and predicts with CSA of paraspinal muscles and gluteus maximus measured using MRI in healthy volunteers.
METHODS
METHODS
A total of 48 healthy volunteers underwent whole-body DXA and MRI of the spinopelvic region. The CSA of the psoas major, back muscles, and gluteus maximus were measured on axial MRI. Correlations and linear regressions between the TMM measured using DXA and the CSA of each musculature were investigated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
There was a weak correlation between TMM and CSA of the psoas major in men (r = 0.39, P = 0.0678), and the linear regression was y = 301.74x - 401.24 (R
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The DXA-derived TMM was able to predict the CSA of the psoas major, back muscles, and gluteus maximus, and significantly correlated with the CSA of the back muscles and gluteus maximus. It might be a safer and cheaper alternative for evaluating the size of the back muscles and gluteus maximus.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38012671
doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07051-z
pii: 10.1186/s12891-023-07051-z
pmc: PMC10680309
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
917Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Am J Clin Nutr. 1989 Jun;49(6):1283-9
pubmed: 2729167
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Jun 1;18(7):830-6
pubmed: 8316880
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1997 Sep;29(3):187-91
pubmed: 9271154
J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 Jul;42(4):508-516
pubmed: 29461936
Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Aug;76(2):378-83
pubmed: 12145010
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2019 Feb 28;3(4):335-341
pubmed: 31768453
Br J Rheumatol. 1992 Jun;31(6):389-94
pubmed: 1534505
Spine J. 2019 May;19(5):862-868
pubmed: 30529786
Spine J. 2016 Apr;16(4):451-8
pubmed: 26165478
Orthop Clin North Am. 1975 Jan;6(1):135-44
pubmed: 123048
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3115-24
pubmed: 11124727
Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Dec;29(10):441-447
pubmed: 27879506
J Spinal Disord. 1992 Dec;5(4):448-58
pubmed: 1490043
J Anat. 1965 Jan;99:13-26
pubmed: 14245340
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Apr;32(4):617-624
pubmed: 31376118
Spine J. 2015 Jul 01;15(7):1593-601
pubmed: 25828477
J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 Sep;42(5):622-630
pubmed: 30707654
J Spinal Disord. 1993 Apr;6(2):114-23
pubmed: 8504222
Mech Ageing Dev. 1999 Mar 1;107(2):123-36
pubmed: 10220041
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010 Nov;18(11):2227-33
pubmed: 20111013
Clin Nutr. 2004 Oct;23(5):1226-43
pubmed: 15380917
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Apr;22(4):751-759.e2
pubmed: 32768372
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2013 Sep;13(3):320-8
pubmed: 23989253
Eur Spine J. 2000 Aug;9(4):266-72
pubmed: 11261613
Eur Spine J. 2020 Dec;29(12):2998-3005
pubmed: 32529524
Am J Clin Nutr. 1990 Jun;51(6):1106-12
pubmed: 2349926
Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2014 Sep;11(3):181-4
pubmed: 25568650
Pain Pract. 2011 Jan-Feb;11(1):57-69
pubmed: 20602714
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2008 Sep;11(5):566-72
pubmed: 18685451