Contrasting terrestrial and marine ecospace dynamics after the end-Triassic mass extinction event.
Triassic–Jurassic
ecospace
functional ecology
mass extinction
palaeoecology
Journal
Proceedings. Biological sciences
ISSN: 1471-2954
Titre abrégé: Proc Biol Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245157
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Dec 2023
06 Dec 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
06
12
2024
medline:
7
12
2023
pubmed:
6
12
2023
entrez:
5
12
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mass extinctions have fundamentally altered the structure of the biosphere throughout Earth's history. The ecological severity of mass extinctions is well studied in marine ecosystems by categorizing marine taxa into functional groups based on 'ecospace' approaches, but the ecological response of terrestrial ecosystems to mass extinctions is less well understood due to the lack of a comparable methodology. Here, we present a new terrestrial ecospace framework that categorizes fauna into functional groups as defined by tiering, motility and feeding traits. We applied the new terrestrial and traditional marine ecospace analyses to data from the Paleobiology Database across the end-Triassic mass extinction-a time of catastrophic global warming-to compare changes between the marine and terrestrial biospheres. We found that terrestrial functional groups experienced higher extinction severity, that taxonomic and functional richness are more tightly coupled in the terrestrial, and that the terrestrial realm continued to experience high ecological dissimilarity in the wake of the extinction. Although signals of extinction severity and ecological turnover are sensitive to the quality of the terrestrial fossil record, our findings suggest greater ecological pressure from the end-Triassic mass extinction on terrestrial ecosystems than marine ecosystems, contributing to more prolonged terrestrial ecological flux.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38052241
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2232
pmc: PMC10697803
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20232232Références
Sci Adv. 2022 Jul;8(26):eabo0597
pubmed: 35767613
Science. 2002 May 17;296(5571):1305-7
pubmed: 12016313
Science. 1982 Mar 19;215(4539):1501-3
pubmed: 17788674
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Dec 6;290(2012):20232232
pubmed: 38052241
Sci Adv. 2020 Apr 17;6(16):eaay7650
pubmed: 32494601
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Jun 7;279(1736):2180-7
pubmed: 22298850
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 9;112(23):7207-12
pubmed: 25941366
Sci Adv. 2021 May 5;7(19):
pubmed: 33952521
Conserv Biol. 2022 Jun;36(3):e13852
pubmed: 34668599
Science. 2013 May 24;340(6135):941-5
pubmed: 23519213
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 17;108(20):8339-44
pubmed: 21536898
Biol Lett. 2019 Mar 29;15(3):20180902
pubmed: 30862310
Nat Commun. 2021 Aug 4;12(1):4694
pubmed: 34349121
Science. 2011 Mar 18;331(6023):1404-9
pubmed: 21330490
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 31;108(22):8972-7
pubmed: 21571639
Sci Adv. 2018 Oct 10;4(10):eaat5091
pubmed: 30324133
Nat Commun. 2021 May 14;12(1):2796
pubmed: 33990610
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 14;116(20):9931-9940
pubmed: 31036651
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 18;6:19208
pubmed: 26778170
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Aug;1(8):1100-1106
pubmed: 29046566
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 8;98(10):5399-403
pubmed: 11344285
Sci Adv. 2020 Sep 9;6(37):
pubmed: 32917684
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Sep 11;280(1770):20131940
pubmed: 24026826
Curr Biol. 2015 Oct 5;25(19):R941-52
pubmed: 26439357