The impact of the size and angle of the cochlear basal turn on translocation of a pre-curved mid-scala cochlear implant electrode.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 01 2024
Historique:
received: 05 06 2023
accepted: 09 11 2023
medline: 12 1 2024
pubmed: 11 1 2024
entrez: 10 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Scalar translocation is a severe form of intra-cochlear trauma during cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion. This study explored the hypothesis that the dimensions of the cochlear basal turn and orientation of its inferior segment relative to surgically relevant anatomical structures influence the scalar translocation rates of a pre-curved CI electrode. In a cohort of 40 patients implanted with the Advanced Bionics Mid-Scala electrode array, the scalar translocation group (40%) had a significantly smaller mean distance A of the cochlear basal turn (p < 0.001) and wider horizontal angle between the inferior segment of the cochlear basal turn and the mastoid facial nerve (p = 0.040). A logistic regression model incorporating distance A (p = 0.003) and horizontal facial nerve angle (p = 0.017) explained 44.0-59.9% of the variance in scalar translocation and correctly classified 82.5% of cases. Every 1mm decrease in distance A was associated with a 99.2% increase in odds of translocation [95% confidence interval 80.3%, 100%], whilst every 1-degree increase in the horizontal facial nerve angle was associated with an 18.1% increase in odds of translocation [95% CI 3.0%, 35.5%]. The study findings provide an evidence-based argument for the development of a navigation system for optimal angulation of electrode insertion during CI surgery to reduce intra-cochlear trauma.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38200135
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47133-5
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-47133-5
pmc: PMC10781700
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1024

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Apr 13;11(4):e27207
pubmed: 35416780
Hear Res. 2016 Sep;339:132-41
pubmed: 27371868
Ear Hear. 2013 May-Jun;34(3):342-60
pubmed: 23348845
Med Image Anal. 2016 Oct;33:176-180
pubmed: 27498015
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Oct;266(10):1527-31
pubmed: 19308437
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Apr;36(4):610-7
pubmed: 25634464
Ear Hear. 2014 Jan-Feb;35(1):e9-20
pubmed: 24196418
Laryngoscope. 2005 May;115(5):796-802
pubmed: 15867642
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2016 Nov 29;1(6):169-174
pubmed: 28894813
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2016 Jun;133 Suppl 1:S63-5
pubmed: 27256964
J Otol. 2019 Sep;14(3):94-100
pubmed: 31467506
Acta Otolaryngol. 2011 Jun;131(6):585-95
pubmed: 21281057
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Jun;30(4):471-7
pubmed: 19415036
Cochlear Implants Int. 2017 Jul;18(4):192-197
pubmed: 28534710
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Aug;40(7):900-910
pubmed: 31135680
HNO. 2021 Jan;69(Suppl 1):24-30
pubmed: 33459799
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Aug;30(7):1425-30
pubmed: 19386728
Cochlear Implants Int. 2009;10 Suppl 1:96-9
pubmed: 19230032
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Apr 1;42(4):e438-e444
pubmed: 33306661
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Jun;34(4):667-74
pubmed: 23640087
Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Nov;30(9):1323-41
pubmed: 22770690
Cochlear Implants Int. 2014 Sep;15 Suppl 2:S1-15
pubmed: 24915284
Audiol Neurootol. 2016;21(5):316-325
pubmed: 27871074
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Feb;40(2):145-153
pubmed: 30624395
Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11 Suppl 1:27-33
pubmed: 17063008
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Jan;30(1):14-22
pubmed: 18833017
Audiol Neurootol. 2021;26(5):361-367
pubmed: 33902040
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2016 Jun;133 Suppl 1:S61-2
pubmed: 27246747
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Mar 30;3(4):192-199
pubmed: 29780962
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014 Sep;34(5):502-8
pubmed: 24697967
Z Med Phys. 2021 Aug;31(3):254-264
pubmed: 33648794
Otol Neurotol. 2022 Feb 1;43(2):e153-e164
pubmed: 35015749
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Oct;30(7):908-15
pubmed: 19730148
Otol Neurotol. 2022 Apr 1;43(4):e427-e434
pubmed: 35213473
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jun;131(6):1358-1368
pubmed: 33159469
Int J Audiol. 2013 Dec;52(12):838-48
pubmed: 23992489
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Nov;15(4):299-309
pubmed: 36397263
Audiol Neurootol. 2022;27(2):148-155
pubmed: 34284383

Auteurs

Irumee Pai (I)

School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK. Irumee.Pai@gstt.nhs.uk.
St. Thomas' Hearing Implant Centre, St. Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, 2nd Floor Lambeth Wing, London, SE1 7EH, UK. Irumee.Pai@gstt.nhs.uk.

Steve Connor (S)

School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Radiology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Department of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Charalampos Komninos (C)

School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Sebastien Ourselin (S)

School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Christos Bergeles (C)

School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH