The antibacterial properties of branched peptides based on poly(l-arginine): In vitro antibacterial evaluation and molecular dynamic simulations.

The emergence of bacterial strains resistant to antibiotics is a major issue in the medical field. Antimicrobial peptides are widely studied as they do not generate as much resistant bacterial strains as conventional antibiotics and present a broad range of activity. Among them, the homopolypeptide poly(l-arginine) presents promising antibacterial properties, especially in the perspective of its use in biomaterials. Linear poly(l-arginine) has been extensively studied but the impact of its 3D structure remains unknown. In this study, the antibacterial properties of newly synthesized branched poly(l-arginine) peptides, belonging to the family of multiple antigenic peptides, are evaluated. First, in vitro activities of the peptides shows that branched poly(l-arginine) is more efficient than linear poly(l-arginine) containing the same number of arginine residues. Surprisingly, peptides with more arms and more residues are not the most effective. To better understand these unexpected results, interactions between these peptides and the membranes of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria are simulated thanks to molecular dynamic. It is observed that the bacterial membrane is more distorted by the branched structure than by the linear one and by peptides containing smaller arms. This mechanism of action is in full agreement with in vitro results and suggest that our simulations form a robust model to evaluate peptide efficiency towards pathogenic bacteria.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Lavalle reports financial support was provided by Région Grand Est. Vrana reports was provided by European Council. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.