Cyclophilin A supports translation of intrinsically disordered proteins and affects haematopoietic stem cell ageing.
Journal
Nature cell biology
ISSN: 1476-4679
Titre abrégé: Nat Cell Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100890575
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2024
Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
25
04
2022
accepted:
23
02
2024
medline:
18
4
2024
pubmed:
30
3
2024
entrez:
30
3
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Loss of protein function is a driving force of ageing. We have identified peptidyl-prolyl isomerase A (PPIA or cyclophilin A) as a dominant chaperone in haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Depletion of PPIA accelerates stem cell ageing. We found that proteins with intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are frequent PPIA substrates. IDRs facilitate interactions with other proteins or nucleic acids and can trigger liquid-liquid phase separation. Over 20% of PPIA substrates are involved in the formation of supramolecular membrane-less organelles. PPIA affects regulators of stress granules (PABPC1), P-bodies (DDX6) and nucleoli (NPM1) to promote phase separation and increase cellular stress resistance. Haematopoietic stem cell ageing is associated with a post-transcriptional decrease in PPIA expression and reduced translation of IDR-rich proteins. Here we link the chaperone PPIA to the synthesis of intrinsically disordered proteins, which indicates that impaired protein interaction networks and macromolecular condensation may be potential determinants of haematopoietic stem cell ageing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38553595
doi: 10.1038/s41556-024-01387-x
pii: 10.1038/s41556-024-01387-x
pmc: PMC11021199
doi:
Substances chimiques
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
0
Cyclophilin A
EC 5.2.1.-
RNA-Binding Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
593-603Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA125123
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : P30 DK056338
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK115454
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCRR NIH HHS
ID : S10 RR024574
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : T32 DK060445
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM142143
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Sun, J. et al. Clonal dynamics of native haematopoiesis. Nature 514, 322–327 (2014).
pubmed: 25296256
pmcid: 4408613
doi: 10.1038/nature13824
Lopez-Otin, C., Blasco, M. A., Partridge, L., Serrano, M. & Kroemer, G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell 153, 1194–1217 (2013).
pubmed: 23746838
pmcid: 3836174
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039
Signer, R. A., Magee, J. A., Salic, A. & Morrison, S. J. Haematopoietic stem cells require a highly regulated protein synthesis rate. Nature 509, 49–54 (2014).
pubmed: 24670665
pmcid: 4015626
doi: 10.1038/nature13035
Hidalgo San Jose, L. et al. Modest declines in proteome quality impair hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal. Cell Rep. 30, 69–80 (2020).
pubmed: 31914399
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.003
Mohrin, M. et al. Stem cell aging. A mitochondrial UPR-mediated metabolic checkpoint regulates hematopoietic stem cell aging. Science 347, 1374–1377 (2015).
pubmed: 25792330
pmcid: 4447312
doi: 10.1126/science.aaa2361
Kruta, M. et al. Hsf1 promotes hematopoietic stem cell fitness and proteostasis in response to ex vivo culture stress and aging. Cell Stem Cell 28, 1950–1965 (2021).
pubmed: 34388375
pmcid: 8571035
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2021.07.009
Hipp, M. S., Kasturi, P. & Hartl, F. U. The proteostasis network and its decline in ageing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 421–435 (2019).
pubmed: 30733602
doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0101-y
Brehme, M. et al. A chaperome subnetwork safeguards proteostasis in aging and neurodegenerative disease. Cell Rep. 9, 1135–1150 (2014).
pubmed: 25437566
pmcid: 4255334
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.09.042
Pálovics, R. et al. Molecular hallmarks of heterochronic parabiosis at single-cell resolution. Nature 603, 309–314 (2022).
pubmed: 35236985
pmcid: 9387403
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04461-2
Boraldi, F. et al. Proteome analysis of dermal fibroblasts cultured in vitro from human healthy subjects of different ages. Proteomics 3, 917–929 (2003).
pubmed: 12833515
doi: 10.1002/pmic.200300386
Babu, M. et al. Proline/arginine dipeptide repeat polymers derail protein folding in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat. Commun. 12, 3396 (2021).
pubmed: 34099711
pmcid: 8184751
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23691-y
Wright, P. E. & Dyson, H. J. Intrinsically disordered proteins in cellular signalling and regulation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 18–29 (2015).
pubmed: 25531225
pmcid: 4405151
doi: 10.1038/nrm3920
Mollica, L. et al. Binding mechanisms of intrinsically disordered proteins: theory, simulation and experiment. Front. Mol. Biosci. 3, 52 (2016).
pubmed: 27668217
pmcid: 5016563
doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2016.00052
Nilsson, J., Grahn, M. & Wright, A. P. Proteome-wide evidence for enhanced positive Darwinian selection within intrinsically disordered regions in proteins. Genome Biol. 12, R65 (2011).
pubmed: 21771306
pmcid: 3218827
doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-7-r65
Afanasyeva, A., Bockwoldt, M., Cooney, C. R., Heiland, I. & Gossmann, T. I. Human long intrinsically disordered protein regions are frequent targets of positive selection. Genome Res. 28, 975–982 (2018).
pubmed: 29858274
pmcid: 6028134
doi: 10.1101/gr.232645.117
Zaro, B. W. et al. Proteomic analysis of young and old mouse hematopoietic stem cells and their progenitors reveals post-transcriptional regulation in stem cells. eLife 9, e62210 (2020).
pubmed: 33236985
pmcid: 7688314
doi: 10.7554/eLife.62210
Davis, T. L. et al. Structural and biochemical characterization of the human cyclophilin family of peptidyl-prolyl isomerases. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000439 (2010).
pubmed: 20676357
pmcid: 2911226
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000439
Schmidpeter, P. A., Koch, J. R. & Schmid, F. X. Control of protein function by prolyl isomerization. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1850, 1973–1982 (2015).
pubmed: 25542300
doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.12.019
Colgan, J. et al. Cyclophilin A regulates TCR signal strength in CD4
pubmed: 15308100
doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.07.005
Satoh, K. et al. Cyclophilin A mediates vascular remodeling by promoting inflammation and vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. Circulation 117, 3088–3098 (2008).
pubmed: 18541741
pmcid: 2775430
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.756106
Beerman, I. et al. Functionally distinct hematopoietic stem cells modulate hematopoietic lineage potential during aging by a mechanism of clonal expansion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5465–5470 (2010).
pubmed: 20304793
pmcid: 2851806
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000834107
Rossi, D. J., Jamieson, C. H. & Weissman, I. L. Stems cells and the pathways to aging and cancer. Cell 132, 681–696 (2008).
pubmed: 18295583
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.036
Oh, J., Lee, Y. D. & Wagers, A. J. Stem cell aging: mechanisms, regulators and therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Med. 20, 870–880 (2014).
pubmed: 25100532
pmcid: 4160113
doi: 10.1038/nm.3651
Goodell, M. A. & Rando, T. A. Stem cells and healthy aging. Science 350, 1199–1204 (2015).
pubmed: 26785478
doi: 10.1126/science.aab3388
Geiger, H., de Haan, G. & Florian, M. C. The ageing haematopoietic stem cell compartment. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 13, 376–389 (2013).
pubmed: 23584423
doi: 10.1038/nri3433
Wang, P. & Heitman, J. The cyclophilins. Genome Biol. 6, 226 (2005).
pubmed: 15998457
pmcid: 1175980
doi: 10.1186/gb-2005-6-7-226
Nigro, P., Pompilio, G. & Capogrossi, M. C. Cyclophilin A: a key player for human disease. Cell Death Dis. 4, e888 (2013).
pubmed: 24176846
pmcid: 3920964
doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.410
Lang, K., Schmid, F. X. & Fischer, G. Catalysis of protein folding by prolyl isomerase. Nature 329, 268–270 (1987).
pubmed: 3306408
doi: 10.1038/329268a0
Kiefhaber, T., Quaas, R., Hahn, U. & Schmid, F. X. Folding of ribonuclease T1. 2. Kinetic models for the folding and unfolding reactions. Biochemistry 29, 3061–3070 (1990).
pubmed: 2110824
doi: 10.1021/bi00464a024
Wedemeyer, W. J., Welker, E. & Scheraga, H. A. Proline cis–trans isomerization and protein folding. Biochemistry 41, 14637–14644 (2002).
pubmed: 12475212
doi: 10.1021/bi020574b
Jakob, R. P., Zoldák, G., Aumüller, T. & Schmid, F. X. Chaperone domains convert prolyl isomerases into generic catalysts of protein folding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 20282–20287 (2009).
pubmed: 19920179
pmcid: 2787138
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909544106
Cardenas, M. E., Lim, E. & Heitman, J. Mutations that perturb cyclophilin A ligand binding pocket confer cyclosporin A resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 20997–21002 (1995).
pubmed: 7673124
doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.36.20997
Boeynaems, S. et al. Protein phase separation: a new phase in cell biology. Trends Cell Biol. 28, 420–435 (2018).
pubmed: 29602697
pmcid: 6034118
doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.02.004
Gomes, E. & Shorter, J. The molecular language of membraneless organelles. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 7115–7127 (2019).
pubmed: 30045872
doi: 10.1074/jbc.TM118.001192
Schwanhausser, B. et al. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 473, 337–342 (2011).
pubmed: 21593866
doi: 10.1038/nature10098
Pentony, M. M. & Jones, D. T. Modularity of intrinsic disorder in the human proteome. Proteins 78, 212–221 (2010).
pubmed: 19626706
doi: 10.1002/prot.22504
Ni, S. et al. Discovering potent small molecule inhibitors of cyclophilin A using de novo drug design approach. J. Med. Chem. 52, 5295–5298 (2009).
pubmed: 19691347
doi: 10.1021/jm9008295
Jain, S. & Parker, R. The discovery and analysis of P Bodies. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 768, 23–43 (2013).
pubmed: 23224963
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5107-5_3
Anderson, P., Kedersha, N. & Ivanov, P. Stress granules, P-bodies and cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1849, 861–870 (2015).
pubmed: 25482014
doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.11.009
Hondele, M. et al. DEAD-box ATPases are global regulators of phase-separated organelles. Nature 573, 144–148 (2019).
pubmed: 31435012
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1502-y
Markmiller, S. et al. Context-dependent and disease-specific diversity in protein interactions within stress granules. Cell 172, 590–604 (2018).
pubmed: 29373831
pmcid: 5969999
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.032
Lallemand-Breitenbach, V. & de Thé, H. PML nuclear bodies: from architecture to function. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 52, 154–161 (2018).
pubmed: 29723661
doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2018.03.011
Kato, M. et al. Cell-free formation of RNA granules: low complexity sequence domains form dynamic fibers within hydrogels. Cell 149, 753–767 (2012).
pubmed: 22579281
pmcid: 6347373
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.017
Tabula Muris Consortium. A single-cell transcriptomic atlas characterizes ageing tissues in the mouse. Nature 583, 590–595 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2496-1
Flohr Svendsen, A. et al. A comprehensive transcriptome signature of murine hematopoietic stem cell aging. Blood 138, 439–451 (2021).
pubmed: 33876187
doi: 10.1182/blood.2020009729
Nott, T. J. et al. Phase transition of a disordered nuage protein generates environmentally responsive membraneless organelles. Mol. Cell 57, 936–947 (2015).
pubmed: 25747659
pmcid: 4352761
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.01.013
Sanders, D. W. et al. Competing protein–RNA interaction networks control multiphase intracellular organization. Cell 181, 306–324 (2020).
pubmed: 32302570
pmcid: 7816278
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.050
Alberti, S., Gladfelter, A. & Mittag, T. Considerations and challenges in studying liquid-liquid phase separation and biomolecular condensates. Cell 176, 419–434 (2019).
pubmed: 30682370
pmcid: 6445271
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.035
Riback, J. A. et al. Stress-triggered phase separation is an adaptive, evolutionarily tuned response. Cell 168, 1028–1040 (2017).
pubmed: 28283059
pmcid: 5401687
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.027
Vanderweyde, T., Youmans, K., Liu-Yesucevitz, L. & Wolozin, B. Role of stress granules and RNA-binding proteins in neurodegeneration: a mini-review. Gerontology 59, 524–533 (2013).
pubmed: 24008580
doi: 10.1159/000354170
Kornmann, B. & Weis, K. Liquid but not contactless. Science 367, 507–508 (2020).
pubmed: 32001641
doi: 10.1126/science.aba3771
Chua, B. A. et al. Hematopoietic stem cells preferentially traffic misfolded proteins to aggresomes and depend on aggrephagy to maintain protein homeostasis. Cell Stem Cell 30, 460–472 (2023).
pubmed: 36948186
pmcid: 10164413
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2023.02.010
Hartl, F. U. & Hayer-Hartl, M. Molecular chaperones in the cytosol: from nascent chain to folded protein. Science 295, 1852–1858 (2002).
pubmed: 11884745
doi: 10.1126/science.1068408
Kandala, D. T., Del Piano, A., Minati, L. & Clamer, M. Targeting translation activity at the ribosome interface with UV-active small molecules. ACS Omega 4, 10336–10345 (2019).
pubmed: 31460127
pmcid: 6648492
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b00366
Favretto, F. et al. Catalysis of proline isomerization and molecular chaperone activity in a tug-of-war. Nat. Commun. 11, 6046 (2020).
pubmed: 33247146
pmcid: 7695863
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19844-0
Xiang, S. et al. The LC domain of hnRNPA2 adopts similar conformations in hydrogel polymers, liquid-like droplets and nuclei. Cell 163, 829–839 (2015).
pubmed: 26544936
pmcid: 4879888
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.040
Ciferri, A. & Orofino, T. A. Phase separation of poly-L-proline in salt solutions. J. Phys. Chem. 70, 3277–3285 (1966).
doi: 10.1021/j100882a042
Jahn, T. R., Parker, M. J., Homans, S. W. & Radford, S. E. Amyloid formation under physiological conditions proceeds via a native-like folding intermediate. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 195–201 (2006).
pubmed: 16491092
doi: 10.1038/nsmb1058
Wolozin, B. & Ivanov, P. Stress granules and neurodegeneration. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 649–666 (2019).
pubmed: 31582840
pmcid: 6986315
doi: 10.1038/s41583-019-0222-5
Nakamura, K. et al. Proline isomer-specific antibodies reveal the early pathogenic tau conformation in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 149, 232–244 (2012).
pubmed: 22464332
pmcid: 3601591
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.016
Riback, J. A. et al. Composition-dependent thermodynamics of intracellular phase separation. Nature 581, 209–214 (2020).
pubmed: 32405004
pmcid: 7733533
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2256-2
Babu, M., Favretto, F., Rankovic, M. & Zweckstetter, M. Peptidyl prolyl isomerase a modulates the liquid-liquid phase separation of proline-rich IDPs. J. Am. Chem. Sci. 144, 16157–16163 (2022).
doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c07149
Daito, T. et al. Cyclophilin inhibitors reduce phosphorylation of RNA-dependent protein kinase to restore expression of IFN-stimulated genes in HCV-infected cells. Gastroenterology 147, 463–472 (2014).
pubmed: 24786893
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.04.035
Selbach, M. et al. Widespread changes in protein synthesis induced by microRNAs. Nature 455, 58–63 (2008).
pubmed: 18668040
doi: 10.1038/nature07228
De Maio, A. et al. RBM17 Interacts with U2SURP and CHERP to regulate expression and splicing of RNA-processing proteins. Cell Rep. 25, 726–736 (2018).
pubmed: 30332651
pmcid: 6292215
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.09.041
Jung, S. Y. et al. An anatomically resolved mouse brain proteome reveals Parkinson disease-relevant pathways. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 16, 581–593 (2017).
pubmed: 28153913
pmcid: 5383780
doi: 10.1074/mcp.M116.061440
Ferreon, J. C. et al. Acetylation disfavors tau phase separation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 1360 (2018).
pubmed: 29734651
pmcid: 5983838
doi: 10.3390/ijms19051360
Mészáros, B., Erdős, G. & Dosztányi, Z. IUPred2A: context-dependent prediction of protein disorder as a function of redox state and protein binding. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W329–W337 (2018).
pubmed: 29860432
pmcid: 6030935
doi: 10.1093/nar/gky384
Erdős, G. & Dosztányi, Z. Analyzing protein disorder with IUPred2A. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 70, e99 (2020).
pubmed: 32237272
doi: 10.1002/cpbi.99
Lo Celso, C., Lin, C. P. & Scadden, D. T. In vivo imaging of transplanted hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in mouse calvarium bone marrow. Nat. Protoc. 6, 1–14 (2011).
pubmed: 21212779
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.168
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).
pubmed: 22743772
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019
Brunetti, L., Gundry, M.C., Kitano, A., Nakada, D. & Goodell, M. A. Highly efficient gene disruption of murine and human hematopoietic progenitor cells by CRISPR/Cas9. J. Vis. Exp. 2018, 57278 (2018).
Moreno-Mateos, M. A. et al. CRISPRscan: designing highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 targeting in vivo. Nat. Methods 12, 982–988 (2015).
pubmed: 26322839
pmcid: 4589495
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3543
Mai, T. T., Tran, D. Q., Roos, S., Rhoads, J. M. & Liu, Y. Human breast milk promotes the secretion of potentially beneficial metabolites by probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938. Nutrients 11, 1548 (2019).
pubmed: 31323989
pmcid: 6683045
doi: 10.3390/nu11071548
Wilkinson, A. C., Ishida, R., Nakauchi, H. & Yamazaki, S. Long-term ex vivo expansion of mouse hematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Protoc. 15, 628–648 (2020).
pubmed: 31915389
pmcid: 7206416
doi: 10.1038/s41596-019-0263-2
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.journal 17, 10–12 (2011).
doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200
Kim, D. et al. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14, R36 (2013).
pubmed: 23618408
pmcid: 4053844
doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36
Trapnell, C. et al. Differential analysis of gene regulation at transcript resolution with RNA-seq. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 46–53 (2013).
pubmed: 23222703
doi: 10.1038/nbt.2450
Garcia-Fossa, F. et al. Interpreting image-based profiles using similarity clustering and single-cell visualization. Curr. Protoc. 3, e713 (2023).
pubmed: 36921124
pmcid: 10027367
doi: 10.1002/cpz1.713
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
pubmed: 16199517
pmcid: 1239896
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102
Hou, C. et al. PhaSepDB in 2022: annotating phase separation-related proteins with droplet states, co-phase separation partners and other experimental information. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D460–D465 (2023).
pubmed: 36124686
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac783