Information heterogeneity between progress notes by physicians and nurses for inpatients with digestive system diseases.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 04 2024
01 04 2024
Historique:
received:
08
06
2023
accepted:
05
03
2024
medline:
3
4
2024
pubmed:
2
4
2024
entrez:
1
4
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study focused on the heterogeneity in progress notes written by physicians or nurses. A total of 806 days of progress notes written by physicians or nurses from 83 randomly selected patients hospitalized in the Gastroenterology Department at Kagawa University Hospital from January to December 2021 were analyzed. We extracted symptoms as the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) Chapter 18 (R00-R99, hereinafter R codes) from each progress note using MedNER-J natural language processing software and counted the days one or more symptoms were extracted to calculate the extraction rate. The R-code extraction rate was significantly higher from progress notes by nurses than by physicians (physicians 68.5% vs. nurses 75.2%; p = 0.00112), regardless of specialty. By contrast, the R-code subcategory R10-R19 for digestive system symptoms (44.2 vs. 37.5%, respectively; p = 0.00299) and many chapters of ICD codes for disease names, as represented by Chapter 11 K00-K93 (68.4 vs. 30.9%, respectively; p < 0.001), were frequently extracted from the progress notes by physicians, reflecting their specialty. We believe that understanding the information heterogeneity of medical documents, which can be the basis of medical artificial intelligence, is crucial, and this study is a pioneering step in that direction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38561333
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56324-7
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-56324-7
pmc: PMC10984979
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7656Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Kidney Int. 2020 Feb;97(2):383-392
pubmed: 31883805
Nature. 2018 Jul;559(7714):324-326
pubmed: 30018439
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:1056-1060
pubmed: 31438086
Nat Med. 2022 Oct;28(10):1996-1999
pubmed: 36097217
Drug Saf. 2017 Nov;40(11):1075-1089
pubmed: 28643174
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2019 Jan-Feb;16(1):139-153
pubmed: 29994486
Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 2020;117(9):779-787
pubmed: 32908108
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:1059
pubmed: 26262358
JAMIA Open. 2020 Dec 05;3(4):513-517
pubmed: 33623888
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Dec;20(e2):e232-8
pubmed: 24001516
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;160(Pt 1):739-43
pubmed: 20841784
Spine J. 2022 Feb;22(2):272-277
pubmed: 34407468
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:285-288
pubmed: 29295100
Lang Linguist Compass. 2021 Aug;15(8):e12432
pubmed: 35864931
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2233348
pubmed: 36156143
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Apr 1;26(4):364-379
pubmed: 30726935
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Nov 13;21(1):577
pubmed: 34774027
Nurs Outlook. 2016 Sep-Oct;64(5):499-506
pubmed: 27349632
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Nov 27;8(11):e22661
pubmed: 33245290
Nurs Res. 2021 May-Jun 01;70(3):173-183
pubmed: 33196504
JMIR Med Inform. 2018 Sep 27;6(3):e11021
pubmed: 30262450
Int Nurs Rev. 2014 Dec;61(4):487-90
pubmed: 25168623
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Jan;66(1):29-40
pubmed: 32107677
JAMA. 2011 Aug 24;306(8):880-1
pubmed: 21862751
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Oct 12;28(11):2393-2403
pubmed: 34383925
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Jan;77:34-49
pubmed: 29162496