Plant- and animal- derived dietary sources of phosphatidylcholine have differential effects on immune function in the context of a high-fat diet in male Wistar rats.

egg high-fat diet immunology obesity phosphatidylcholine soy

Journal

The Journal of nutrition
ISSN: 1541-6100
Titre abrégé: J Nutr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0404243

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 26 10 2023
revised: 20 03 2024
accepted: 02 04 2024
medline: 7 4 2024
pubmed: 7 4 2024
entrez: 6 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Phosphatidylcholine (PC) derived from eggs has been shown to beneficially modulate T cell response and intestinal permeability under the context of a high-fat diet. The objective of this study was to determine whether there is a differential effect of plant and animal-derived sources of PC on immune function. Four-week-old male Wistar rats were randomized to consume one of 4 diets (n=10/group) for 12 weeks, all containing 1.5g of total choline/kg of diet but differing in choline forms: 1- Control Low-Fat (CLF, 20% fat, 100% free choline (FC)); 2- Control High-Fat (CHF, 50% fat, 100% FC); 3- High-Fat Egg-derived PC (EPC, 50% fat, 100% Egg-PC); 4- High-Fat Soy-derived PC (SPC, 50% fat, 100% Soy-PC). Immune cell functions and phenotypes were measured in splenocytes by ex vivo cytokine production after mitogen stimulation and flow cytometry, respectively. The SPC diet increased splenocyte IL-2 production after PMA+I stimulation compared to the CHF diet. However, the SPC group had a lower proportion of splenocytes expressing the IL-2 receptor (CD25+, p < 0.05). After PMA+I stimulation, feeding EPC normalized splenocyte production of IL-10 relative to the CLF diet while SPC did not (p < 0.05). In mesenteric lymph node lymphocytes, the SPC diet group produced more IL-2 and TNF-α after PMA+I stimulation than the CHF diet, while the EPC diet group did not. Our results suggest that both egg- and soy-derived PC may attenuate high-fat diet-induced T cell dysfunction. However, egg-PC enhances to a greater extent IL-10, a cytokine involved in promoting the resolution phase of inflammation, while soy-PC appears to elicit a greater effect on gut-associated immune responses.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Phosphatidylcholine (PC) derived from eggs has been shown to beneficially modulate T cell response and intestinal permeability under the context of a high-fat diet.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to determine whether there is a differential effect of plant and animal-derived sources of PC on immune function.
METHODS METHODS
Four-week-old male Wistar rats were randomized to consume one of 4 diets (n=10/group) for 12 weeks, all containing 1.5g of total choline/kg of diet but differing in choline forms: 1- Control Low-Fat (CLF, 20% fat, 100% free choline (FC)); 2- Control High-Fat (CHF, 50% fat, 100% FC); 3- High-Fat Egg-derived PC (EPC, 50% fat, 100% Egg-PC); 4- High-Fat Soy-derived PC (SPC, 50% fat, 100% Soy-PC). Immune cell functions and phenotypes were measured in splenocytes by ex vivo cytokine production after mitogen stimulation and flow cytometry, respectively.
RESULTS RESULTS
The SPC diet increased splenocyte IL-2 production after PMA+I stimulation compared to the CHF diet. However, the SPC group had a lower proportion of splenocytes expressing the IL-2 receptor (CD25+, p < 0.05). After PMA+I stimulation, feeding EPC normalized splenocyte production of IL-10 relative to the CLF diet while SPC did not (p < 0.05). In mesenteric lymph node lymphocytes, the SPC diet group produced more IL-2 and TNF-α after PMA+I stimulation than the CHF diet, while the EPC diet group did not.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our results suggest that both egg- and soy-derived PC may attenuate high-fat diet-induced T cell dysfunction. However, egg-PC enhances to a greater extent IL-10, a cytokine involved in promoting the resolution phase of inflammation, while soy-PC appears to elicit a greater effect on gut-associated immune responses.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38582387
pii: S0022-3166(24)00175-5
doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.04.004
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Tianna Rusnak (T)

Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E1.

Jessy Azarcoya-Barrera (J)

Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E1.

Alexander Makarowski (A)

Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E1.

René L Jacobs (RL)

Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E1.

Caroline Richard (C)

Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E1. Electronic address: cr5@ualberta.ca.

Classifications MeSH