Niche-dependent sponge hologenome expression profiles and the host-microbes interplay: a case of the hawaiian demosponge Mycale Grandis.
Mycale Grandis
(Meta)transcriptome
Gene expression
GeoChip microarray
Hologenome
Host-microbe interplay
Journal
Environmental microbiome
ISSN: 2524-6372
Titre abrégé: Environ Microbiome
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101768168
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Apr 2024
08 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
08
08
2023
accepted:
14
03
2024
medline:
9
4
2024
pubmed:
9
4
2024
entrez:
8
4
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Most researches on sponge holobionts focus primarily on symbiotic microbes, yet data at the level of the sponge hologenome are still relatively scarce. Understanding of the sponge host and its microbial gene expression profiles and the host-microbes interplay in different niches represents a key aspect of sponge hologenome. Using the Hawaiian demosponge Mycale grandis in different niches as a model, i.e. on rocks, on the surface of coral Porites compressa, under alga Gracilaria salicornia, we compared the bacterial and fungal community structure, functional gene diversity, expression pattern and the host transcriptome by integrating open-format (deep sequencing) and closed-format (GeoChip microarray) high-throughput techniques. Little inter-niche variation in bacterial and fungal phylogenetic diversity was detected for M. grandis in different niches, but a clear niche-dependent variability in the functional gene diversity and expression pattern of M. grandis host and its symbiotic microbiota was uncovered by GeoChip microarray and transcriptome analyses. Particularly, sponge host genes related to innate immunity and microbial recognition showed a strong correlation with the microbial symbionts' functional gene diversity and transcriptional richness in different niches. The cross-niche variability with respect to the symbiont functional gene diversity and the transcriptional richness of M. grandis holobiont putatively reflects the interplay of niche-specific selective pressure and the symbiont functional diversity. Niche-dependent gene expression profiles of M. grandis hologenome and the host-microbes interplay were suggested though little inter-niche variation in bacterial and fungal diversity was detected, particularly the sponge innate immunity was found to be closely related to the symbiotic microbes. Altogether, these findings provide novel insights into the black box of one sponge holobiont in different niches at the hologenome level.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Most researches on sponge holobionts focus primarily on symbiotic microbes, yet data at the level of the sponge hologenome are still relatively scarce. Understanding of the sponge host and its microbial gene expression profiles and the host-microbes interplay in different niches represents a key aspect of sponge hologenome. Using the Hawaiian demosponge Mycale grandis in different niches as a model, i.e. on rocks, on the surface of coral Porites compressa, under alga Gracilaria salicornia, we compared the bacterial and fungal community structure, functional gene diversity, expression pattern and the host transcriptome by integrating open-format (deep sequencing) and closed-format (GeoChip microarray) high-throughput techniques.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Little inter-niche variation in bacterial and fungal phylogenetic diversity was detected for M. grandis in different niches, but a clear niche-dependent variability in the functional gene diversity and expression pattern of M. grandis host and its symbiotic microbiota was uncovered by GeoChip microarray and transcriptome analyses. Particularly, sponge host genes related to innate immunity and microbial recognition showed a strong correlation with the microbial symbionts' functional gene diversity and transcriptional richness in different niches. The cross-niche variability with respect to the symbiont functional gene diversity and the transcriptional richness of M. grandis holobiont putatively reflects the interplay of niche-specific selective pressure and the symbiont functional diversity.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Niche-dependent gene expression profiles of M. grandis hologenome and the host-microbes interplay were suggested though little inter-niche variation in bacterial and fungal diversity was detected, particularly the sponge innate immunity was found to be closely related to the symbiotic microbes. Altogether, these findings provide novel insights into the black box of one sponge holobiont in different niches at the hologenome level.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38589941
doi: 10.1186/s40793-024-00563-8
pii: 10.1186/s40793-024-00563-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
22Subventions
Organisme : This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 31861143020, 41776138
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Srivastava M, Simakov O, Chapman J, Fahey B, Gauthier MEA, Mitros T, Richards GS, Conaco C, Dacre M, Hellsten U, Larroux C, Putnam NH, Stanke M, Adamska M, Darling A, Degnan SM, Oakley TH, Plachetzk DCi, Zhai Y, Adamski M, Calcino A, Cummins SF, Goodstein DM, Harris C, Jackson DJ, Leys SP, Shu S, Woodcroft BJ, Vervoort M, Kosik KS, Manning G, Degnan BM, Rokhsar DS. The Amphimedon queenslandica genome and the evolution of animal complexity. Nature. 2010;466:720–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09201 .
doi: 10.1038/nature09201
pubmed: 20686567
pmcid: 3130542
Moitinho-Silva L, Nielsen S, Amir A, Gonzalez A, Ackermann GL, Cerrano C, Astudillo-Garcia C, EassonC, Sipkema D, Liu F, Steinert G, Kotoulas G, McCormack GP, Feng G, Bell JJ, Vicente J, Björk JR, Montoya JM, Olson JB, Reveillaud J, Steindler L, Pineda M-C, Marra MV, Ilan M, Taylor MW, Polymenakou P, Erwin PM, Schupp PJ, Simister RL, Knight R, Thacker RW, Costa R, Hill RT, Lopez-Legentil S, Dailianis T, Ravasi T, Hentschel U, Li Z, Webster NS, ThomasT. The sponge microbiome project. GigaScience. 2017;6:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/gix077 .
doi: 10.1093/gigascience/gix077
pubmed: 29020741
Thomas T, Moitinho-Silva L, Lurgi M, Björk J, Easson CG, Astudillo-Garcia C, Olson J, Erwin P, López‐Legentil S, Luter H, Chaves‐Fonnegra A, Costa R, Schupp P, Steindler L, Erpenbeck D, Gilbert J, Knight R, Ackermann G, Lopez JV, Taylor MW, Thacker R, Montoya J, Hentschel U, Webste N. Diversity, structure and convergent evolution of the global sponge microbiome. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11870. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11870 .
doi: 10.1038/ncomms11870
pubmed: 27306690
pmcid: 4912640
Webster NS, Thomas T. The sponge hologenome. mBio. 2016;7:e00135–00116. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00135-16 .
doi: 10.1128/mBio.00135-16
pubmed: 27103626
pmcid: 4850255
Vargas S, Leiva L, Eitel M, Curdt F, Rohde S, Arnold C, Nickel M, Schupp P, Orsi WD, Adamska M, Wörheide G. Body-plan reorganization in a sponge correlates with microbiome change. Mol Bio Evol. 2023;40:msad138. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msad138 .
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msad138
Pita L, Fraune S, Hentschel U. Emerging sponge models of animal-microbe symbioses. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:2102. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02102 .
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02102
pubmed: 28066403
pmcid: 5179597
Liu C, Xiao Y, Xiao Y, Li Z. Marine urease with higher thermostability, pH and salinity tolerance from marine sponge-derived Penicillium steckii S4-4. Mar Life Sci Technol. 2021;3:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42995-020-00076-6 .
doi: 10.1007/s42995-020-00076-6
pubmed: 37073394
Carroll AR, Copp BR, Davis RA, Keyzers RA, Prinsep MR. Marine natural products. Nat Prod Rep. 2022;39:1122–71. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NP00076D .
doi: 10.1039/D1NP00076D
pubmed: 35201245
Griffiths SM, Antwis RE, Lenzi L, Lucaci A, Behringer DC, Butler IVMJ, Preziosi RF. Host genetics and geography influence microbiome composition in the sponge Ircinia campana. J Anim Ecol. 2019;88:1684–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13065 .
doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13065
pubmed: 31325164
pmcid: 6899969
Easson CG, Chaves-Fonnegra A, Thacker RW, Lopez JV. Host population genetics and biogeography structure the microbiome of the sponge Cliona delitrix. Ecol Evol. 2020;10:2007–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6033 .
doi: 10.1002/ece3.6033
pubmed: 32128133
pmcid: 7042757
Raijman-Nagar L, Goren L, Shefer S, Moskovich R, Li Z, Ilan M. A comparison of mesophotic and shallow sponge holobionts resilience to predicted future temperature elevation. Front Mar Sci. 2023;10:1161648. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1161648 .
doi: 10.3389/fmars.2023.1161648
Fan L, Reynolds D, Liu M, Stark M, Kjelleberg S, Webster NS, Thomas T. Functional equivalence and evolutionary convergence in complex communities of microbial sponge symbionts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:E1878–87. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1203287109 .
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203287109
pubmed: 22699508
pmcid: 3390844
Erwin PM, Coma R, Lopez-Sendino P, Serrano E, Ribes M. Stable symbionts across the HMA-LMA dichotomy: low seasonal and interannual variation in sponge-associated bacteria from taxonomically diverse hosts. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2015;91:10. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiv115 .
doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiv115
Coles SL, Bolick H. Invasive introduced sponge Mycale Grandis overgrows reef corals in Kāne’ohe Bay, O’ahu, Hawai’i. Coral Reefs. 2007;26:911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-007-0295-x .
doi: 10.1007/s00338-007-0295-x
Gao Z, Li B, Zheng C, Wang G. Molecular detection of fungal communities in the hawaiian marine sponges Suberites zeteki and Mycale armata. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:6091–101. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01315-08 .
doi: 10.1128/AEM.01315-08
pubmed: 18676706
pmcid: 2565983
Wang G, Yoon SH, Lefait E. Microbial communities associated with the invasive hawaiian sponge Mycale armata. ISME J. 2009;3:374–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2008.107 .
doi: 10.1038/ismej.2008.107
pubmed: 18987678
Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M, Glöckner FO. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:e1. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks808 .
doi: 10.1093/nar/gks808
pubmed: 22933715
Schmitt S, Hentschel U, Zea S, Dandekar T, Wolf M. ITS-2 and 18S rRNA gene phylogeny of Aplysinidae (verongida, demospongiae). J Mol Evol. 2005;60:327–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-004-0162-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s00239-004-0162-0
pubmed: 15871043
Riesgo A, Pérez-Porro AR, Carmona S, Leys SP, Giribet G. Optimization of preservation and storage time of sponge tissues to obtain quality mRNA for next-generation sequencing. Mol Ecol Resour. 2012;12:312–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03097.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03097.x
pubmed: 22136287
Porter TM, Golding GB. Factors that affect large subunit ribosomal DNA amplicon sequencing studies of fungal communities: classification method, primer choice, and error. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e35749. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035749 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035749
pubmed: 22558215
pmcid: 3338786
Lewit-Bentley A, Réty S. EF-hand calcium-binding proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2000;10:637–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-440x(00)00142-1 .
doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(00)00142-1
pubmed: 11114499
Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Peña AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7:335–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303 .
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303
pubmed: 20383131
pmcid: 3156573
Eren AM, Maignien L, Sul WJ, Murphy LG, Grim SL, Morrison HG, Sogin ML. Oligotyping: differentiating between closely related microbial taxa using 16S rRNA gene data. Methods Ecol Evol. 2013;4:1111–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12114 .
doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12114
pubmed: 24358444
pmcid: 3864673
Edgar RC. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Meth. 2013;10:996–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2604 .
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2604
Liu KL, Porras-Alfaro A, Kuske CR, Eichorst SA, Xie G. Accurate, rapid taxonomic classification of fungal large-subunit rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:1523–33. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.06826-11 .
doi: 10.1128/AEM.06826-11
pubmed: 22194300
pmcid: 3294464
Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. Past: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica. 2001;4:9. https://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htmnica .
Team RC. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/ .
Robertson G, Schein J, Chiu R, Corbett R, Field M, Jackman SD, Mungall K, Lee S, Okada HM, Qian JQ, Griffith M, Raymond A, Thiessen N, Cezard T, Butterfield YS, Newsome R, Chan SK, She R, Varhol R, KamohB, Prabhu A-L, Tam A, Zhao Y, Moore RA, Hirst M, Marra MA, Jones SJM, Hoodless PA, Birol I. De novo assembly and analysis of RNA-seq data. Nat Meth. 2010;7:909–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1517 .
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1517
Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:3150–2. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 .
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565
pubmed: 23060610
pmcid: 3516142
Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Morishima K. BlastKOALA, GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J Mol Biol. 2016;428:726–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.006 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.006
pubmed: 26585406
Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 .
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
pubmed: 19451168
pmcid: 2705234
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. The sequence alignment/map format and SAM tools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 .
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
pubmed: 19505943
pmcid: 2723002
Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of Fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 .
doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
Conesa A, Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M, Robles M. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:3674–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti610 .
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti610
pubmed: 16081474
Jones P, Binns D, Chang H-Y, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, McWilliam H, Maslen J, Mitchell A, Nuka G, Pesseat S, Quinn AF, Sangrador-Vegas A, Scheremetjew M, Yong S-Y, Lopez R, Hunter S. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1236–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031 .
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031
pubmed: 24451626
pmcid: 3998142
Supek F, Bošnjak M, Škunca N, Šmuc T. REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e21800. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021800 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021800
pubmed: 21789182
pmcid: 3138752
Bayer K, Moitinho-Silva L, Brümmer F, Cannistraci CV, Ravasi T, Hentschel U. GeoChip-based insights into the microbial functional gene repertoire of marine sponges (high microbial abundance, low microbial abundance) and seawater. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014;90:832–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6941.12441 .
doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12441
pubmed: 25318900
Martinez JA, Smith CM, Richmond RH. Invasive algal mats degrade coral reef physical habitat quality. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2012;99:42–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2011.12.022 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2011.12.022
Gillespie MN, Pastukh VM, Ruchko MV. Controlled DNA damage and repair in hypoxic signaling. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2010;174:24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2010.08.025 .
doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2010.08.025
Schäcke H, Rinkevich B, Gamulin V, Müller IM, Müller WEG. Immunoglobulin-like domain is present in the extracellular part of the receptor tyrosine kinase from the marine sponge Geodia cydonium. J Mol Recognit. 1994;7:273–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmr.300074-251 .
doi: 10.1002/jmr.300074-251
pubmed: 7734153
Kruse M, Steffen R, Batel R, Müller IM, Müller WEG. Differential expression of allograft inflammatory factor 1 and of glutathione peroxidase during auto- and allograft response in marine sponges. J Cell Sci. 1999;112:4305. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.112.23.4305 .
doi: 10.1242/jcs.112.23.4305
pubmed: 10564648
Steindler L, Schuster S, Ilan M, Avni A, Cerrano C, Beer S. Differential gene expression in a marine sponge in relation to its symbiotic state. Mar Biotechnol. 2007;9:543–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10126-007-9024-2 .
doi: 10.1007/s10126-007-9024-2
Reynolds D, Thomas T. Evolution and function of eukaryotic-like proteins from sponge symbionts. Mol Ecol. 2016;25:5242–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13812 .
doi: 10.1111/mec.13812
pubmed: 27543954
Bork P. Hundreds of ankyrin-like repeats in functionally diverse proteins: mobile modules that cross phyla horizontally? Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform. 1993;17:363–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.340170405 .
doi: 10.1002/prot.340170405
Kobe B, Kajava AV. The leucine-rich repeat as a protein recognition motif. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2001;11:725–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-440x(01)00266-4 .
doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(01)00266-4
pubmed: 11751054
Ryu T, Seridi L, Moitinho-Silva L, Oates M, Liew YJ, Mavromatis C, Wang X, Haywood A, Lafi FF, Kupresanin M, Sougrat R, Alzahrani MA, Giles E, Ghosheh Y, Schunter C, Baumgarten S, Berumen ML, Gao X, Aranda M, Foret S, Gough J, Voolstra CR, Hentschel U, Ravas T. Hologenome analysis of two marine sponges with different microbiomes. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2501-0 .
doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2501-0
pubmed: 26926518
pmcid: 4772301
Leipe DD, Koonin EV, Aravind L. Evolution and classification of P-loop kinases and related proteins. J Mol Biol. 2003;333:781–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2003.08.040 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.08.040
pubmed: 14568537