The Effect of Stoma Site Marking on Stomal Complications: A Long-term Retrospective Study.
Journal
Advances in skin & wound care
ISSN: 1538-8654
Titre abrégé: Adv Skin Wound Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100911021
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 May 2024
01 May 2024
Historique:
medline:
23
4
2024
pubmed:
23
4
2024
entrez:
22
4
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To identify the effect of stoma site marking on stoma-related complications. The study sample included 639 individuals with stomas who were followed up in a stomatherapy unit in Turkey between January 1, 2017, and June 20, 2021. Researchers collected patient data from nursing records. Data were evaluated using number, percentage, χ2, and logistic regression tests. Of the individuals with stomas, 60.6% (n = 387) were men, and 72.6% (n = 464) had a cancer diagnosis. Their mean age was 60.16 (SD, 14.81) years. The stoma site was marked preoperatively in of 67.1% of patients (n = 429), and 17.1% (n = 109) developed stoma-related complications. The complication rate was higher in individuals with unmarked stoma sites (25.7%; P = .000), emergency surgeries (25.0%; P = .006), colostomies (23.9%; P = .042), and permanent stomas (28.3%; P = .002). The three most common complications were peristomal skin problems (56.9%), mucocutaneous separation (13.8%), and edema (9.2%). The incidence of stoma-related complications in the postoperative period was higher in individuals with unmarked stoma sites. The authors recommend that stoma and wound care nurses mark the stoma site in individuals for whom stoma creation is planned.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38648238
doi: 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000134
pii: 00129334-202405000-00007
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
254-259Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Mulita F, Lotfollahzadeh S. Intestinal stoma. [Updated 2022 Jun 3]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK565910/. Last accessed February 20, 2024.
Nichols T. Health utility, social interactivity, and peristomal skin status: a cross-sectional study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2018;45(5):438.
Baykara ZG, Demir SG, Karadag A, et al. A multicenter, retrospective study to evaluate the effect of preoperative stoma site marking on stomal and peristomal complications. Ostomy Wound Manage 2014;60(5):16–26.
Pearson R, Knight SR, Ng James CK, Robertson I, McKenzie C, Macdonald AM. Stoma-related complications following ostomy surgery in 3 acute care hospitals: a cohort study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2020;47(1):32–8.
Ambe PC, Kurz NR, Nitschke C, Odeh SF, Möslein G, Zirngibl H. Intestinal ostomy. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2018;115(11):182–7.
Kim YM, Jang HJ, Lee YJ. The effectiveness of preoperative stoma site marking on patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs 2021;77:4332–46.
Shabbir J, Britton DC. Stoma complications: a literature overview. Colorectal Dis 2010;12(10):958–64.
Gök AFK, Özgür İ, Altunsoy M, et al. Complicated or not complicated: stoma site marking before emergency abdominal surgery. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2019;25(1):60–5.
Diniz IV, Pereira da Silva I, Silva RA, et al. Effects of the quality of life on the adaptation of people with an intestinal stoma. Clin Nurs Res 2023;32(3):527–38.
Berke C, Conley MJ, Netsch D, et al. Role of the wound, ostomy and continence nurse in continence care: 2018 update. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2019;46(3):221–5.
Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society Task Force. Wound, ostomy, and continence nursing: scope and standards of WOC practice: an executive summary. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2018;45(4):369–87.
Cwon IN. WOCN Society, AUA, and ASCRS position statement on preoperative stoma site marking for patients undergoing ostomy surgery. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2021;48(6):533–6.
Members RSC, Committee WOCNS. ASCRS and WOCN joint position statement on the value of preoperative stoma marking for patients undergoing fecal ostomy surgery. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2007;34(6):627–8.
Chabal LO, Prentice JL, Ayello EA. Practice Implications from the WCET® International Ostomy Guideline 2020. Adv Skin Wound Care 2021;34(6):293–300.
Settlemire I, Beck D, Coulter L. New Ostomy Patient Guide. Ostomy Associations of America Inc; 2020. https://www.ostomy.org/new-ostomy-patient-guide/. Last accessed March 4, 2024.
Maydick D. A descriptive study assessing quality of life for adults with a permanent ostomy and the influence of preoperative stoma site marking. Ostomy Wound Manage 2016;62(5):14–24.
Khan MA, Bhat MA, Magray JA, et al. Stoma site selection: why and how. Ann Surg Educ 2019;1(1):1004.
Person B, Ifargan R, Lachter J, Duek SD, Kluger Y, Assalia A. The impact of preoperative stoma site marking on the incidence of complications, quality of life, and patient’s independence. Dis Colon Rectum 2012;55(7):783–7.
Hsu MY, Lin JP, Hsu HH, Lai HL, Wu YL. Preoperative stoma site marking decreases stoma and peristomal complications: a meta-analysis. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2020;47(3):249–56.
McKenna LS, Taggart E, Stoelting J, Kirkbride G, Forbes GB. The impact of preoperative stoma marking on health-related quality of life: a comparison cohort study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2016;43(1):57–61.
Taneja C, Netsch D, Rolstad BS, Inglese G, Eaves D, Oster G. Risk and economic burden of peristomal skin complications following ostomy surgery. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2019;46(2):143.
Tyler JA, Fox JP, Dharmarajan S, et al. Acute health care resource utilization for ileostomy patients is higher than expected. Dis Colon Rectum 2016;57(12):1412–20.
Kozan R, Gültekin F. Controllable risk factor in the development of parastomal hernia preoperative marking. Türk Kolon ve Rektum Hastaliklari Dergisi 2018;28(4):172–6.
Malik TAM, Lee MJ, Harikrishnan AB. The incidence of stoma related morbidity—a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2018;100(7):501–8.
Yilmaz G, Harputlu D, Pala Mİ, et al. A cross sectional evaluation of patients with ostomy in Türkiye. Turk J Colorectal Dis 2021;31:136–42.
Brand MI, Dujovny N. Preoperative considerations and creation of normal ostomies. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2018;21(01):5–16.
Sherman KL, Wexner SD. Considerations in stoma reversal. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2017;30(03):172–7.
Alenezi A, McGrath I, Kimpton A, Livesay K. Quality of life among ostomy patients: a narrative literature review. J Clin Nurs 2021;30(21-22):3111–23.
Karadağ A, Karabulut H, Baykara ZG, et al. A prospective, multicentered study to assess social adjustment in patients with an intestinal stoma in Türkiye. Ostomy Wound Manage 2015;61(10):16–29.
Arolfo S, Borgiotto C, Bosio G, Mistrangelo M, Allaix ME, Morino M. Preoperative stoma site marking: a simple practice to reduce stoma-related complications. Tech Coloproctol 2018;22:683–7.
Darvin VV, Ilkanich AY, Voronin YS. Implementation of fast-track program for stoma reversal procedures. Koloproktologia 2020;19(1):67–72.
Forsmo HM, Pfeffer F, Rasdal A, Sintonen H, Körner H, Erichsen C. Pre-and postoperative stoma education and guidance within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme reduces length of hospital stay in colorectal surgery. Int J Surg 2016;36:121–6.
Hendren S, Hammond K, Glasgow SC, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for ostomy surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2015;58(4):375–87.
Stokes AL, Tice S, Follett S, et al. Institution of a preoperative stoma education group class decreases rate of peristomal complications in new stoma patients. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2017;44(4):363–7.
Jabbal IS, Spaulding AC, Lemini R, Borkar SR, Stanek K, Colibaseanu DT. Temporary vs. permanent stoma: factors associated with the development of complications and costs for rectal cancer patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022;37(4):823–33.
Arslantaş AU, Karahan E, Büyükuysal MÇ. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Pittman ostomy complication severity index. Turk J Colorectal Dis 2020;30:27–36.
Parmar KL, Zammit M, Smith A, Kenyon D, Lees NP; Greater Manchester and Cheshire Colorectal Cancer Network. A prospective audit of early stoma complications in colorectal cancer treatment throughout the Greater Manchester and Cheshire colorectal cancer network. Colorectal Dis 2011;13(8):935–8.
Kwiatt M, Kawata M. Avoidance and management of stomal complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2013;26(02):112–21.
Zelga P, Kluska P, Zelga M, Piasecka-Zelga J, Dziki A. Patient-related factors associated with stoma and peristomal complications following fecal ostomy surgery: a scoping review. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2021;48(5):415–30.