Modified Q-type purse-string suture duodenal stump embedding method for laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Complication
Duodenal stump leakage
Gastric Cancer
Laparoscopic gastrectomy
The Q-type purse-string suture duodenal stump embedding method
Journal
BMC surgery
ISSN: 1471-2482
Titre abrégé: BMC Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968567
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Apr 2024
24 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
02
02
2024
accepted:
19
04
2024
medline:
25
4
2024
pubmed:
25
4
2024
entrez:
24
4
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study introduced the modified Q-type purse-string suture duodenal stump embedding method, a convenient way to strengthen the duodenum, and compared it to the conventional one to assess its efficacy and safety. This retrospective analysis examined 612 patients who received laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric Cancer at a single center. The patients were divided into Not Reinforced Group (n = 205) and Reinforced Group (n = 407) according to the surgical approach to the duodenal stump. The reinforced group was further divided into a modified Q-type purse-string suture embedding method group (QM, n = 232) and a conventional suture duodenal stump embedding method group (CM, n = 175) according to the methods of duodenal stump enhancement. Clinicopathological characteristics, operative variables, and short-term complications were documented and analyzed. The incidence of duodenal stump leakage(DSL) in the Not Reinforced Group was higher compared to the Reinforced Group, although the difference was not statistically significant [2.4% (5/205) vs 0.7% (3/407), p = 0.339]. Additionally, the Not Reinforced Group exhibited a higher rate of Reoperation due to DSL compared to the Reinforced Group [2 (1.0%) vs. 0, p = 0.046], with one patient in the Not Reinforced Group experiencing mortality due to DSL [1 (0.5%) vs 0, p = 0.158]. Subgroup analysis within the Reinforced Group revealed that the modified Q-type purse-string suture embedding group (QM) subgroup demonstrated statistically significant advantages over the conventional suture embedding group (CM) subgroup. QM exhibited shorter purse-string closure times (4.11 ± 1.840 vs. 6.05 ± 1.577, p = 0.001), higher purse-string closure success rates (93.1% vs. 77.7%, p = 0.001), and greater satisfaction with purse-string closure [224 (96.6%) vs 157 (89.7%), p = 0.005]. No occurrences of duodenal stump leakage were observed in the QM subgroup, while the CM subgroup experienced two cases [2 (1.1%)], though the difference was not statistically significant. Both groups did not exhibit statistically significant differences in secondary surgery or mortality related to duodenal stump leakage. Duodenal Stump Leakage (DSL) is a severe but low-incidence complication. There is no statistically significant relationship between the reinforcement of the duodenal stump and the incidence of DSL. However, laparoscopic reinforcement of the duodenal stump can reduce the severity of fistulas and the probability of Reoperation. The laparoscopic Q-type purse-string suture duodenal stump embedding method is a simple and effective technique that can, to some extent, shorten the operation time and enhance satisfaction with purse-string closure. There is a trend towards reducing the incidence of DSL, thereby improving patient prognosis to a certain extent.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38658911
doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02423-1
pii: 10.1186/s12893-024-02423-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
123Subventions
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 81972269
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Sasako M, et al. D2 Lymphadenectomy Alone or with Para-aortic Nodal Dissection for Gastric Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:453–62.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707035
pubmed: 18669424
Maruyama K, Okabayashi K, Kinoshita T. Progress in gastric cancer surgery in Japan and its limits of radicality. World J Surg. 1987;11:418–25.
doi: 10.1007/BF01655804
pubmed: 3630186
Kunisaki C, et al. A nonrandomized controlled trial: long-term outcomes of LATG/LAPG for cStage I gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1401. Gastric Cancer. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-023-01432-y .
doi: 10.1007/s10120-023-01432-y
pubmed: 37875696
Katai H, et al. Survival outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA or IB gastric cancer (JCOG0912): a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5:142–51.
doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30332-2
pubmed: 31757656
Hiki N, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG0703). Gastric Cancer. 2018;21:155–61.
doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0687-0
pubmed: 28093654
van der Veen A, et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer (LOGICA): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:978–89.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01540
pubmed: 34581617
Zheng C, et al. Outcomes of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy Combined With Spleen-Preserving Hilar Lymphadenectomy for Locally Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2139992.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.39992
pubmed: 34928353
pmcid: 8689389
Wang Z, et al. Short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer in North China: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:33–45.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6391-x
pubmed: 30386984
Zizzo M, et al. Management of duodenal stump fistula after gastrectomy for malignant disease: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Surg. 2019;19:55.
doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0520-x
pubmed: 31138190
pmcid: 6540539
Cozzaglio L, et al. Surgical management of duodenal stump fistula after elective gastrectomy for malignancy: an Italian retrospective multicenter study. Gastric Cancer. 2016;19:273–9.
doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0445-0
pubmed: 25491774
Liu X, Kong W, Ying R, Shan Y, Yin G. Reinforcement methods of duodenal stump after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A review. Heliyon. 2023;9:e17272.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17272
pubmed: 37360094
pmcid: 10285238
Ri M, et al. Duodenal stump reinforcement might reduce both incidence and severity of duodenal stump leakage after laparoscopic gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22:1053–9.
doi: 10.1007/s10120-019-00946-8
pubmed: 30852781
Kim M-C. Laparoscopic reinforcement suture of duodenal stump using barbed suture during laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: preliminary results in consecutive 62 patients. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg. 2017;2:28–28.
doi: 10.21037/ales.2017.01.09
Inoue K, et al. Staple-Line Reinforcement of the Duodenal Stump With Intracorporeal Lembert’s Sutures in Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy With Roux-en-Y Reconstruction for Gastric Cancer. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 2016;26:338–42.
doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000291
Kim CH, et al. A Comparison of Outcomes of Three Reconstruction Methods after Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy. J Gastric Cancer. 2015;15:46.
doi: 10.5230/jgc.2015.15.1.46
pubmed: 25861522
pmcid: 4389096
Association Japanese Gastric Cancer. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:113–23.
doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0042-4
Abu-Rustum NR, Yashar CM, Arend R, Barber E, Bradley K, Brooks R, Campos SM, Chino J, Chon HS, Crispens MA, Damast S, Fisher CM, Frederick P, Gaffney DK, Gaillard S, Giuntoli R II, Glaser S, Holmes J, Howitt BE, Kendra K, Lea J, Lee N, Mantia-Smaldone G, Mariani A, Mutch D, Nagel C, Nekhlyudov L, Podoll M, Rodabaugh K, Salani R, Schorge J, Siedel J, Sisodia R, Soliman P, Ueda S, Urban R, Wethington SL, Wyse E, Zanotti K, McMillian N, Espinosa S. Vulvar Cancer, Version 3.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024;22(2):117–35. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.0013 .
Po Chu Patricia Y, et al. Duodenal stump leakage Lessons to learn from a large scale 15 year cohort study. Am J Surg. 2020;220:976–81.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.02.042
pubmed: 32171473
Reid-Lombardo KM, et al. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy in 1,507 patients: a report from the Pancreatic Anastomotic Leak Study Group. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:1451–8 (discussion 1459).
doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0270-4
pubmed: 17710506
Clavien PA, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2
pubmed: 19638912
Elgeidie A, Abou El-Magd E-S, Elghadban H, Abdelgawad M, Hamed H. Protein Energy Malnutrition After One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with a Biliopancreatic Limb ≤200 cm: A Case Series. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020;30:1320–8.
doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0226
pubmed: 32543277
Hamed H, Ali MA, El-Magd EA. Jejunal stenosis as a sequela after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: a case series. Updates Surg. 2024;76(1):193–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01545-0 . Epub 2023 Jun 6.
Paik H-J, et al. Duodenal stump fistula after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: risk factors, prevention, and management. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016;90:157.
doi: 10.4174/astr.2016.90.3.157
pubmed: 26942159
pmcid: 4773460
Gu L, et al. Risk Factors for Duodenal Stump Leakage after Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. J Gastric Cancer. 2020;20:81.
doi: 10.5230/jgc.2020.20.e4
pubmed: 32269847
pmcid: 7105415
Aurello P, et al. Management of duodenal stump fistula after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:7571–6.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i24.7571
pubmed: 26140005
pmcid: 4481454
Ramos MFKP, et al. Duodenal fistula: The most lethal surgical complication in a case series of radical gastrectomy. Int J Surg. 2018;53:366–70.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.082
pubmed: 29653246
Misawa K, et al. Safety and Feasibility of Linear Stapling Device with Bioabsorbable Polyglycolic Acid Sheet for Duodenal Closure in Gastric Cancer Surgery: A Multi-institutional Phase II Study. World J Surg. 2019;43:192–8.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4748-x
pubmed: 30105634
He H, Li H, Ye B, Liu F. Single Purse-String Suture for Reinforcement of Duodenal Stump During Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1020.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01020
pubmed: 31649881
pmcid: 6794805
Du J, Xue H, Zhao L, Zhang Z, Hu J. Handover method: Simple, classic and harmonized intracorporeal closure of stapled duodenal stump during laparoscopic gastrectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2021;124:41–8.
doi: 10.1002/jso.26484
pubmed: 33831264
Ri M, et al. Duodenal stump reinforcement might reduce both incidence and severity of duodenal stump leakage after laparoscopic gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22:1053–9.
doi: 10.1007/s10120-019-00946-8
pubmed: 30852781
Inokuchi M, et al. Long- and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in patients with clinically and pathological locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:735–42.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5730-7
pubmed: 28726137
Kim KH, Kim MC, Jung GJ. Risk factors for duodenal stump leakage after gastrectomy for gastric cancer and management technique of stump leakage. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014;61(133):1446–53.