Interprofessional collaboration to improve care for patients with diabetes.
Journal
The Nurse practitioner
ISSN: 1538-8662
Titre abrégé: Nurse Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603663
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 May 2024
01 May 2024
Historique:
medline:
25
4
2024
pubmed:
25
4
2024
entrez:
25
4
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in decreased access to routine diabetes care in rural areas and adversely affected self-management of diabetes. This article describes a descriptive pretest-posttest study conducted to assess efficacy in managing hemoglobin A1C (A1C) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system for 1 year. A total of 14 participants completed the Diabetes Mellitus Self-Efficacy Scale survey. Of those 14, 11 used CGM for 1 year; of the 11 who maintained CGM use, A1C levels improved in 9. Results indicate that CGM combined with medication management positively impacts self-efficacy in managing A1C levels among patients with T2DM. Interdisciplinary collaboration optimizes patient outcomes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in decreased access to routine diabetes care in rural areas and adversely affected self-management of diabetes.
METHODS
METHODS
This article describes a descriptive pretest-posttest study conducted to assess efficacy in managing hemoglobin A1C (A1C) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system for 1 year.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 14 participants completed the Diabetes Mellitus Self-Efficacy Scale survey. Of those 14, 11 used CGM for 1 year; of the 11 who maintained CGM use, A1C levels improved in 9.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Results indicate that CGM combined with medication management positively impacts self-efficacy in managing A1C levels among patients with T2DM. Interdisciplinary collaboration optimizes patient outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38662495
doi: 10.1097/01.NPR.0000000000000175
pii: 00006205-202405000-00009
doi:
Substances chimiques
Glycated Hemoglobin
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
34-39Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report. www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/index.html. Accessed March 11, 2024.
Barker LE, Kirtland KA, Gregg EW, Geiss LS, Thompson TJ. Geographic distribution of diagnosed diabetes in the U.S.: a diabetes belt. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(4):434–439.
Marshall JF, Thomas L, Lane NM, et al. Health Disparities in Appalachia [Internet]. Appalachian Regional Commission. 2017. www.arc.gov/report/health-disparities-in-appalachia/.
Jiang X, Jiang H, Li M, Lu Y, Liu K, Sun X. The mediating role of self-efficacy in shaping self-management behaviors among adults with type 2 diabetes. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2019;16(2):151–160.
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215.
Sturt J, Hearnshaw H, Wakelin M. Validity and reliability of the DMSES UK: a measure of self-efficacy for type 2 diabetes self-management. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2010;11(4):374–381.
Artino AR Jr. Academic self-efficacy: from educational theory to instructional practice. Perspect Med Educ. 2012;1(2):76–85.
Khunti K, Aroda VR, Aschner P, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diabetes services: planning for a global recovery. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022;10(12):890–900.
Seidu S, Hambling C, Holmes P, et al. The impact of the COVID pandemic on primary care diabetes services in the UK: a cross-sectional national survey of views of health professionals delivering diabetes care. Prim Care Diabetes. 2022;16(2):257–263.
Maiorino MI, Signoriello S, Maio A, et al. Effects of continuous glucose monitoring on metrics of glycemic control in diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(5):1146–1156.
Giberson S, Yoder S, Lee MP. Improving Patient and Health System Outcomes through Advanced Pharmacy Practice. A Report to the U.S. Surgeon General. Office of the Chief Pharmacist. U.S. Public Health Service. 2011.
Henry TM, Smith S, Hicho M. Treat to goal: impact of clinical pharmacist referral service primarily in diabetes management. Hosp Pharm. 2013;48(8):656–661.
Howard-Thompson A, Farland MZ, Byrd DC, et al. Pharmacist-physician collaboration for diabetes care: cardiovascular outcomes. Ann Pharmacother. 2013;47(11):1471–1477.
Bluml BM, Watson LL, Skelton JB, Manolakis PG, Brock KA. Improving outcomes for diverse populations disproportionately affected by diabetes: final results of Project IMPACT: Diabetes. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2014;54(5):477–485.
Bremner JD, Moazzami K, Wittbrodt M, et al. Diet, stress and mental health. Nutrients. 2020;12(8):2428.
Walker EA, Shmukler C, Ullman R, Blanco E, Scollan-Koliopoulus M, Cohen HW. Results of a successful telephonic intervention to improve diabetes control in urban adults: a randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(1):2–7.
Abughosh SM, Wang X, Serna O, et al. A pharmacist telephone intervention to identify adherence barriers and improve adherence among nonadherent patients with comorbid hypertension and diabetes in a Medicare advantage plan. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016;22(1):63–73.
McCarney R, Warner J, Iliffe S, van Haselen R, Griffin M, Fisher P. The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7(1):30.