Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resection for the treatment of stage II and III sigmoid colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Anterior resection
Laparoscopic
Robotic
Sigmoid colon cancer
Journal
Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN: 1863-2491
Titre abrégé: J Robot Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300401
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 May 2024
10 May 2024
Historique:
received:
28
03
2024
accepted:
30
04
2024
medline:
10
5
2024
pubmed:
10
5
2024
entrez:
10
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Robot-assisted laparoscopic anterior resection is a novel technique. However, evidence in the literature regarding the advantages of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RLS) is insufficient. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of RLS versus conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer. We performed a retrospective study at the Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital. Patients diagnosed with sigmoid colon cancer and underwent anterior resection between January 2019 to September 2023 were included in the study. We compared the basic characteristics of the patients and the short-term and long-term outcomes of patients in the two groups. A total of 452 patients were included. Based on propensity score matching, 212 patients (RLS, n = 106; CLS, n = 106) were included. The baseline data in RLS group was comparable to that in CLS group. Compared with CLS group, RLS group exhibited less estimated blood loss (P = 0.015), more harvested lymph nodes (P = 0.005), longer operation time (P < 0.001) and higher total hospitalization costs (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, there were no significant differences in other perioperative or pathologic outcomes between the two groups. For 3-year prognosis, overall survival rates were 92.5% in the RLS group and 90.6% in the CLS group (HR 0.700, 95% CI 0.276-1.774, P = 0.452); disease-free survival rates were 91.5% in the RLS group and 87.7% in the CLS group (HR 0.613, 95% CI 0.262-1.435, P = 0.259). Compared with CLS, RLS for sigmoid colon cancer was found to be associated with a higher number of lymph nodes harvested, similar perioperative outcomes and long-term survival outcomes. High total hospitalization costs of RLS did not translate into better long-term oncology outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38727774
doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01967-x
pii: 10.1007/s11701-024-01967-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
207Subventions
Organisme : the Key Laboratory of Digestive/Metabolic Disease Fundamentals and Clinical Transformation
ID : No. YZ2020159
Organisme : the Provincial Clinical Key Specialty
ID : No. ZDZKB0002
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J Clinicians 71:209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
Benson AB, Venook AP, Bekaii-Saab T et al (2014) Colon cancer, version 3.2014. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 12:1028–1059. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2014.0099
doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0099
pubmed: 24994923
McCombie AM, Frizelle F, Bagshaw PF et al (2018) The ALCCaS trial: a randomized controlled trial comparing quality of life following laparoscopic versus open colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 61:1156–1162. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001165
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001165
pubmed: 30192324
Cuk P, Kjær MD, Mogensen CB et al (2022) Short-term outcomes in robot-assisted compared to laparoscopic colon cancer resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 36:32–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08782-7
doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08782-7
pubmed: 34724576
Polat F, Willems LH, Dogan K, Rosman C (2019) The oncological and surgical safety of robot-assisted surgery in colorectal cancer: outcomes of a longitudinal prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 33:3644–3655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06653-2
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06653-2
pubmed: 30693389
pmcid: 6795614
Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne GH (2002) Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1689–1696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-7261-2
doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-7261-2
pubmed: 12473897
Kuo L-J, Ngu JC-Y, Tong Y-S, Chen C-C (2017) Combined robotic transanal total mesorectal excision (R-taTME) and single-site plus one-port (R-SSPO) technique for ultra-low rectal surgery—initial experience with a new operation approach. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:249–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2686-3
doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2686-3
pubmed: 27744632
Kim J, Baek S-J, Kang D-W et al (2017) Robotic resection is a good prognostic factor in rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic resection: long-term survival analysis using propensity score matching. Dis Colon Rectum 60:266–273. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000770
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000770
pubmed: 28177988
Wang X, Cao G, Mao W et al (2020) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Can Res Ther 16:979. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_533_18
doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_533_18
Genova P, Pantuso G, Cipolla C et al (2021) Laparoscopic versus robotic right colectomy with extra-corporeal or intra-corporeal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 406:1317–1339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01985-x
doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01985-x
pubmed: 32902707
Feng Q, Yuan W, Li T et al (2022) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenter Hepat 7:991–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00248-5
doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00248-5
Zhang Y, Feng H, Wang S et al (2022) Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic- versus laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 105:106855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106855
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106855
pubmed: 36030038
Beltzer C, Knoerzer L, Bachmann R et al (2019) Robotic versus laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticular disease: a single-center experience of 106 cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 29:1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2019.0451
doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0451
Giordano L, Kassir AA, Gamagami RA et al (2020) Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic sigmoid resection. JSLS 24(e2020):00028. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2020.00028
doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00028
Clavien PA, Barkun J, De Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2
pubmed: 19638912
Weiser MR (2018) AJCC 8th Edition: colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 25:1454–1455. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6462-1
doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6462-1
pubmed: 29616422
Leal Ghezzi T, Campos Corleta O (2016) 30 years of robotic surgery. World J Surg 40:2550–2557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3543-9
doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3543-9
pubmed: 27177648
Crolla RMPH, Tersteeg JJC, Van Der Schelling GP et al (2018) Robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of clinical T4b tumours of distal sigmoid and rectum: initial results. Surg Endosc 32:4571–4578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6210-4
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6210-4
pubmed: 29770881
Chang T-C, Lin E-K, Lu Y-J et al (2021) Single-incision robotic colectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: A matched case control study. Asian J Surg 44:749–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.12.017
doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.12.017
pubmed: 33468374
Zheng H, Wang Q, Fu T et al (2023) Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for left-sided colon cancer: a multicentre study with propensity score matching analysis. Tech Coloproctol 27:569–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-023-02788-0
doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02788-0
pubmed: 37014449
Lim DR, Min BS, Kim MS et al (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resection of sigmoid colon cancer: comparative study of long-term oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 27:1379–1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2619-3
doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2619-3
pubmed: 23239297
de Angelis N, Lizzi V, Azoulay D, Brunetti F (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer: analysis of the initial simultaneous learning curve of a surgical fellow. J Laparoendoscopic Adv Surg Tech 26:882–892. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2016.0321
doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0321
On behalf of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group, Lykke J, Rosenberg J et al (2019) Lymph node yield and tumour subsite are associated with survival in stage I-III colon cancer: results from a national cohort study. World J Surg Onc 17:62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1604-x
doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1604-x
Maeda Y, Shinohara T, Futakawa N et al (2018) The oncologic outcomes of inferior mesenteric artery-preserving laparoscopic lymph node dissection for upper-rectal or sigmoid colon cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 28:1352–1358. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2018.0201
doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0201
Kim CW, Cho MS, Baek SJ et al (2015) Oncologic outcomes of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic anterior resection for sigmoid colon cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 22:924–930. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4039-1
doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4039-1
pubmed: 25201498