Opioid Coprescription Through Risk Mitigation Guidance and Opioid Agonist Treatment Receipt.


Journal

JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 May 2024
Historique:
medline: 15 5 2024
pubmed: 15 5 2024
entrez: 15 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the government of British Columbia, Canada, released clinical guidance to support physicians and nurse practitioners in prescribing pharmaceutical alternatives to the toxic drug supply. These alternatives included opioids and other medications under the risk mitigation guidance (RMG), a limited form of prescribed safer supply, designed to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and harms associated with illicit drug use. Many clinicians chose to coprescribe opioid medications under RMG alongside opioid agonist treatment (OAT). To examine whether prescription of hydromorphone tablets or sustained-release oral morphine (opioid RMG) and OAT coprescription compared with OAT alone is associated with subsequent OAT receipt. This population-based, retrospective cohort study was conducted from March 27, 2020, to August 31, 2021, included individuals from 10 linked health administrative databases from British Columbia, Canada. Individuals who were receiving OAT at opioid RMG initiation and individuals who were receiving OAT and eligible but unexposed to opioid RMG were propensity score matched at opioid RMG initiation on sociodemographic and clinical variables. Data were analyzed between January 2023 and February 2024. Opioid RMG receipt (≥4 days, 1-3 days, or 0 days of opioid RMG dispensed) in a given week. The main outcome was OAT receipt, defined as at least 1 dispensed dose of OAT in the subsequent week. A marginal structural modeling approach was used to control for potential time-varying confounding. A total of 4636 individuals (2955 [64%] male; median age, 38 [31-47] years after matching) were receiving OAT at the time of first opioid RMG dispensation (2281 receiving ongoing OAT and 2352 initiating RMG and OAT concurrently). Opioid RMG receipt of 1 to 3 days in a given week increased the probability of OAT receipt by 27% in the subsequent week (adjusted risk ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.25-1.30), whereas receipt of opioid RMG for 4 days or more resulted in a 46% increase in the probability of OAT receipt in the subsequent week (adjusted risk ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.43-1.49) compared with those not receiving opioid RMG. The biological gradient was robust to different exposure classifications, and the association was stronger among those initiating opioid RMG and OAT concurrently. This cohort study, which acknowledged the intermittent use of both medications, demonstrated that individuals who were coprescribed opioid RMG had higher adjusted probability of continued OAT receipt or reengagement compared with those not receiving opioid RMG.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38748421
pii: 2818726
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11389
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e2411389

Auteurs

Jeong Eun Min (JE)

Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Brenda Carolina Guerra-Alejos (BC)

Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Ruyu Yan (R)

Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Heather Palis (H)

BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Brittany Barker (B)

First Nations Health Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
School of Public Health and Social Policy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.

Karen Urbanoski (K)

School of Public Health and Social Policy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

Bernie Pauly (B)

Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Department of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

Amanda Slaunwhite (A)

Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Paxton Bach (P)

British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Corey Ranger (C)

AVI Health and Community Services, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

Ashley Heaslip (A)

Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Island Medical Program, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

Bohdan Nosyk (B)

Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH