Accuracy and efficiency of dynamic navigated root-end resection in endodontic surgery: a pilot in vitro study.
Accuracy
Dynamic navigation
Endodontic surgery
Root-end resection
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 May 2024
19 May 2024
Historique:
received:
25
02
2024
accepted:
29
04
2024
medline:
20
5
2024
pubmed:
20
5
2024
entrez:
19
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The operation accuracy and efficiency of dynamic navigated endodontic surgery were evaluated through in vitro experiments. This study provides a reference for future clinical application of dynamic navigation systems in endodontic surgery. 3D-printed maxillary anterior teeth were used in the preparation of models for endodontic surgery. Endodontic surgery was performed with and without dynamic navigation by an operator who was proficient in dynamic navigation technology but had no experience in endodontic surgery. Optical scanning data were applied to evaluate the length and angle deviations of root-end resection. And the operation time was recorded. T tests were used to analyze the effect of dynamic navigation technology on the accuracy and duration of endodontic surgery. With dynamic navigation, the root-end resection length deviation was 0.46 ± 0.06 mm, the angle deviation was 2.45 ± 0.96°, and the operation time was 187 ± 22.97 s. Without dynamic navigation, the root-end resection length deviation was 1.20 ± 0.92 mm, the angle deviation was 16.20 ± 9.59°, and the operation time was 247 ± 61.47 s. Less deviation was achieved and less operation time was spent with than without dynamic navigation (P < 0.01). The application of a dynamic navigation system in endodontic surgery can improve the accuracy and efficiency significantly for operators without surgical experience and reduce the operation time.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The operation accuracy and efficiency of dynamic navigated endodontic surgery were evaluated through in vitro experiments. This study provides a reference for future clinical application of dynamic navigation systems in endodontic surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
3D-printed maxillary anterior teeth were used in the preparation of models for endodontic surgery. Endodontic surgery was performed with and without dynamic navigation by an operator who was proficient in dynamic navigation technology but had no experience in endodontic surgery. Optical scanning data were applied to evaluate the length and angle deviations of root-end resection. And the operation time was recorded. T tests were used to analyze the effect of dynamic navigation technology on the accuracy and duration of endodontic surgery.
RESULTS
RESULTS
With dynamic navigation, the root-end resection length deviation was 0.46 ± 0.06 mm, the angle deviation was 2.45 ± 0.96°, and the operation time was 187 ± 22.97 s. Without dynamic navigation, the root-end resection length deviation was 1.20 ± 0.92 mm, the angle deviation was 16.20 ± 9.59°, and the operation time was 247 ± 61.47 s. Less deviation was achieved and less operation time was spent with than without dynamic navigation (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The application of a dynamic navigation system in endodontic surgery can improve the accuracy and efficiency significantly for operators without surgical experience and reduce the operation time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38764019
doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04306-6
pii: 10.1186/s12903-024-04306-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
582Subventions
Organisme : Hygiene and Health Development Scientific Research Fostering Plan of Haidian District Beijing
ID : HP2023-12-509003
Organisme : Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology grant
ID : PKUSSNKP-202119
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Liu SQ, Chen X, Wang XX, Liu W, Zhou X, Wang X. Outcomes and prognostic factors of apical periodontitis by root canal treatment and endodontic microsurgery–a retrospective cohort study. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10:5027–45.
doi: 10.21037/apm-20-2507
pubmed: 33894717
Bucchi C, Rosen E, Taschieri S. Non-surgical root canal treatment and retreatment versus apical surgery in treating apical periodontitis: a systematic review. Int Endod J. 2023;56:475–86.
doi: 10.1111/iej.13793
pubmed: 35762859
Floratos S, Kim S. Modern endodontic microsurgery concepts. Dent Clin North Am. 2017;61:81–91.
doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2016.08.007
pubmed: 27912820
Setzer FC, Kohli MR, Shah SB, Karabucak B, Kim S. Outcome of endodontic surgery: a meta-analysis of the literature-part 2: comparison of endodontic microsurgical techniques with and without the use of higher magnification. J Endod. 2012;38:1–10.
pubmed: 22152611
Metska ME, Parsa A, Adriana Aartman IH, Wesselink PR, Ozok AR. Volumetric changes in apical radiolucencies of endodontically treated teeth assessed by cone-beam computed tomography 1 year after orthograde retreatment. J Endod. 2013;39:1504–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.034
pubmed: 24238437
Zhou W, Zheng Q, Tan X, Song D, Zhang L, Huang D. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and iRoot BP plus root repair material as root-end filling materials in endodontic microsurgery: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Endod. 2017;43:1–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.010
pubmed: 27986096
Oliveira ACS, Candeiro GTM, Pacheco Da Costa FFN, Gazzaneo ID, Alves FRF, Marques FV. Distance and bone density between the root apex and the mandibular canal: a cone-beam study of 9202 roots from a Brazilian population. J Endod. 2019;45:538–e5422.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.01.004
pubmed: 30910355
Kim S, Jung H, Kim S, Shin SJ, Kim E. The influence of an isthmus on the outcomes of surgically treated molars: a retrospective study. J Endod. 2016;42:1029–34.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.04.013
pubmed: 27238415
Pinsky H, Champleboux G, Sarment D. Periapical surgery using CAD/CAM guidance: preclinical results. J Endod. 2007;33:148–51.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.005
pubmed: 17258633
Nagy E, Braunitzer G, Gryschka DG, Barrak I, Antal MA. Accuracy of digitally planned, guided apicoectomy with a conventional trephine and a custom-made endodontic trephine: an in vitro comparative study. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;123:388–94.
doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2021.09.014
pubmed: 34601166
Zehnder MS, Connert T, Weiger R, Krastl G, Kühl S. Guided endodontics: accuracy of a novel method for guided access cavity preparation and root canal location. Int Endod J. 2016;49:966–72.
doi: 10.1111/iej.12544
pubmed: 26353942
Strbac GD, Schnappauf A, Giannis K, Moritz A, Ulm C. Guided modern endodontic surgery: a novel approach for guided osteotomy and root resection. J Endod. 2017;43:496–501.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.11.001
pubmed: 28139285
Peng L, Zhao J, Wang ZH, Sun YC, Liang YH. Accuracy of root-end resection using a digital guide in endodontic surgery: an in vitro study. J Dent Sci. 2021;16:45–50.
doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.06.024
pubmed: 33384777
Tang W, Jiang H. Comparison of static and dynamic navigation in root end resection performed by experienced and inexperienced operators: an in vitro study. J Endod. 2023;49:294–300.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.11.016
pubmed: 36528176
Wu D, Zhou L, Yang J, Zhang B, Lin Y, Chen J, Huang WX, Chen YH. Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guide for dental implant placement. Int J Implant Dent. 2020;6:78.
doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00272-0
pubmed: 33230662
pmcid: 7683639
Wang X, Shaheen E, Shujaat S, Meeus J, Legrand P, Lahoud P, do Nascimento Gerhardt M, Politis C, Jacobs R. Influence of experience on dental implant placement: an in vitro comparison of freehand, static guided and dynamic navigation approaches. Int J Implant Dent. 2022;8:42.
doi: 10.1186/s40729-022-00441-3
pubmed: 36210395
pmcid: 9548458
Xu Z, Zhou L, Zheng M, Lin YJ, Huang WX, Chen J, Li Y, Wu D. The effect of implant surgery experience on the learning curve of a dynamic navigation system: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23:1–11.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02792-8
Geng NB, Ren J, Zhang C, Zhou TR, Feng CJ, Chen SL. Immediate implant placement in the posterior mandibular region was assisted by dynamic real-time navigation: a retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24:1–12.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03947-x
Kuo PJ, Lin CY, Hung TF, Chiu HC, Kuo HY. A novel application of dynamic guided navigation system in immediate implant placement. J Dent Sci. 2022;17:354–60.
doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.09.030
pubmed: 35028058
Janabi A, Tordik PA, Griffin IL, Mostoufi B, Price JB, Chand P, Martinho FC. Accuracy and efficiency of 3-dimensional dynamic navigation system for removal of fiber post from root canal–treated teeth. J Endod. 2021;47:1453–60.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.07.002
pubmed: 34265326
Dianat O, Nosrat A, Tordik PA, Aldahmash SA, Romberg E, Price JB, Mostoufi B. Accuracy and efficiency of a dynamic navigation system for locating calcified canals. J Endod. 2020;46:1719–25.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.07.014
pubmed: 32692993
Torres A, Boelen G, Lambrechts P, Pedano MS, Jacobs R. Dynamic navigation: a laboratory study on the accuracy and potential use of guided root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2021;54:1659–67.
doi: 10.1111/iej.13563
pubmed: 33991122
Lu YJ, Chiu LH, Tsai LY, Fang CY. Dynamic navigation optimizes endodontic microsurgery in an anatomically challenging area. J Dent Sci. 2022;17:580–2.
doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.07.002
pubmed: 35028089
Gambarini G, Galli M, Stefanelli LV, Di Nardo D, Morese A, Seracchiani M, De Angelis F, Di Carlo S, Testarelli L. Endodontic microsurgery using dynamic navigation system: a case report. J Endod. 2019;45:1397–e14026.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.07.010
pubmed: 31515047
Fu W, Chen C, Bian Z, Meng L. Endodontic microsurgery of posterior teeth with the assistance of dynamic navigation technology: a report of three cases. J Endod. 2022;48:943–50.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.03.010
pubmed: 35398147
Zubizarreta-Macho Á, De Pedro Muñoz A, Riad Deglow E, Agustín-Panadero R, Mena Álvarez J. Accuracy of computer-aided dynamic navigation compared to computer-aided static procedure for endodontic access cavities: an in vitro study. J Clin Med. 2020;9:129.
doi: 10.3390/jcm9010129
pubmed: 31906598
pmcid: 7019931
Song M, Chung W, Lee SJ, Kim E. Long-term outcome of the cases classified as successes based on short-term follow-up in endodontic microsurgery. J Endod. 2012;38:1192–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.014
pubmed: 22892734
Monaghan L, Jadun S, Darcey J. Endodontic microsurgery. Part one: diagnosis, patient selection and prognoses. Br Dent J. 2019;226:940–8.
doi: 10.1038/s41415-019-0415-3
pubmed: 31253911
Buniag AG, Pratt AM, Ray JJ. Targeted endodontic microsurgery: a retrospective outcomes assessment of 24 cases. J Endod. 2021;47:762–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.01.007
pubmed: 33548331
Kim S, Kratchman S. Modern endodontic surgery concepts and practice: a review. J Endod. 2006;32:601–23.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.12.010
pubmed: 16793466
Niemczyk SP. Essentials of endodontic microsurgery. Dent Clin North Am. 2010;54:375–99.
doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2009.12.002
pubmed: 20433983
Villa-Machado PA, Botero‐Ramírez X, Tobón‐Arroyave SI. Retrospective follow‐up assessment of prognostic variables associated with the outcome of periradicular surgery. Int Endod J. 2013;46:1063–76.
doi: 10.1111/iej.12100
pubmed: 23560363
Gilheany PA, Figdor D, Tyas MJ. Apical dentin permeability and microleakage associated with root end resection and retrograde filling. J Endod. 1994;20:22–6.
doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80022-1
pubmed: 8182382
Antal M, Nagy E, Braunitzer G, Fráter M, Piffkó J. Accuracy and clinical safety of guided root end resection with a trephine: a case series. Head Face Med. 2019;15:30.
doi: 10.1186/s13005-019-0214-8
pubmed: 31861995
pmcid: 6925511
Giacomino CM, Ray JJ, Wealleans JA. Targeted endodontic microsurgery: a novel approach to anatomically challenging scenarios using 3-dimensional–printed guides and trephine burs-a report of 3 cases. J Endod. 2018;44:671–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.12.019
pubmed: 29426644
Collyer J. Stereotactic navigation in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;48:79–83.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.04.037
pubmed: 20061072
Froum S, Yamanaka T, Cho SC, Kelly R, St James S, Elian N. Techniques to remove a failed integrated implant. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2011;32:22–6. 28–30; quiz 31–2.
pubmed: 21910360
Isoda Y, Imamura E, Ueno D, Akaike T, Hamada Y. Use of a trephine bur and curette for minimally invasive harvesting of particulate cancellous bone and marrow from the iliac crest: a case of alveolar ridge reconstruction. Int J Implant Dent. 2016;2:1.
doi: 10.1186/s40729-015-0033-z
pubmed: 27747693
pmcid: 5005700
Cheng FC, Wang CY, Chiang CP. Removal of failed implants by bone removal technique with a trephine bur: a case report. J Dent Sci. 2023;18:1444–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.02.014
pubmed: 37404661
pmcid: 10316474
Hawkins TK, Wealleans JA, Pratt AM, Ray JJ. Targeted endodontic microsurgery and endodontic microsurgery: a surgical simulation comparison. Int Endod J. 2020;53:715–22.
doi: 10.1111/iej.13243
pubmed: 31674678